User talk:AgadaUrbanit

• Wikipedia Loves Art
• 
  Mixtec-Puebla Style Pipe with Bluebird, A.D. 1100-1400
• 
  Censer Stand Depicting Principal Bird Deity, 250-450 A.D.
• 
  Olmec Bloodletter Handle, 1000-600BC

Archives (Index)

2010/July 2010/August 2010/September 2010/October 2010/November 2010/December 2011/January 2011/February 2011/March 2011/April 2011/May 2011/June 2011/July 2011/August 2011/September 2011/October 2011/November 2011/December 2012/January 2012/February 2012/March 2012/April 2012/May 2012/June 2012/July 2012/August 2012/September 2012/October 2012/November 2012/December 2013/January 2013/February 2013/March 2013/April 2013/June 2013/July 2013/August 2013/October 2013/November 2013/December 2014/January 2014/July 2014/August 2015/November 2016/June 2016/September 2016/November 2017/February 2017/May 2019/August 2021/September

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Aryamahasattva

Misplaced in article space? GILO   A&E⇑ 23:03, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Yup, my mistake. It should be deleted. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 23:05, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Roger. GILO   A&E⇑ 23:10, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Single Assignment

I saw that you reverted my changes on the Single Assignment thing because of lack of references. I agree. :D

We actually had a reference to the global variable part, the linked C presentation uses a global variable to show side effects and race conditions. However, I haven't found a good source to link about the mutable closures. I am writing a blog post on the subject, but I have no idea if it would be enough.

In any case, I think we should make clear that multiple assignments *may* cause side effects. The previous version (before our edits) was very assertive that it caused side effects and it was wrong.

Josevalim (talk) 07:28, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

My understanding is that an evaluation of expression does not have a side effect if it does not change an observable state of the machine. See Concepts in programming languages, by John C. Mitchell. Both global variable and mutable closures usage do appear to change the observable state of the machine by definition, though I'm not an expert on functional languages. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 07:48, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:34, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

again

Stay off my talk page. Giving me an edit warring warning for making 1 revert (ie the exact number you have made) is just asinine. nableezy - 16:41, 5 May 2011 (UTC)