User talk:Blue5864

Indefinite block for legal threats

Hi. As per our no legal threats policy, you have been blocked from editing, indefinitely. This is how it works: if you wish to continue editing here and to have the block lifted, you need to retract that legal threat. If you wish to take legal action, you are of course free to do so, but are not permitted to have any part of this, including announcing that it is pending, on-site. This does not mean you cannot ask us to remove defamatory and other legally problematic content, we encourage you to do this, but either you take legal action, off site, or you ask us to attend to the problem internally. The point is, for our own legal protection, you cannot have it both ways: if you choose an internal approach, you leave legal threats and action external to this site (i.e. limited to the pertinent court/s). Choice is yours. Note that I have not specifically reviewed this case. El_C 04:51, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

I really have to insist on an answer, a direct one. A concise and intelligible one, please. El_C 15:27, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

My legal threats were against a user not wiki for calling me a "NUTSO" now the other guy username "Christopher R" made legal threats against Wiki for allowing sourced information.--Blue5864 (talk) 15:45, 8 December 2007 (UTC) send me a private email at news@menudo.biz

Actually, this edit specifically states We are filing a lawsuit against wiki and will summons your IP for conspriacy to libel Mr. McGillis. Additionally, this edit is another general threat of lawsuit. IrishGuy ^talk 16:00, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Blue5864, are you prepared to retract any and all legal threats, not just ones against the wiki, but any ones that take place on-our-wiki? El_C 16:05, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes I did not realized I said that and retract that as noted by Irish guy--Blue5864 (talk) 16:09, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Alright, you are unblocked. Hope everything works out well for you. Good luck. El_C 16:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

El_C don't leave yet help me with the Menudo article so that is complies with Wiki policy. The stories are sourced and I am in communication with serveral admin via email who have offered to help if you cant but truly the links and Menudo info while scandal are accurate original PDF newspaper stories that reflect history not fiction. People should know what was printed when this international scandal broke. I did not wright this stuff respected reporters did and major publishers printed it. And do not forget the signed letter by MENUDO PARENTS THAT INLCUDED THE SIGNATURES OF MENUDO BOYS claiming Gay sex in Menudo and drugs. PDF original sourced info. Just guide me on this to make sure we do it right. Wiki nor I created these facts history did. Thanks in advance--Blue5864 (talk) 16:26, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Are you Mcgillismusic? IrishGuy ^talk 16:37, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

NO--Blue5864 (talk) 16:42, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

How exactly does that work considering both you and Mcgillismusic have claimed to be Darrin McGillis? Mcgillismusic added the information about Darrin McGillis to the Menudo article as well as much of the WP:BLP violations you continue to want to readd. Mcgillismusic also created the Darrin McGillis article which was deleted numerous times. IrishGuy ^talk 16:58, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

(ec) I believe you are. This diff and this diff both purport to be by "Darrin McGillis". The Rambling Man (talk)

So, you get back from a block, and your first action is to accuse everybody else of vandalism and unethical conduct, rather than discussing things normally? Dreaded Walrus ^{t c} 16:56, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

You will notice IrishGuy that JIMBO WALES deleted they Mcgillis stuff as a courtesy to him because of unwarranted attacks to his page and blocked the page from recreation because of libel that was placed on the Darrin McGillis page. Anyways I am in private emails with several admin who are just as disturbed as I am at your conduct and as I said have a voice message into Jimbp to resolve this and hopefully get this fiasco behind us.

Walrus just because you are supporter as stated on your site for gays, just remember I am not attacking gays as I am activist for gays rights I am only sourcing stories that are actual PDF stories not fiction involving minors.