Page move-protected

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Wikipedia:RFUD)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Administrator instructions

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G4, G5, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.

Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases

Contents

User:FlightTime/Mark-blocked.js[edit]

Just want to work with this again, thanx —- FlightTime Phone (open channel) 16:18, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Betsocial[edit]

I, Nudges, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nudges (talk) 08:01, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I did not undelete Betsocial. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:22, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Puranam Srinivasa Sastry[edit]

I, 2404:F801:8028:1:39DA:CFA8:3470:A530, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2404:F801:8028:1:39DA:CFA8:3470:A530 (talk) 11:32, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. But there was no point as it is blank! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:11, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Puranam Srinivasa Sastry[edit]

He is a well-known Short story writer and senior Journalist in the Telugu states. Some of his works are translated into Kananda, Marathi and Hindi languages as well. He is a certified translator, linguist and a prominent person in the Telugu journalism and literature world. —2404:F801:8028:1:39DA:CFA8:3470:A530 (talk) 11:35, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. please add references to save this prom early deletion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:11, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Manu Singh[edit]

I was new to the wikipedia community was unaware of the time based deletion. Also, I was unaware of how i should get the article published. please restore the draft. —Swastic 18:12, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 20:32, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:James Alexander George Smith[edit]

I, David J. Rosen, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. David J. Rosen (talk) 19:44, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 20:33, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

User:14Sommer/Comparison old European Hydronymy[edit]

I, PrussianOwl, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. PrussianOwl (talk) 20:47, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Can't really see it making a viable article though. Hut 8.5 21:23, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Thangaratham[edit]

I, PrussianOwl, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. PrussianOwl (talk) 20:49, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:25, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

DNPric.es[edit]

It is a widely used service in the industry with plenty of credible sources to confirm it, please see the User_talk:Landain#DNPric.es —Landain (talk) 23:09, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Sri Somesvara Temple[edit]

Please restore the Wikipedia article about the Sri Somesvara Temple, the Temple was featured on TV Asia and so has notability. If you restore it, I will prominently add the beautiful TV Asia link. Here it is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAEZvqCk29g Thank you. —47.201.190.53 (talk) 01:08, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

That video is not usable on Wikipedia, because it is a copyright violation of a television broadcast. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:36, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
OK I will not use it, but you can see that the Temple does indeed have international notability so can you please restore the Temple's Wikipedia article ? It had been deleted for not having notability, but you see now that it does indeed, so please restore. THANK YOU. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.201.190.53 (talk) 04:14, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

The TV Asia producer posted this video himself, so no copyright problem. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBO15Wc_HTc — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.201.190.53 (talk) 04:46, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Please add these links to the article to show the attention it received in the media. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:28, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Shanlon Wu[edit]

I, Cvizents, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cvizents (talk) 03:50, 19 September 2018 (UTC)


I have rewritten the previous draft and would like to submit it for your approval —Cvizents (talk) 03:55, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:29, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Sudip Pandey[edit]

I don't know the resion but I want to restore the article and need discretion "Publish changes" button below —Bablu Baghel 11:47, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudip Pandey, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Tone (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:34, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
  • As I proposed on my talkpage, I suggest the article is rewritten as a draft and then evaluated, if it merits a transfer to article space. --Tone 14:13, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Neoteric evolutionary theory[edit]

Deletion of this topic appears summary and unfounded. Was the decommissioning editor motivated by religious belief? Evolutionary theory is an on-going topic. Additonal data is now available that strenthens the general hyposthesis and especially the Recall Paradigm. The author's intention is to amplify the reasoning with further supporting evidence; e.g. Sonia Harmand's discovery of worked stone dating to 3.6 million years ago, the dating based on reversal of the Earth's Magnetic Field imprinted in stone samples also showing evidence of human manufacture. Thus, consciousness is evident in the mind of the manufacturer. The author's intent is to demobnstrate that bone frangements, skull size or shape is irrelevant to the presence of consciousness and intelligence and that the 'recall paradigm' is a better descriptor of humans than the differnet anatomical features of various emerging or extinct lines of hominid ancestors.DeQuinceyMalden (talk) 12:00, 19 September 2018 (UTC) Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —DeQuinceyMalden (talk) 12:00, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Mo Magic[edit]

I, Defendefied, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Defendefied (talk) 12:25, 19 September 2018 (UTC)


Wish to add required references to article —Defendefied (talk) 12:35, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:35, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Maxime Ferrari[edit]

I, Blaise.baquiche, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Blaise.baquiche (talk) 17:05, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:20, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:XSEDE (Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment)[edit]

I, PrussianOwl, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. PrussianOwl (talk) 19:13, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 20:28, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Yiannis Dimitras[edit]

I intend to work on the article, including adding sources which should fix the BLP concerns. —Lucky102 (talk) 23:39, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done the article did have a link to a reliable source which had gone dead, I've fixed that but it could do with more sources. Hut 8.5 20:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:List of fellows of the Royal Society of New Zealand[edit]

Please undelete and move to User:Stuartyeates/List of fellows of the Royal Society of New Zealand. —Stuartyeates (talk) 03:16, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done Hut 8.5 20:36, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Stratanium[edit]

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Scanpanusa (talk) 04:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Currently this looks like an ad, so it will have to be rewritten. Secondly your account looks to be a company, and therefore you must make it sound like a person (eg Freda from Scanpanusa), and Thirdly, I assume that you are being paid by Scanpan, so you must make a WP:Paid editing disclosure. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:26, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Paul Flood[edit]

Article was deleted by PROD as failing GNG and the soccer-specific notability guideline WP:NFOOTY. Subject does pass NFOOTY, but the article at time of PRODding neither demonstrated nor stated how. I'd like to work on it. Thanks, —Struway2 (talk) 16:14, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Hut 8.5 20:40, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Grigori Babayan[edit]

Restore this article because this football manager is a main coach of FC Astana. [1] Kazakhstan Premier League is a fully pro league. —91.124.117.194 (talk) 17:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Hut 8.5 20:44, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tim Shields[edit]

I, Babelfisher, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Babelfisher (talk) 17:42, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:17, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Monkey Series (books)[edit]

I, Mwenechanga, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mwenechanga (talk) 18:12, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:18, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Hembree (band)[edit]

Artist charted on Mediabase Alt Radio and is cited in multiple high-profile publications (NPR, Rolling Stone). Meets retainer criteria. —Musicman211 (talk) 19:26, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

 Done @Musicman211: I've restored it not based on the merits your claims about the band but because WP:Articles for deletion/Hembree (band) closed as a soft delete due to low participation. Be advised that the article could easily be renominated for deletion. —C.Fred (talk) 00:07, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Edwin Dean Benton II[edit]

I, Edwinb33, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Edwinb33 (talk) 23:45, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Took time to learn how to submit properly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edwinb33 (talkcontribs) 23:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC) ——C.Fred (talk) 00:01, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
@Edwinb33: Please address the lack of independent reliable sources immediately. Wikipedia is not a webhost; you cannot have a draft up about yourself indefinitely. —C.Fred (talk) 00:15, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Bay Area Rainbow Symphony[edit]

I, Fan of composer Rebecca Clarke, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fan of composer Rebecca Clarke (talk) 03:31, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:26, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Hong Kong Olympiad in Informatics[edit]

The article was deleted for not being updated. However it's the most important programming competition in Hong Kong and one of the feeder competitions of International Olympiad in Informatics. We would like to restore the page and then update it. Thank you —- Microtony 05:48, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:27, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

File:digital Marketing Badge.png[edit]

It is owned by the owner" button below —Sajit Kumar (talk) 08:44, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

This file is not yet deleted. So who is the owner? Have they licensed it with a free license? Or is it used under fair use in an article? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:33, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Neoteric Evolutionary Theory[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —DeQuinceyMalden (talk) 12:24, 21 September 2018 (UTC) Neoteric is a word, though rare, to denote a departure from accepted doctrine. Darwin himself, in introducing a 'neoteric' approach to human origins, was also ridiculed. He used hard (fossil) evidence and his conclusions now widely accepted. But in Darwin's own writings (Darwin, Charles, Notebook 'M' (103) Cambridge University Darwin Archive) he 'mused' (though not in his formal presentation to the Royal Scociety) that 'it is solely the comparison with past ideas, which makes consciousness - & which tells one of reality". This is also quoted in 'Femina Sapiens, Patriarchy, Tyranny and the Origins of Sexual Psyche'. (p81) by this author. The 'Neoteric' approach might be seen as an encapsulation of 'new' ideas but is based on a thorough accumulation of fact and serious examination of evidence and unequivocal fact (surely something close to the heart of Wikipedias legions of officinados?) Recent work by Prof. Martinon-Torre (University of London),Prof.Josh Akey (Washington University,Seattle), Prof. Chris Stringer Natural History Museum London, Sonia Harmand (Stony Brook University), Prof. Mark Findlayson (University of Gibraltar) provide a sizeable amount of evidence in individual and exhaustive papers too numerous to list as supporting references, but together justifying obvious inferences with regard to the processe of human evolution. The modest indication that the definition of 'human' is not determined by skull shape or size is obvious and apparently elicited the proposed deletion of the contribution; the floresensian group (only a metre tall, with a tiny skull) yet produced finely crafted and elegant tools. The simple outcome of the body of work on Human Evolution which may (or may not) be called 'Neoteric', demonstrates that human thought processes (which define the human - or is that in contention?) commenced earlier than 3.3 million years ago, as demonstrated by Harmand's work at Olduvai. Thus, given the collective work of all involved in paleoanthropology, we mgiht concur (presumably) that Darwin's (fleeting but apposite) reference to recall as the precursor of all conscious activity is beyond dispute. The Neoteric Evolutionary theory encapsulates the obvious outcomes that result from human niche expansion, accelerated by consciousness and continuous feed-back driven by recall. Together, the advance of humans far beyond the attainments of close relatives and attendant mental and cultural feedback, and collectively named the 'recall paradigm', is worthy of being retained as and informed, informative and well researched contribution.DeQuinceyMalden (talk) 12:24, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

The page is not deleted -- see Neoteric evolutionary theory however if you don't want it to be deleted, state your case in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neoteric evolutionary theory. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:30, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Even if we would have been able to restore the page (AfD'd articles generally don't get restored unless there was no participation in the AfD), your massive wall of text doesn't really help. A more concise responce generally gets better results. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:25, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Codacy[edit]

Codacy is one of the mostly influential startups in the Portuguese ecosystem. We have highly contributed for the current awareness of Lisbon as a hub for tech in Europe. We are highly committed to the open source community serving over 100,000 users. Our position as one the most widely used tools for automated code review leads us to believe we are a relevant reference in the market, highly contributing for the reduction in global tech debt, recent estimates put ‘Bad code’ costing companies $85 billion annually - and Software engineering efficiency having $3 trillion impact on global GDP. Codacy was the winner of the 2014 Websummit Startup competition and since has created over 40 jobs, raised over $7m in funding. —87.103.12.122 (talk) 15:52, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

What are some of the WP:Reliable sources you would use to keep the article from being deleted again? A quick Google search isn't showing me anything terribly useful. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:54, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
From the way you keep saying "we" and "our" I suggest you read WP:COI. I'm not really inclined to restore this at the request of someone with an obvious conflict of interest. Hut 8.5 15:22, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Vicente Aguirre[edit]

I do not know why it was deleted, I want to have a copy at least. —Soaguirre (talk) 16:05, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

It was deleted because its author blanked it or otherwise tagged it for G7. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:20, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done @Soaguirre: it was deleted because you asked for it to be deleted. If you don't want a page to be deleted then don't ask for it. It's back now. Hut 8.5 15:23, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

OmniMark[edit]

This appears to have been deleted via PROD rather than after an AfD discussion. OmniMark is a long-standing programming language that's been used in publishing since the 1990s. It's the subject of several books listed in WorldCat (including manuals, programming guides, and even the proceedings of an annual users group meeting), and has an established Library of Congress subject heading. While it may be somewhat obscure to many today (both due to its age, and its specialized target audience) it's a notable language in the history of computing and electronic publishing, particularly in the processing of SGML and descendant markup languages, including those that underlie web sites like this one. The article as deleted may need better citations and sources, but it should not be summarily deleted (and certainly not without the chance for broader discussion). —JohnMarkOckerbloom (talk) 18:46, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletions are only deleted if nobody objects within 7 days. They can be and are restored here on request (as the request is interpreted as an objection to the PROD after the fact). —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:54, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Yes, please consider this to be a request to undelete. I plan to fill in some details (with citations) about the language's history, and clean out some of the fluff, after it comes back. Thanks! JohnMarkOckerbloom (talk) 19:02, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Hut 8.5 15:26, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:KeepSolid VPN Unlimited[edit]

I, WalkingTheWire, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. WalkingTheWire (talk) 18:50, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Computer Science House[edit]

This page looks like it was deleted for lack of citations. I have made a few edits to this page in the past and would be willing to spend more time to improve the citations. —lonnez (talk) 21:50, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Villa Sound[edit]

I, Adamhfair, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Adamhfair (talk) 03:52, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 15:41, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

greg herman[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —99.60.176.51 (talk) 07:11, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Dear Wikipedia,

We hope we are writing this to the correct individual and bringing attention to a recently deleted page for our client: Greg Herman. We noticed that his page went missing and we feel was unfairly deleted. It has been posted for many years with few changes. The Greg Herman brand and name is strong is well known in the fashion world with Greg contributing greatly to the field of accessories, etc. The reason for deletion was: (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) by user: Ritchie333.

The article in no way represented unambiguous advertising nor promotion. For this user to delete this is unwarranted. Had the user had an issue, he/she could of edited. However, they took action that was unwarranted and over the top.This page should not have been deleted, and we ask that it be restored. Thanking you in advance for your help in the matter.

Best,

Robyn Davis

G11 deletions are generally not restored here; nine times out of ten they would need far more than a couple of edits to be acceptable. (It's also incredibly common to the point of absurdity for someone who's written or has a stake in a page that's been identified as promotional to claim that it isn't; you have a reason to make that case that doesn't involve Wikipedia's core goals.) In addition, you are obligated to disclose the relationship between you and your client and should have done so well before this point. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 10:36, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
  • X mark.svg Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. You should also read WP:COI. Hut 8.5 15:43, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Canowindra-2804-postmark[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Silent Billy (talk) 11:11, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

I've got no idea why there was problem with the image. I got no idea why some ds deleted it. Nobody sent me a bloody message that there might be a problem. No wonder that the number of editors is in decline. Silent Billy (talk) 11:13, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

  • @Silent Billy: the reason given for the deletion is that you didn't specify a source for the image. Furthermore although the image description claimed the image was being done as fair use, the image was tagged as being available under a free licence and didn't include a full fair use rationale. I'm not sure use of this image in that context meets WP:NFCC either. If you have further questions I suggest you talk to the deleting admin (User:Explicit). Hut 8.5 15:47, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Oronzo Persano[edit]

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Giantronik (talk) 12:13, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The old version is now visible in the page's edit history. Hut 8.5 15:49, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Doctor at home - Portea

Draft:Doctor at home - Portea[edit]

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Tihonata (talk) 22:13, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:12, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Forward and backward Euler method.svg[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Joseph.slater (talk) 01:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

I created this file, I haven't logged in for a long (very long time). As the creator, I simply failed to assign copyright properly.

Unfortunately, I lost my copy in a hard drive failure in December 2017, so I can't upload it again. Joseph.slater (talk) 01:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

@Joseph.slater: You requested restoration back in July and then didn't do anything. Can we be assured that you will fix the problem this time around? ~Anachronist (talk) 23:08, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
@Joseph.slater: so what license do you wish to grant? I suggest dual license with CC-BY-SA-4.0 and GFDL since code is included. If you specify a license the file can come back. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:20, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Kenji Okajima[edit]

I, 133.3.201.51, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 133.3.201.51 (talk) 08:11, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:15, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Untitled X-23 film[edit]

I, Adamstom.97, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. adamstom97 (talk) 20:15, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:15, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Cruise1st[edit]

As far as we are aware as a company, we haven't broken any guidelines with our Wikipedia page. Cruise1st are a legitimate business that deal in the cruise travel industry. We are based in the Lowry Outlet Mall in Manchester. We have a neutral point of view in explaining what Cruise1st are about and we are fully aware that Wikipedia isn't a place to promote products or services to the public. The goal's "just the facts" and we have tried to inform the public of what are services as cruise travel agents are. —148.252.229.178 (talk) 13:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cruise1st, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ReaderofthePack (。◕‿◕。) 14:05, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Paramount Singers[edit]

I, ProfessorTom, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ProfessorTom (talk) 20:58, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

@ProfessorTom:  Done, restored, but there was only one line of text in it. Please see WP:BAND for inclusion criteria that this ensemble needs to meet before they can have an article on Wikipedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:04, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Motorcycle Roadracing Association[edit]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjbbrewer (talkcontribs) 00:06, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:18, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Hyper RPG[edit]

I, Fateor, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fateor (talk) 00:19, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:19, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Stefan Baretzki[edit]

Notable Auschwitz guard, redlinked on several articles —Catrìona (talk) 00:24, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please fix this up! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:23, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Wrong Answer (upcoming film)[edit]

I wasn’t given a proper heads up this draft had exceeded the 6 month maximum between edits. I’d like it restored please cause I don’t wish to reassemble all the information gathered for this draft. —Rusted AutoParts 00:52, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:24, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft talk:ComedyShortsGamer[edit]

This talk page was deleted as G8. But G8 didn't actually apply as Draft:ComedyShortsGamer existed, and the talk page had been recreated. The deleted revisions for the talk page should therefore be restored. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:08, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

 Done, history restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:24, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Wrongworld[edit]

I, Sludj, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sludj (talk) 03:13, 25 September 2018 (UTC)


I now have several additional notable, reliable sources for citation purposes —Sludj (talk) 03:18, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:25, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Tomica_71_1.jpg[edit]

This file was deleted as it was transferred to Commons. It's a copyvio because the photo is a derivative work of the toy, but we can keep it here as fair use. Please ping me once it's undeleted so I can add the fair use rationale. ——Guanaco 05:54, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Sir William Curtius[edit]

I, Somej, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Somej (talk) 10:27, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 20:42, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Cloudistics[edit]

I, Bozhestvo, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bozhestvo (talk) 14:55, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Contains significant copyvio - the "Product" section is taken from [2] for example. If restored the restoring admin should try to evaluate the rest. Hut 8.5 20:45, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

VOX Cinemas[edit]

page can be redirected with history in tact, or should be sent to AFD —Jax 0677 (talk) 16:18, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

But there isn't a value to Wikipedia to restore promotional material. You need to take this up with the deleting admin, JamesBWatson (talk · contribs). ~Anachronist (talk) 16:42, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:The Bad[edit]

I, 213.55.211.19, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 213.55.211.19 (talk) 19:37, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 20:47, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Thomas Ewing French[edit]

I, Tomfromtulsa, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tomfromtulsa (talk) 20:36, 25 September 2018 (UTC)