User talk:71.146.21.180

An editor has noted that this IP address and IP 71.146.31.102 are most likely in use by the same editor.
Though this in itself does not violate policy, an editor has made the connection to aid in documentation related to edit warnings; see related IP talk pages.
Please refer to contributions for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:13, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Croscoe. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Ryan Vesey (talk) 21:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I don't know what you were trying to achieve in your recent edit to At Carnegie Hall (Miles Davis album), but you messed up the formatting. Please always use teh "Show preview" button before saving changes to a page, and check carefully that the edit does what it is intended to. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:02, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

recently you changed the "see also" section of Template:Frac/doc by replacing valid links to other templates with links to pages which don't exist. Please be more careful to check the effect of any changes you make. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:13, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Template:Wikipedia ads/doc was mistaken, and has been reverted. It is better to keep clear of editing templates such as this one unless you know how the template works. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:22, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Account

I see that in this edit, replying to this, you say that you once had an account. What account was that? JamesBWatson (talk) 09:43, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have stated that you are evading an indefinite block, and have not clarified the situation when asked to do so, this IP address has been blocked from editing. If you wish to be unblocked please request an unblock on your original account. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:47, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm...i said that i TRIED that they told me to open a new account.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.146.21.180 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Blocks should be used to: 1) prevent imminent or continuing damage and disruption to Wikipedia; 2) deter the continuation of present, disruptive behavior, and, 3) encourage a more productive, congenial editing style within community norms. Its not really block evasion, I have been an honest editor snice march/april, fixing/editing articles numerous times such as this one, editing the tables and adding information, I have been strongly commiting to Wikipedia since the block in (what I believe is) February. And what does JamesBWatson mean, "I haven't clarified the situation"? HE NEVER ASKED ME TO. If he did he would have notified me with the "You have new messages" template. But I never saw it. So he never asked me. And I NEVER stated I was evading a block, I said that I was blocked on my old account and I tried to contest/dispute it, and they told me to OPEN A NEW ACCOUNT. Which I absolutely refuse to do, because its too TIME-CONSUMING. I'm shocked how it has gotten this far, as I said, I really didn't "evade" anything, I'm 1) not damaging or disrupting Wikipedia, 2) not ruining Wikipedia by disruptive behavior, 3) encouraging a more productive editing style by editing in this article. And I will NOT request an unblock at my old account, as there are already four unblock requests, ALL DENIED, and I have a fear that I will be blocked from editing my talk page (meaning: I will be blocked from contesting my INDEFINITE block, meaning that I am PERMANENTLY BLOCKED), I also will not put a unblock there because I have abandoned that account (and I forgot my password). If you can do anything to help please do, as I stated above I do not mean ANYONE ANYWHERE in Wikipedia ANY harm whatsoever, if theres nothing you can do just please allow me to wait out the block. Thank you very much for any and all assistance provided with this situation. Also, I would totally appreciate it if you responded here, because I cannot edit your talk pages.

Decline reason:

You were blocked indefinitely as SineBot1. Being blocked indefinitely means that you are not welcome to contribute here. In order to be unblocked, you need to log back into your old account, address the reasons why you were blocked, and consent to a change of username to address the impersonation issues. Whether intentional or not, editing the site while your account is under an indefinite block is block evasion. It's not just your account that is blocked, it's you. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:06, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'd be happy to look into this for you. What was the original account you were blocked under? Kuru (talk) 18:35, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Its called "SineBot1", I was blocked for "sock puppetry". Thank you very much, this is all kind of confusing to me.

I've asked for a clarification about the original block from the blocking admin. -- Atama頭 08:14, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted a message at User talk:SineBot1 indicating a willingness to consider unblocking. I now see that Kuru & Atama have already said much the same here. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:45, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You say that I never asked you for clarification of the situation regarding your previous account. However, if you look immediately below the section heading "Account" you will see that I did. You edited eight times between my posting that message and your being blocked. I don't know how you can have missed seeing the "you have new messages" warning. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:54, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have unblocked your account. See User talk:SineBot1 for details. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:45, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.