User talk:RainbowOfLight: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:21, 11 October 2008

Yes, I do delete messages from this page from time to time - I view this as more of a personal messenger page, and people don't need (or want) to read everything that's ever been said to me. Quoting from Wikipedia:User_page: Removal of comments...Policy does not prohibit users from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred... Comments are never really gone - they're always in my history. I don't like this page to be full... think of it like a desktop. I don't want to have to go searching "through a pile of papers" (scrolling to the bottom of the page) to find an ongoing conversation. RainbowOfLight ^Talk 11:32, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi rainbow of light thank you for your welcome message. I had a few questions. I was looking at the article for "Urdu" language, and in the first paragraph I saw some edits that I thought was vandalism. Was it ok for me to remove that promptly, without discussion? Canton japan (talk) 11:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Canton japan (talk • contribs) 10:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your revertion of the Rasmussen page as it appears to be a defamation of the person, but the name was taken from a local small controvercy, and created with the intent of vandelism. To my credit no proof of the existance of the 'Raz Theorum' exists on the internet, and it was done with the intent of reparing the vandelism, by correcting the matter. If no validation exists, must the information be deleted? WROKKR (talk) 08:28, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah but its another Thomas Rasmussen, Otherwise you have my agreement. WROKKR (talk) 10:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I am a student in a graduate degree in sociology in Boston, MA and I am in the process of writing a paper on how people use and edit Wikipedia, and on the ways in which they participate and interact (or not) with other editors.

Would you be willing to talk with me about that? I am flexible about the time of the interview and media we use (phone, IM, email), just let me know what works for you. I am looking forward to hearing back from you. Please leave me a message on my User page or email me.

Thank you very much! Buburuza (talk) 01:20, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi. Thanks for your welcome message. BTW, in case you weren't aware of it, I did want to point out that your welcome messages get double signed. 75.4.225.219 (talk) 09:17, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandlism

Impressive. You are always one step ahead of me on reverting vandalism. When I enter a page (that have just been edited) that I think has been vandalised, you've just reverted it. I've got no chance. Keep it up thou! :) Jon swe (talk) 09:22, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, ok. Btw, how many times should I worn someone before reporting them? Jon swe (talk) 09:24, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm not useing huggle thou. Think I'll check it out. Thanks. Jon swe (talk) 09:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Dear RainbowOfLight, thanks for reverting vandalism from my talk page. Have a nice day! AdjustShift (talk) 06:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa

Man, I am sorry I didn't hop on that guy sooner. He got two weeks as his first block. If he tries again after that and I see him, he won't get less than a month. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 06:12, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've got to hand it to you, you were very fast. I'd try to revert one of his edits and you're already two steps ahead. I've seen worse vandals, but that one was one of the most persistent ones I've seen recently. Keep up the vandal hunt!--Mjr162006 (talk) 06:16, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

lol

They're really attacking your page aren't they? You don't seem to be an admin. Why not apply? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shicoco (talk • contribs) 06:13, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You should. You're on top of everything....The only thing that you can't do is just go ahead and block all of these people. Apply, I'll vouch for you, and I'm sure everyone else who have seen your massive vandalism reversing will too. They'd probably give you adminship so you have the power to block because you desperately need it lol.Shicoco (talk) 06:21, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 06:16, 11 October 2008 edit Mjr162006 (talk \| contribs) 394 edits →‎Whoa ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:21, 11 October 2008 edit undo Shicoco (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 619 edits →‎lol Next edit →
Line 44:		Line 44:

	They're really attacking your page aren't they? You don't seem to be an admin. Why not apply? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Shicoco\|Shicoco]] ([[User talk:Shicoco\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Shicoco\|contribs]]) 06:13, 11 October 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		They're really attacking your page aren't they? You don't seem to be an admin. Why not apply? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Shicoco\|Shicoco]] ([[User talk:Shicoco\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Shicoco\|contribs]]) 06:13, 11 October 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

			You should. You're on top of everything....The only thing that you can't do is just go ahead and block all of these people. Apply, I'll vouch for you, and I'm sure everyone else who have seen your massive vandalism reversing will too. They'd probably give you adminship so you have the power to block because you desperately need it lol.[[User:Shicoco\|Shicoco]] ([[User talk:Shicoco\|talk]]) 06:21, 11 October 2008 (UTC)