User talk:Alpha 4615

Not vandalism

well im not sure if hes not notable he's actually pretty famous in underground rap.. ive had a chance to meet him once in person.. and ive been to his concert and seen how his fans get but thats a different story... so if i cant put it on the article strap then where can i put it?????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hector323 (talk • contribs) 05:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

umm it wasnt really plagarism cause where i got it from it said to pass it on.. and what i wrote was summarized... the original was too long.. and i wrote the story about the rapper there cause like his name is "StRap" and well i guess it fits where i wrote itHector323 (talk —Preceding undated comment was added on 04:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC).

umm how the hell do i sign my post???... and umm wat was rong with what i wrote??? i got it from another website and i thought it was a good story to tell —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hector323 (talk • contribs) 04:42, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

i wasnt vandalizing what happenned??(talk)

I don't understand why you reverted my edit of the Acid Bath page. I wasn't vandalizing, please explain what I did wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.91.124.227 (talk) 03:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

First off, please sign your posts. Also you removed a large section of text from an article without an article summary. Also looking at the revision, it's quite possible that the text you removed should've been there. Also when your revisions are previously reverted by another editor, it makes it more suspicious and more likely to be reverted. Please use edit summaries to prevent these type of things in the future. Alpha 4615 (talk) 03:30, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

K sorry --71.91.124.227 (talk) 03:54, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Non-Admin Closure

I haven't been around long enough to even read that page yet, let alone know how. I'll let you do it this time :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ddawkins73 (talk • contribs) 21:59, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Non-admin closures are supposed to be identified as such. I hope you intend to clean this one up. Rklear (talk) 22:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

I meant to do that, I forgot. I knew about, I simply forgot. Fixed. Alpha 4615 (talk) 22:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Also, as best practice, you should avoid non admin closures on AfDs you've participated in... the whole conflict of interest bit. Wouldn't have made a difference in this case, just a friendly reminder. Townlake (talk) 00:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

I agree that is per norm, however this was extremely unambiguous, hence I took the action taken also another editor did rightfully call snowball. Alpha 4615 (talk) 00:43, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

A little something for you...

		The Lonely Geek Barnstar
		This barnstar is in honor of your depressing, unloved presence on IRC on Valentine's Day, 2009. Roses and kisses work for some, but you, noble Wikipedian, have important things to discuss on the internet with people you barely know who you'll probably never meet. Here's to you! FlyingToaster 20:29, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

My talk

Thanks for the rollback, mate :)  GARDEN  22:12, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Not a problem, us editors have to look out for eachother :). Normally I lay off of making any kind of edits to talk pages, but there was clear and present abuse. Birds of a feather flock together ;) Alpha 4615 (talk) 22:15, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Indeedy :) Thanks again!  GARDEN  22:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Very Important Person (2nd nomination)

Hi. Just to let you know I've reverted your snow close of this afd. Afd's are discussions, not votes, so letting them run for the full five days is often fruitful and (usually) does no harm. There is rarely a need to close afd discussions early, unless the article is a candidate for speedy deletion or an obvious hoax.

On a more substantive note, your closing comment seems to show some misunderstanding of the relevant inclusion policies. You may want to have a look at Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Despite some inapt comments left by other editors at the afd, the issue there wasn't really notability but rather the idea that Wikipedia is not a dictionary.

Hope this helps. Anyway, thanks for your time, attention, and helping out. 160.39.213.152 (talk) 00:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)