User talk:173.15.73.108

Open Bias

Editorial on Wikipedia Editorial Positions, Case of Joji vs Mark Dice

Let me preface by stating I was a regular donor, and editor, from various addresses more recently, for about a decade and a half. That is ending without some serious change. Per the multiple stories about Joji_(musician) being involved in suggesting suicide to children, I think we've found a glaring example of hypocrisy by the Wikipedia "Community" or at least utter derangement by some of the editors. You can find a news story verifying this man's involvement. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/youtube-kids-inappropriate-horrified-mom-discovers-suicide-instructions-in-video-on-youtube-and-youtube-kids/ What brings me to my conclusion that I can no longer support this "project" or anything this "project" produces, is not this man's apparent insanity. It's the obvious discontinuity between the treatment of his page, and the absolute Censorship of a political commentator who does half-assed "man on the street" interviews with idiots, but who holds political views in opposition to some people in San Francisco and the rest of a bunch of socialists. Your editors, knowing they have these pages, knowing they could work in equity, have removed Mr. Dice's history, restricted his current events, and the Youtube numbers which exceed most of the "mainstream stars," and have decided that a man who subverted YoutubeKids to suggest that children kill themselves should continue being promoted in this way. It's clear bias. Your editors have lost their handles, or they're exposing the intents you had from the outset. And you're utterly horrible as an entity, to me, as long as this bias continues. Solve it, remove all of these numbers, or let anyone have it. And stop censoring people's profiles from regular updates based on the biases of the editors. And no, I don't know where else to put this, apparently the idea that circles of editors are being openly biased is not worthy of anyone knowing about it. 173.15.73.108 (talk)

Whether you give money to the Wikimedia Foundation or not is up to you,(I've never given a penny) but if Wikipedia content depended on who did or did not donate money, or who bowed to pressure when a "YouTuber" called on his viewers to come here and pressure Wikipedia, it would be just as biased as you claim you are bothered by. If you don't wish to work to correct the issues you state their are with the article, or if your political views prevent you from collaborating with others who may hold different views than you do, you may wish to find a project that is more compatible with your views. 331dot (talk) 09:57, 4 March 2019 (UTC

)

Listen up, open your Ears you consistently insulting troll.

The difference is that even at this moment a man who is telling children to kill themselves, SUBVERSIVELY USING YOUTUBE VIDEOS AIMED AT CHILDREN, is still given numbers based on 3 different accounts combined. Wikipedia has determined that this "service" instead of being universal to all people, should be reserved for a certain set of "celebrity" and in this event, one who tells kids to kill themselves in the middle of videos where only the kids would see it. That you CONTINUE TO CLAIM THIS IS POLITICAL ALONE PROVES THE POINT I'M MAKING. YOU'RE FACTUALLY GIVING MORE ATTENTION TO A GUY WHO TOLD CHILDREN TO SELF HARM. And you're saying this is only because of Dice? I've been here for nearly 15 years as my memory serves, THIS *#&%$#$ BULL#%#$ IS ENDEMIC TO THE CURRENT CULTURE, YOU ARE THE PROBLEM I HAVE. YOU REFUSE TO RESPOND IN GOOD FAITH. SO say it again, tell me how little you need me, cause you're damn right, you need something else. Wikipedia, on the other hand, doesn't need you. But with you, and with this, it's a dead entity. 173.15.73.108 (talk) 19:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

---