User talk:Amoruso: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Crzrussian (talk | contribs)
→‎Blocked: unblocked
Crzrussian (talk | contribs)
→‎Blocked: saw description of incivility at the 3rr board
Line 40: Line 40:
I see that you committed your fourth revert at 24 hours and four minutes. How fortuitous!
I see that you committed your fourth revert at 24 hours and four minutes. How fortuitous!
I have asked Dmcdevit what incivility he spoke of. Stay tuned. - <b>[[User:Crzrussian|crz]]</b><small> [[User_talk:Crzrussian|crztalk]]</small> 23:12, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
I have asked Dmcdevit what incivility he spoke of. Stay tuned. - <b>[[User:Crzrussian|crz]]</b><small> [[User_talk:Crzrussian|crztalk]]</small> 23:12, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
::Just to clarify, I read the 3RR noticeboard and saw Dmcdevit's statement as to what incivility is alleged. - <b>[[User:Crzrussian|crz]]</b><small> [[User_talk:Crzrussian|crztalk]]</small> 23:53, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

{| align="center" class="notice noprint" style="background: none; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;"
{| align="center" class="notice noprint" style="background: none; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;"
|-
|-

Revision as of 23:53, 10 December 2006

Archive 1st Archive 2nd Archive

File:Resilient-silver.png The Resilient Barnstar
I, LifeEnemy hereby grant you, Amoruso, this barnstar for listening to the advice others and learning to better keep a discussion civil and on-point.
I, Humus sapiens, award you this Bagel of Zion for improving the coverage of ציון. Remember not to edit on empty stomach.

I'd like to discuss your recent revision of my reverts to 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict. I'll try to go point by point.

  1. You removed the flag of Lebanon. The title of the article is 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict, so it seems fully justified to me to retain it. I did not add it, I simply reverted the removal of it.
  2. You reverted three points in the article where I clarified that the New York Times was reporting on an Israeli research group report that was released. Please refer to the article itself[1], which was already references in the article, which states "In a new report, an Israeli research group says Hezbollah stored weapons in mosques, battled Israelis from inside empty schools, flew white flags while transporting missiles and launched rockets near United Nations monitoring posts. The detailed report on the war was produced by the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center at the Center for Special Studies, a private research group headed by Reuven Erlich, a retired colonel in military intelligence, who worked closely with the Israeli military."
  3. You reverted the inaccurate figures of 20,000 to 30,000 tons of oil, where if you look at the article already cited[2], these numbers are effectively made up. The article lists 12,000 tons, and the other article I added[3] lists 15,000.
  4. I added that 25,000 tons of oil had burned at the facility[4], in the attempt to explain why the numbers may have been skewed (together these are the size of the Exxon Valdez oil spill, which was inaccurate prior to and after your revert).

I'm reverting your revert of my revert. If you'd like to discuss this further, please do as on the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict talk page. Thanks. — George Saliba [talk] 07:13, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule at Masada. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

Dmcdevit·t 11:28, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you committed your fourth revert at 24 hours and four minutes. How fortuitous! I have asked Dmcdevit what incivility he spoke of. Stay tuned. - crz crztalk 23:12, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify, I read the 3RR noticeboard and saw Dmcdevit's statement as to what incivility is alleged. - crz crztalk 23:53, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

No response from Dmcdevit. 24 hours and four minutes is not 24 hours - and 3RR is a precise tool - so time served is enough IMO. Accusation of incivility is "pulled up by the ears", as we say in Russian.

Request handled by: - crz crztalk 23:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]