User talk:Cckkab: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Caution: Adding unreferenced controversial information about living persons on Ezra Nawi. (TW)
Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Ezra Nawi. (TW)
Line 26: Line 26:
== July 2011 ==
== July 2011 ==
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not add unreferenced or [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|poorly referenced]] information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|living persons]], as you did to [[:Ezra Nawi]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-biog2 --> <span style="font-family: Papyrus">[[User:RolandR|RolandR]] ([[User talk:RolandR|talk]])</span> 12:01, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not add unreferenced or [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|poorly referenced]] information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|living persons]], as you did to [[:Ezra Nawi]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-biog2 --> <span style="font-family: Papyrus">[[User:RolandR|RolandR]] ([[User talk:RolandR|talk]])</span> 12:01, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:Ezra Nawi]]. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus-building in talk pages|collaborate]] with others and avoid editing [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptively]].<br>
In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] states that:
# '''Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.'''
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you continue to edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing without further notice.'''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''You have now added an unsouurced and defamatory claim to this article three times today. This is a breach of Wikipedia policy on biographies of living persons, as well as potentially a breach of the three-revert rule. Please do not repeat this unacceptable edit.'' <span style="font-family: Papyrus">[[User:RolandR|RolandR]] ([[User talk:RolandR|talk]])</span> 12:04, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:04, 30 July 2011

Hello Cckkab, welcome to Wikipedia.

You might find these links helpful: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies.

1981 Irish hunger strike

Please revert your edit. The sources specifically identify it as a Pyrrhic victory, which is capitalised. One Night In Hackney303 21:41, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I changed Cckkab 00:10, 06 Oct 2007 (UTC) The hunger strike was a Pyrrhic victory (a book source given where this claim is made) to Some sources see the hunger strike as a pyrrhic victory (followed by source) The earlier affirmation is categorical, un-Wikipedia like and for me is blatant political motivation

Portobello College

Hi, please put messages at the bottom of talk pages, or they may be missed. The page lacked any verifiable sources. Since what is there was probably true, if it were longer I might have just tagged it unsourced, but a two-sentence "article" could probably be deleted as lacking in content anyway. Jimfbleak (talk) 18:57, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External Links

Hi Cckkab, Please note that chat or discussion forums are normally to be avoided. So I removed the link to boards.ie. Good work on the rest of your edits though!AleXd (talk) 21:02, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello also from me, cckkab. This is on the new link at the TCD article to Satellite Photo of Trinity Hall. It isn't a great picture that's linked, with a big scribble on it. Any chance of a better picture? Strawless (talk) 15:08, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maighread Ní Dhomhnaill

Maighread has since changed the spelling of her name from 'Maighréad' to 'Maighread'. Please discuss moves in talk pages before moving them.--Theosony (talk) 11:58, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Ezra Nawi. Thank you. RolandR (talk) 12:01, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ezra Nawi. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have now added an unsouurced and defamatory claim to this article three times today. This is a breach of Wikipedia policy on biographies of living persons, as well as potentially a breach of the three-revert rule. Please do not repeat this unacceptable edit. RolandR (talk) 12:04, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]