User talk:69.158.90.121: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
NPA
Tags: Blanking Reverted
Line 1: Line 1:
== April 2021 ==

[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|attack]] other editors, as you did at [[:Talk:Andy Ngo]]. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please [[Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot|stay cool]] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> [[User:Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d|Dr. Swag Lord]] ([[User talk:Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d|talk]]) 04:18, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

It is not a personal attack, the editors in question has engaged in questionable behaviour multiple times regarding this page, including trying to cite unreliable sources, discounting reliable sources, and whitewashing subject matter. If I have broken any standard here, it's by assuming bad faith, which is pretty clearly justified given the histories of these two editors. [[Special:Contributions/69.158.90.121|69.158.90.121]] ([[User talk:69.158.90.121#top|talk]]) 04:22, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
:Perhaps you are right. What is your main account? I want to discuss this further with you. [[User:Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d|Dr. Swag Lord]] ([[User talk:Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d|talk]]) 04:28, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
I don't have one because I don't edit Wikipedia enough to make one for myself. Last edit I did iirc was to the [[Russian Imperial Movement]] in February. I've been watching Ngo's Wikipedia page because Ngo has been trying to get his followers to edit it, and it's extremely apparent to me that those two in particular have been trying to whitewash the article. The more I look into Springee, the more I see accusations of bias and weird behavior. He's been trying to discredit reliable sources like Bellingcat, and has gone so far as to say the Alex Zilensky of the Portland Mercury is similarly unreliable. This isn't acting in good faith, it's blatantly ideologically motivated editing designed to remove facts about Ngo that damage his credibility as a journalist. [[Special:Contributions/69.158.90.121|69.158.90.121]] ([[User talk:69.158.90.121#top|talk]]) 05:48, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:02, 25 April 2021