User talk:Quoladdie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Auto Unblock[edit]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Quoladdie (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
69.218.77.179 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Camelfort". The reason given for Camelfort's block is: "Vandalism-only account".


Decline reason: Same person, now directly blocked. This is also User:Bonkers189. --jpgordon::==( o ) 23:05, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Quoladdie (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What I did wrong was I logged into a blocked user Bonkers189, and then when he was blocked, I requested to be auto-unblocked, and then an admin declined the request and then blocked me for Sockpuppetry indefinetely. Sockpuppetry is when someone blocks you for trying to get the IP address lifted, but it is declined, and one-by-one, each user who requests an unblock will be blocked for Sockpuppetry. I did not vandalise Wikipedia abusevely in anyway. My username is Quoladdie. I joined Wikipedia on July 9, 2010 and undid a few edits sone by someone in the Spy Fox 3: Operation Ozone page. One of the bad things I did was I was involved in an edit war in the Microsoft Windows, Windows 2000, and Windows XP pages for support pronounceiation (sorry if I spelled it wrong). I was involved in an edit war with Denniss and a couple other IP adresses. I admit I was involved in sockpuppetry and edit wars. I will promise not to involve in abusing multiple accounts again and contribute as a registered user. After I am unblocked (if accepted), I will contribute to undo and revise edits to help the Wikipedia do. *Revert vandalism *Revert blanked pages *Revert spam links *Help add stuff onto stub pages *Help create pages I will contribute as a registered user and help the Wiki for as long as I am on Wikipedia. I am sorry if I mispelled any words.

Decline reason:

If you wish to be unblocked, you need to log into your first account, which appears to be the Bonkers189 account. Also, you have some serious explaining to do when you do request your unblock there, because its behavior was hardly exemplary. Jayron32 05:38, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Quoladdie (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please help. Jayron32 says I have to log in as "Bonkers189" to be unblocked, but he was blocked from editing his talk page. Can an admin find a way to have "Bonkers189" have an unblock request so that if he is unblocked, all sockpuppets are unblocked?

Decline reason:

To answer your second question first, there is no possibility of the sockpuppets being unblocked. To answer your first question second, you will need to send an email to the ban appeals subcommittee in order to have the block on Bonkers 189 lifted. As Jayron says, you will need a good explanation of your behavior. TNXMan 00:15, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bonkers189 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Harrybarb (talk) 17:49, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]