User talk:CapnJackSp

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Battle of Kosovo on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

WP:NPA

Hi, may you please kindly strike or remove the pre-emptive accusation of stonewalling? I was summarizing the questing being asked by the other user; they are the one challenging the material so I also wish that you not accuse me of "vague statements of doubt". My revert of you was purely due to what I saw as a partial application of WP:ONUS which you are free to disagree with. I do wish they would provide more than assertions and I agree that this discussion can be wrapped up quickly. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  18:03, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi!
Wasnt accusing you of stonewalling (what was intended, was that "the only way I see this conversation dragging out long enough for me to be bothered by the removal of material is if someone decides to stonewall this converstation"). However, if you feel it was offensive, I have no trouble removing it as it was an extraneous remark not central to the point I was making.

The remark about misreading policy was, that unless material is very obviously and egregiously against policy (such as obvious BLP violation), longstanding content should not be removed arbitrarily. If it is removed, and the edit is challenged, the status quo prior to those edits should be maintained.

The reason I reverted initially was that I saw it to be obviously relevant and due information, but I dropped the "designated terrorist" label as it was a recent addition (i.e. not "longstanding content") (and was perhaps potentially a BLP violation - though not likely given the citations available). Since I thought those arguments could possibly be made, I kept it out, and reinstated the rest. In future I would hope that if you are reinstating an edit, you go through the changes you are making, since even if you feel you are only undoing a edit citing policy, you are still responsible for the material added/removed in your edit/revert. Cheers, Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 18:30, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Nah. it takes a lot to offend me; just thought it was maybe a little harsh in the context of a dispute in this topic area but I'm satisfied you meant no harm by it. Wanted to get this sent (as that was the gist of why I'm here on your talk page) before I go over the rest of your reply. Thanks :] ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  18:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Splitting discussion for Hardeep Singh Nijjar

An article that been involved with (Hardeep Singh Nijjar ) has content that is proposed to be removed and moved to another article (2023 Canada–India diplomatic crisis). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. 2402:A00:152:85D3:61B4:3AA2:6876:1690 (talk) 16:38, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

split tempate

@CapnJackSp, please add this split tempalte on top of Hardeep Singh Nijjar article, Thanks.

2402:A00:152:85D3:61B4:3AA2:6876:1690 (talk) 16:40, 8 November 2023 (UTC)