User talk:2.220.204.70: Difference between revisions
→July 2011: warning |
|||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
== Warning == |
== Warning == |
||
Regardless of whether "explained" or "said" is better in this case (personally I think "said" is more appropriate), '''do not''' call other editors "stupid prick"s or otherwise hurl abuse at them. Any more of that and you'll be blocked from editing. Discuss your editing disagreements civilly or find something else to do. [[User:28bytes|28bytes]] ([[User talk:28bytes|talk]]) 09:07, 15 July 2011 (UTC) |
Regardless of whether "explained" or "said" is better in this case (personally I think "said" is more appropriate), '''do not''' call other editors "stupid prick"s or otherwise hurl abuse at them. Any more of that and you'll be blocked from editing. Discuss your editing disagreements civilly or find something else to do. [[User:28bytes|28bytes]] ([[User talk:28bytes|talk]]) 09:07, 15 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
:When I'm "welcomed" here with an accusation first of vandalism, then of original research, I'm not inclined to be nice. If the third message I get is a threat of a block, well, frankly, you can all fuck off. Block away, motherfucker. And then think about what kind of place this is, where someone can change a word for a better word, and get all this shit in return. What a poisonous bunch of cunts. |
|||
Revision as of 09:12, 15 July 2011
 Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your through which multiple users may connect to the Internet via proxy, so you may receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
 Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
Welcome
July 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Van Tuong Nguyen, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Note that this has nothing to do with WP:NPOV, as the original text quoted in the source was "explained", not "said" as you've explained. Changing it to your version would make it an instant violation of WP:SYNTHESIS. Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 06:08, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Fuck off, you stupid prick. I changed the word "explained" to "said". This is not vandalism (your first template) or original research (your second template). You need to learn some basic writing skills, in particular about how to report other people's views neutrally. This does not involve regurgitating sources word for word. Try thinking a little bit. Consider this example:
- The creationist _____ that bananas were clear evidence for the existence of an intelligent creator
Which one of these is the most neutral choice for blank?
- explained
- claimed
- said
And how much does it matter what word is used in any source you might happen to have found in which this statement appears?
- fuck all
Now, think about that, learn a bit about writing, and about humility, and don't dare to leave any insulting and dishonest templates on this or any other talk page.
Warning
Regardless of whether "explained" or "said" is better in this case (personally I think "said" is more appropriate), do not call other editors "stupid prick"s or otherwise hurl abuse at them. Any more of that and you'll be blocked from editing. Discuss your editing disagreements civilly or find something else to do. 28bytes (talk) 09:07, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- When I'm "welcomed" here with an accusation first of vandalism, then of original research, I'm not inclined to be nice. If the third message I get is a threat of a block, well, frankly, you can all fuck off. Block away, motherfucker. And then think about what kind of place this is, where someone can change a word for a better word, and get all this shit in return. What a poisonous bunch of cunts.