User talk:220.236.117.40

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 220.236.117.40 (talk) at 02:59, 20 July 2022 (Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

220.236.117.40 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All the edits I made last night were to clean up and bring up to date some pages of data relating to the 2022 National Rugby League season and in none of then contained previously aforementioned "original research". In addition no ban evasion took place as I waited for the 2 week block to expire, which it did. 220.236.117.40 (talk) 06:18, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your account is still blocked. 331dot (talk) 08:15, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • You may not remove the above message while this IP is blocked. If you remove it again, your talk page access will be revoked. —C.Fred (talk) 16:36, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, if you want me to stop with the home and away game edits then fine. If that's the biggest problem you've got with "vandalism" have it your way. Otherwise, with the good edits by your own admission, don't revert those. Fair?

The issue is, the home and away edits confirmed that you are CodyCruickshank, and indefinitely-blocked users may not edit Wikipedia under any circumstances. —C.Fred (talk) 00:59, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You say that like it's going to stop me from contributing. Wether you like it or not I'm here to stay. I'm through with your misuse of administrative privileges singling me out on false pretenses of vandalism. You're smug, you're condescending, you're a hypocrite and I'm through with just copping it on the chin and not saying anything about it. 220.236.117.40 (talk) 03:12, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You are a sockpuppet of a blocked editor, and any sockpuppetry is grounds for an immediate block. —C.Fred (talk) 12:25, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You can tell yourself that as many times as you like it's not going to make it true. 220.236.117.40 (talk) 12:41, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The evidence speaks for itself. —C.Fred (talk) 12:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Take a look at the List of players who have played 300 NRL games page and try to tell me that the current revision is better than the up do date one I had last posted. You can't. And you claim to care about accuracy? 220.236.117.40 (talk) 09:19, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sometimes the baby gets thrown out with the bathwater. I haven't had time to vet the sources and re-add the material myself. The simple fact is this: you may not edit Wikipedia, nor may you solicit anybody to edit it for you. —C.Fred (talk) 12:12, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And the actual fact remains that you can't and won't get rid of me. So take as many smug pot shots at me as you like. Hypocrite. 220.236.117.40 (talk) 12:20, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to take that as an admission that you are CodyCruickshank and that you acknowledge you have been blocked twice on this IP for block evasion. A third block for evasion would lead to a community ban, where any use of Wikipedia by you will be reverted on sight, even on user and IP talk pages—unless you'd prefer I just proceed to the administrators' noticeboard and request one now. —C.Fred (talk) 12:27, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The most recent 2 week one. That ban expired yet you used it as an excuse to re-ban anyway because you're a control freak. And your reverting of any edits with correct, documented information in them is in itself vandalism by you. Some double standards you help enforce. 220.236.117.40 (talk) 12:44, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You have not been banned—yet. You have been blocked indefinitely, and any and all IP addresses you use are subject to being indefinitely blocked. Edits by indefinitely-blocked editors who are evading their block may be reverted on sight, regardless of if it is correct or incorrect. —C.Fred (talk) 17:58, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You lumped on a 3 month block when you had no right to. The 2 week block expired. 220.236.117.40 (talk) 02:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:220.236.117.40&oldid=1099310943"