User talk:Amma&Papa

Priyanka Choudhary

Please don't edit unnecessary things in Priyanka Choudhary page, they will restrict from editing or delete the page in the future, so please stop. Shipa.l9 (talk) 20:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adrija Roy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adrija Roy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrija Roy (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 14:03, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Priyanka Choudhary

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Priyanka Choudhary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priyanka Choudhary (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Broc (talk) 11:07, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Normally I'd suggest creating a draft on the subject and submitting it, but based on the log entries at Draft:Priyanka Choudhary and the indicated history of repeated recreations of an article on her, that's not going to work here. If you want to discuss the matter and explain what's changed since the last AfD (2022), I'll be glad to ping some of the admins involved in closing the AfD and deleting the draft and get them to chime in on what you'll need to demonstrate. —C.Fred (talk) 11:17, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question regarding WP:Terms of use compliance

Regarding this edit, and in particular this text:

We (I am using we because we are five editors who create new articles of actors, shows and films, we are not paid for that but we still do it out of passion and our common interest in entertainment industry. This is the only account we have because my other editor friends do not know how to handle a Wikipedia account well).

The terms of use are clear: one person per account. Please confirm that only one person will be using this account going forward (if more than one has been using it in the past). —C.Fred (talk) 12:25, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I'm sorry Sir. We did not essentially know about WP:Terms of use. Although we work together for creating articles, like finding the right information, the right resources, etc. I'm the only editor who uses this account. If you want my personal details, then I am Ritika Roy who is a student of Ph.d in Korean in Delhi University. Only I use this account. Amma&Papa (talk) 12:41, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello Amma&Papa. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Amma&Papa. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Amma&Papa|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 12:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@User4edits No I'm not paid for my edits in Wikipedia. I had stated that there are 5 of us (editors in Wikipedia) who work together to create new articles on Indian television shows and actors. However, none other than me handles this account. The five of us met during a conference in Delhi University and decided to edit in Wikipedia. Later, we realised we have a common interest in Indian television industry so I created this account and in the timespan of 1.5 years learnt how to use it. I assure that even though we work together for creating new articles only I have the password of this account. Plus, all the five of us are University students in Delhi and are not paid in favour of any of our edits.Amma&Papa (talk) 10:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reply. Please maintain NPOV in your edits and actions. Best wishes, Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 11:02, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@User4edits Okay Sir/Ma'am I will maintain WP:NPOV and also ask my other friends to do the same. Thank you so much for your wishes ❤️. Amma&Papa (talk) 11:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Other accounts

Hello Amma&Papa, I noticed that you used the terms "me and my friends" and "we" multiple times, so I'm curious to know who they are. Would you mind sharing their usernames? In one of your most recent edits, you stated, "...myself and my other editor friends, none of us will appeal for recreation of Priyanka Choudhary's article till next April." This implies that they also edit Wikipedia. Since you know each other off-wiki, it's important to disclose their usernames on your userpage to avoid any misunderstanding of sockpuppetry. Thank you, GSS ^💬 18:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]