User talk:Volunteer Marek: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Please AGF: new section
→‎Report at AE: new section
Line 24: Line 24:


Mark, your comments directed at {{U|PackMecEng}} and myself come across as antagonistic rather than civil. Perhaps I'm misreading things but can we try to stick to discussions rather than short one liners? I've tried to push a compromise text later in the discussion. [[User:Springee|Springee]] ([[User talk:Springee|talk]]) 02:42, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Mark, your comments directed at {{U|PackMecEng}} and myself come across as antagonistic rather than civil. Perhaps I'm misreading things but can we try to stick to discussions rather than short one liners? I've tried to push a compromise text later in the discussion. [[User:Springee|Springee]] ([[User talk:Springee|talk]]) 02:42, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

== Report at AE ==

[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FEnforcement&type=revision&diff=851160777&oldid=851135456]--[[User:יניב הורון|יניב הורון (Yaniv)]] ([[User talk:יניב הורון|talk]]) 13:39, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:39, 20 July 2018

The Barnstar of Good Humor
"happy that we finally got a 'self-described neutral observer'" - that made me laugh. That was a positive add. Rockypedia (talk) 00:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Etymology of Szczecin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Etymology of Szczecin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Etymology of Szczecin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ymblanter (talk) 13:55, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, the nomination edit-conflicted with someone else's revert of the resirect, and I wanted to speedy my nomination, but after the first user commented this is not anymore possible.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:39, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greater Poland

Nie znam nikogo z obsesją na punkcie Białych Serbów ani nie jestem zbanowany, co Ty wygadujesz?
Co do sekcji, którą usunąłeś to faktycznie nie była oparta o zbyt dobre źródła więc niech tak zostanie.
Domen von Wielkopolska (talk) 17:21, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please AGF

Mark, your comments directed at PackMecEng and myself come across as antagonistic rather than civil. Perhaps I'm misreading things but can we try to stick to discussions rather than short one liners? I've tried to push a compromise text later in the discussion. Springee (talk) 02:42, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Report at AE

[1]--יניב הורון (Yaniv) (talk) 13:39, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]