User talk:Checkin34z: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Checkin34z (talk | contribs)
Line 9: Line 9:


[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further warning''' the next time you remove the [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Maintenance|maintenance templates]] from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at [[:Tishma]]. <!-- Template:uw-tdel4 --> [[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 15:41, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further warning''' the next time you remove the [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Maintenance|maintenance templates]] from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at [[:Tishma]]. <!-- Template:uw-tdel4 --> [[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 15:41, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
hey what are u saying? i fixed the problems and removed the blacklisted links!
How is an edit disruptive when it solves a problem? Or do u not want the problem to be fixed? [[User:Checkin34z|Checkin34z]] ([[User talk:Checkin34z#top|talk]]) 17:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:23, 9 May 2016

Respect the work of other contributors

Information icon Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Tishma, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Worldbruce (talk) 07:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


ok, i had assumed that removing sources and also large amounts of sourced information is considered vandalism. anyway, before someone suddenly makes a huge edit and removes large blocks of sources and cited information from an article that others have been editing for years, is would be expected that they would also show respect to other editors and use the talk page to discuss the changes first. thanks! Checkin34z (talk) 07:17, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent disruptive editing

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Tishma. Worldbruce (talk) 15:41, 29 April 2016 (UTC) hey what are u saying? i fixed the problems and removed the blacklisted links! How is an edit disruptive when it solves a problem? Or do u not want the problem to be fixed? Checkin34z (talk) 17:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]