User talk:173.15.73.108: Difference between revisions
→February 2019: removed outdated |
→February 2019: removed outdated |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Jusdafax|Jusdafax]]. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of [[Special:Contributions/173.15.73.108|your recent contributions]] —the one you made with <span class="plainlinks">[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Constitution%20Party%20%28United%20States%29&diff=757829291 this edit]</span> to [[:Constitution Party (United States)]]— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Jusdafax|my talk page]]. Thanks. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->[[User:Jusdafax|<font color="green">Jus</font>]][[User talk:Jusdafax|<font color="C1118C">da</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Jusdafax|<font color="#0000FF">fax</font>]] 00:07, 2 January 2017 (UTC) |
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Jusdafax|Jusdafax]]. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of [[Special:Contributions/173.15.73.108|your recent contributions]] —the one you made with <span class="plainlinks">[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Constitution%20Party%20%28United%20States%29&diff=757829291 this edit]</span> to [[:Constitution Party (United States)]]— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Jusdafax|my talk page]]. Thanks. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->[[User:Jusdafax|<font color="green">Jus</font>]][[User talk:Jusdafax|<font color="C1118C">da</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Jusdafax|<font color="#0000FF">fax</font>]] 00:07, 2 January 2017 (UTC) |
||
:''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself or [[Special:UserLogin|logging in with an existing account]] so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> |
:''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself or [[Special:UserLogin|logging in with an existing account]] so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> |
||
== February 2019 == |
|||
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own [[Wikipedia:No original research|personal analysis]] to Wikipedia articles, as you did to [[Joji (musician)]]. Doing so violates Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''Please give a good reason next time you remove content from an infobox.''<!-- Template:uw-npov2 --> [[User:CoolSkittle|<span style="background-color: blue; color: orange">CoolSkittle</span>]] ([[User talk:CoolSkittle|talk]]) 14:10, 28 February 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself or [[Special:UserLogin|logging in with an existing account]] so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> |
|||
Whether you give money to the Foundation or not is up to you, but it does not affect Wikipedia content one way or another. If Wikipedia were swayed by people with political agendas giving or refusing to give money, nothing would appear here. Everyone is offended by something on Wikipedia. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 14:28, 28 February 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Hey, dumbass, this isn't about offense, its about blatant Political Bias, and your blase attitude is exemplar. Don't read what I wrote, write it off because of whom?[[Special:Contributions/173.15.73.108|173.15.73.108]] ([[User talk:173.15.73.108#top|talk]]) |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">Anonymous users from this IP address have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for persistently making [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive edits]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 14:47, 28 February 2019 (UTC)</div></div> |
|||
: ''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]] and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by [[Special:Userlogin|logging in]]''.<!-- Template:uw-disruptblock --> |
|||
{{unblock reviewed | 1=There are no other places identified to discuss clear bias, the posts made were all in good faith, none of them were "disruptive" unless your goal is to sink any viability of unbiased position as a group. To me, you're proving the point that this is now a useless entity of propaganda, and should be treated as such in all discussions | decline = You seem to be going out of your way to indicate the block is appropriate. Fair enough, I'll leave the block in place. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 15:07, 28 February 2019 (UTC)}} |
|||
==Open Bias == |
==Open Bias == |
||
Revision as of 02:19, 4 March 2019
January 2017
Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Constitution Party (United States)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jusdafax 00:07, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Open Bias
Editorial on Wikipedia Editorial Positions, Case of Joji vs Mark Dice
Let me preface by stating I was a regular donor, and editor, from various addresses more recently, for about a decade and a half. That is ending without some serious change. Per the multiple stories about Joji_(musician) being involved in suggesting suicide to children, I think we've found a glaring example of hypocrisy by the Wikipedia "Community" or at least utter derangement by some of the editors. You can find a news story verifying this man's involvement. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/youtube-kids-inappropriate-horrified-mom-discovers-suicide-instructions-in-video-on-youtube-and-youtube-kids/ What brings me to my conclusion that I can no longer support this "project" or anything this "project" produces, is not this man's apparent insanity. It's the obvious discontinuity between the treatment of his page, and the absolute Censorship of a political commentator who does half-assed "man on the street" interviews with idiots, but who holds political views in opposition to some people in San Francisco and the rest of a bunch of socialists. Your editors, knowing they have these pages, knowing they could work in equity, have removed Mr. Dice's history, restricted his current events, and the Youtube numbers which exceed most of the "mainstream stars," and have decided that a man who subverted YoutubeKids to suggest that children kill themselves should continue being promoted in this way. It's clear bias. Your editors have lost their handles, or they're exposing the intents you had from the outset. And you're utterly horrible as an entity, to me, as long as this bias continues. Solve it, remove all of these numbers, or let anyone have it. And stop censoring people's profiles from regular updates based on the biases of the editors. And no, I don't know where else to put this, apparently the idea that circles of editors are being openly biased is not worthy of anyone knowing about it. 173.15.73.108 (talk)