User talk:Avraham

Archives
Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3	Archive 4
Archive 5	Archive 6	Archive 7	Archive 8
Archive 9	Archive 10	Archive 11	Archive 12
Archive 13	Archive 14	Archive 15

Re: Undercover mosque

Hi,

Thanks for explaining. Just for future reference: Using {{inuse}} tag tells other users not to edit the page. If you use that, then other users are far less likely to catch you mid-revision.Bless sins 15:17, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

User essay

Noticed that your user page is categorised as user essay, which I think is a great idea and never occured to me. — [ aldebaer⁠] 10:00, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

I see. Still, it inspired me to categorise my user page under user essays. — [ aldebaer⁠] 16:41, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Incidentally, User:Avraham/RfA-B is now both in Wikipedia essays and in User essays. User:Radiant adjusted {{essay}} for namespace sensitivity (include in User essays if in user space, WP essays if in WP space). If you don't want your userpage to show up in Cat:User essays, it may be a good idea to noinclude the essay template and omit the cat at the bottom. Or, if you prefer to transclude the template box, to subst it and remove the cat inclusion, which I did here. Hope you don't mind my tampering. — [ aldebaer⁠] 16:58, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

mtj

Avraham: don't you think that it should go by the name it is known by? There is no reason for it to be spelled that way. It's a typo that you are further perpetuating.--Yeshivish 19:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

New page about Israel and the UN

Hello Avraham, you recently edited the page Israel and the United Nations. I invite you to have a look at my rewrite of this subject, Israel, Palestine and the United Nations. I intend to replace the first with the second. Let me know what you think.Emmanuelm 13:21, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Shana tova, g'mar chatima tova, and toda raba

It's a real change for me to be accused of being a Zionist swine. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 01:19, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

yeah, I thought I was being called a Zionist swine, I got all excited :=) Bigglove^talk 01:25, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

There's plenty of venom for everybody. I'm willing to share. :-) — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 01:34, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

How generous ! Bigglove^talk 01:37, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

AJOP

Hi, I'm having yet another problem with YidisherYid over at the AJOP article. AJOP clearly states that the P stands for Programs, yet he keeps adding in Professionals. It is irrelevant what others might call it as the organization states what they are called. Yossiea ^(talk) 19:50, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi Avi, as if i did not address his concern at the talk page. But U R always welcome to block the article for another week like u did the last time when Yosia asked u to block Hasidim and Zionism, Go ahead and use your tools as u see fit, but please do not complain and post warnings that i personally attack u if u involve yourself in these kinds of thinks with your tools to win your points against me. I don't mind being called by you a disruptive user as long as in the end of the day u will talk about the issue.--יודל 20:02, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

I have no idea what is up with YY. I withdrew my AFD nomination, he now is reverting to keep it open because he now has problems with the article. It's very difficult to deal with an EN-1 on Wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yossiea (talk • contribs) 15:22, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Please look at the proper chronicle of events i have asked that AFD to be open long before Yosia has withdrawn it, so he is not the only one who opened that nomination.--יודל 15:25, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Would you like the article deleted? I am really having a hard time understanding you. Yossiea ^(talk) 15:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Yes.--יודל 15:29, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

So you've gone from someone defending the article to someone who now wants it deleted? If so, by all means, open up a new AFD as the nominator, with the proper reasons and let's discuss and vote. Yossiea ^(talk) 15:30, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Exactly, and i already did that. Please do not close it, since i seconded your request long before you closed it so its not anymore your page and u cannot close it.--יודל 15:33, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Of course I can close it. I withdrew my nomination. Get it through.... If you now want it deleted, just simply make your own AFD! Yossiea ^(talk) 15:34, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

That AFD nomination was requested by me just like you. its not yours since i also signed the request form long before you withdraw it. so please do not delete it anymore yourself, leave it up to your friend Avi to use his tools here as he sees fit--יודל 15:37, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

I created the page, it's my nomination. I withdrew my nomination, so I closed the AFD. If you don't like it, open up your own AFD. 1) I'm not even sure why you want the page deleted after being so vocal for it to be a keep. 2) Instead of posting 30 posts about the AFD, why can't you just create your own AFD and get it over with? Yossiea ^(talk) 15:40, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Since i asked it to be nominated for deletion and u closed it afterworlds it does not make it your nomination. It is just as mine as yours--יודל 15:43, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

1) that doesn't make you the nominator, that just means you changed your vote. 2)Instead of posting on and on on people's talk pages, just create your own AFD! Yossiea

1) I not only changed my vote i also nominated it for deletion, so that nomination is More exclusively yours then mine. 2) until that nomination isnt closed why open a new one?--יודל 15:47, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

I nominated it for deletion, you didn't. That is a fact. Learning English might be prudent in this case. You just changed your vote for some reason and jumped on the bandwagon, but the fact remains that I nominated the page and I withdrew the AFD. If you don't like it, then just create a new AFD. I will bli neder not respond to any more of this stupidity. Just create your own AFD and get it over with instead of flooding user's talk pages with on-and-on repeating illogical arguments. Yossiea ^(talk) 15:50, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

first of all stop with the personal attacks about my english where does anything about me personal come into play here? Never did i jump on any bandwagon i have given it utmost thought and i can show you whole e-mail exchanges that i had with many interested parties close to this subject, also i have posted lengthy discussions first on keep not and then on delete. And to the point: yes u were first in nominating for deletion but i requested it just like you, and stop arguing that since u first on this my request is somehow voided, i say that that since my request is before your withdrawal i could not be forced to open a new one, if Avi feels justice is with you i ask him to consider his vote in this page as somebody who makes it too close to make this call here--יודל 16:05, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Isarig's topic ban

Hi Avi, has Isarig's topic ban been lifted?--G-Dett 21:07, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

I've posted at CSN regarding Isarig's violations of his topic ban, in light of which I've suggested he be perma-banned. Judging from his response, the core problem appears to be a simple one of dishonesty.--G-Dett 21:52, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Named Userpage?

The article does not refer to only "named" userpages. I have read the article several times now, and I'm pretty sure I am not insane. Or am I?--168.103.242.198 21:02, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

A suspicious cat from a suspicious user?

Hi. I recently noticed there was a new category around, and, aside from its manifest problems of POV, I happened to note that it fits withing the patterns of a certain user (Pionier, Poor billionaire and other socks). Since you dealt with such cases in the past, I thought this info would interest you. Dahn 11:13, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop personal attacks in the edit summaries

Oy Vei and sigh isn't useful to the subject and is meant to tease and intimidate your partner in collaboration, together with harassing me on my talk page i want to remind you once again please assume good faith. This isn't a warning but a friendly reminder, it will be a nightmare for me and for the whole project if you will end up like Yeshivish, please stay and let me hep u here, thanks--יודל 18:09, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Please do not lie about other users

You write that i have not explained my edit while showing one selective edit summary that was part of another revert, that i have fully explained myself, please before passing judgment on my actions read the history of the last few edit summaries as an admin i expect you should note such basic wiki behavior, at least have the courtesy that you say you want to block me you should do it according to the rules of the game.--יודל 14:24, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the template

Just wanted to say thanks for the holiday template I stole from you. :) Yossiea ^(talk) 16:44, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

User:Yidisheryid

After reviewing his contribs (including his baseless allegations on ANI), I blocked for disruption and incivility. (My block notice is here.) I'm sure someone will come along and yell at me for doing it out of process, but ... ugh. Claiming never to edit other people's comments in the very same edit as you alter others' comments? Claiming that some admin will just read your "vicious" attack and block without reviewing the case? Yeah. Disruption, end of story. -- Merope 18:20, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, I'm sure this isn't the end of it -- it looks like he's picking apart the diffs you supplied and attempting to explain away what he's done. (He omitted the sockpuppetry edit, it seems.) I'll continue to monitor it the best I can. -- Merope 18:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, if I may be blunt, his defenses are complete bollocks. I'm quickly losing patience with him. I may ask another admin to tag in if it escalates. -- Merope 19:06, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

About the right of sockpupetry to vanish

Wikipedia suffered harshly from the case of sockpupetry, now regarding the opinion that since the sockpupets are blocked they have the right to vanish because a return would be detected, [1] Please note that it is a fact that the damage of the sockpupetry action is here today and has not vanished, so was the sockpupetry not so easy to detect in the first place, so the deletion of the record about this case isn't fair[2].--יודל 15:26, 30 September 2007 (UTC)