User talk:Brewcrewer: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
revert palsbara troll from my talk page. stay away please
Line 35: Line 35:
:::I don't know but you can start by responding to my question. --''[[User:Brewcrewer|<span style="font family:Arial;color:green">brew</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Brewcrewer|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:#2E82F4">crewer</span>]] [[User talk:Brewcrewer|(yada, yada)]]'' 01:23, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
:::I don't know but you can start by responding to my question. --''[[User:Brewcrewer|<span style="font family:Arial;color:green">brew</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Brewcrewer|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:#2E82F4">crewer</span>]] [[User talk:Brewcrewer|(yada, yada)]]'' 01:23, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
::::What's your question?[[User:TeeTylerToe|TeeTylerToe]] ([[User talk:TeeTylerToe|talk]]) 01:31, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
::::What's your question?[[User:TeeTylerToe|TeeTylerToe]] ([[User talk:TeeTylerToe|talk]]) 01:31, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

== [[1948 Palestinian exodus‎]] ==

You may not be aware, but [[WP:BLP]] applies to all areas of the encyclopedia, including Talk pages and edit summaries. Please do not refer to university professors as hacks. Thank you. —&nbsp;[[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|Stalk]]</sub> 18:22, 29 May 2014 (UTC)


== STOP HARRASSING ME! ==
== STOP HARRASSING ME! ==

Revision as of 04:06, 8 June 2014

Nomination of Definitions of pogrom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Definitions of pogrom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Definitions_of_pogrom_(2nd_nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of List of events named pogrom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of events named pogrom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of events named pogrom until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Reverting on operation defensive shield article

The source you cited in your revert says (in hebrew) that Abdullah Daud, one of the people who took refuge in the church was deported from Cyprus to Mauritania. An agreement had been reached between Israel and Europe pressed to find a solution to the siege of the holy Bethlehem. Daud, who was head of palestinian intelligence in Bethlehem had the most trouble finding a country that would accept him. How does that back up the revert you made ignoring the discussion on the talk page referenced by the edit summary?TeeTylerToe (talk) 00:14, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You added information cited to nothing. Why don't you stick to the rules before questioning others about their fidelity to the rules. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 00:38, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You reverted an edit on an article with a 1rr restriction without discussion, ignoring the argument cited in the edit summary, and citing an irrelevant link, and ignoring the article on the subject itself What happens now?TeeTylerToe (talk) 00:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know but you can start by responding to my question. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:23, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What's your question?TeeTylerToe (talk) 01:31, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

STOP HARRASSING ME!

You've been warned by admins multiple times to stop harrassing me, stop calling my edits vandalism. Is there something wrong with you? Sepsis II (talk) 02:36, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deir Yassin