User talk:CrazyAces489: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
CrazyAces489 (talk | contribs)
4,046 edits
No edit summary
CrazyAces489 (talk | contribs)
4,046 edits
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{retired}}
{{retired}}
{{bots|deny}}
{{bots|deny}}
I guess it could always be worse. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 05:02, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

k <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/173.52.89.236|173.52.89.236]] ([[User talk:173.52.89.236|talk]]) 23:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Editing restriction ==

Per [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=670649234#Proposed:_CrazyAces489_banned_from_creating_new_articles this thread] you are banned for a period of one year from creating new articles in main space. If you want to create a new article, you must user Draft space and submit through [[WP:AFC]]. You may appeal this restriction via [[WP:BASC]]. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 08:40, 9 July 2015 (UTC)


=={{ping|JzG|Guy}} ==
The [[WP:BASC]] seems to be only used for historical reference. How would an appeal be done?
[[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 08:44, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Bob Morales (biker)]]==
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read [[WP:Your first article|the guide to writing your first article]].</p><p>You may want to consider using the [[Wikipedia:Article wizard|Article Wizard]] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on [[:Bob Morales (biker)]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#A7|section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Articles|criteria for speedy deletion]], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about [[Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything|what is generally accepted as notable]].

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by [[:Bob Morales (biker)|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. <!-- Template:Db-notability-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <font face="Papyrus" size="4" color="#800080">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</font> <sup><font face="Times New Roman" color="#006400">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</font></sup> 10:26, 9 July 2015 (UTC)


==My RfA==
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" |{{#switch:{{lc:Support}}
|support= [[File:Homemade chocolate chip cookies, fresh out of the oven, November 2009.jpg|120px]]
|neutral= [[File:Chocolate chip cookies cooling on a wire rack, May 2009.jpg|120px]]
|oppose = [[File:Choco_chip_cookie.png|120px]]
|[[File:Choco_chip_cookie.png|120px]]
}}
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" |<center><u><big>'''Pavlov's RfA reward'''</big></u></center>{{Break}}
Thank for !voting at my recent [[WP:RfA|RfA]]. You voted '''Support''' so you get {{#switch:{{lc:Support}}
|support= a whopping three cookies, fresh from the oven!
|neutral= a reasonable two cookies, just cooling off.
|oppose= only one cookie, but a nice one. (Better luck next time.)
| ... to have a cookie anyway.
}}{{Break}}
All&nbsp;the&nbsp;best: ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'',<small> 18:56, 16 July 2015 (UTC).</small><br />
|}

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Paul Vizzio|Paul Vizzio]] (July 21) ==
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[WP:AFC|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included [[WP:CV|copyrighted information]], which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission appears to be taken from http://www.ikfkickboxing.com/PaulVizzio.htm. [[WP:CV|Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere]], unless it explicitly exists under a [[WP:Compatible license|compatible licence]] <u>and</u> is written in an [[WP:NPOV|acceptable tone]]—'''this includes material that you own the copyright to.''' You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using [[WP:CITE|citations]], but [[Wikipedia:C-P|copying and pasting]] or [[WP:PARAPHRASE|closely paraphrasing]] sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.<tt></tt>|}} You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please <u>do not use copyrighted work</u>.

* [[Draft:Paul Vizzio]] may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
* If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:CrazyAces489 '''Articles for creation help desk''']</span> or on the <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FoCuSandLeArN&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:CrazyAces489 '''reviewer's talk page''']</span>.
* You can also get [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

[[User:FoCuSandLeArN|FoCuSandLeArN]] ([[User talk:FoCuSandLeArN|talk]]) 00:45, 21 July 2015 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline-->


{| style="margin: 2em 0;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| [[File:WP teahouse logo 2.png|alt=Teahouse logo]]
| <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; width:420px; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello! '''CrazyAces489''',
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk|Articles for creation help desk]]'''. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''[[Wikipedia:Teahouse|Teahouse]]''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! [[User:FoCuSandLeArN|FoCuSandLeArN]] ([[User talk:FoCuSandLeArN|talk]]) 00:45, 21 July 2015 (UTC)</div>
|}<!-- Template:Teahouse_invitation -->
<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->

== DRN Notice ==

== Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in. ==
[[File:Peacedove.svg|60px|left]]
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard]] regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice--> --[[User:SubSeven|SubSeven]] ([[User talk:SubSeven|talk]]) 01:57, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

== [[WP:DRN|DRN]] case closed ==

[[Image:Wikipedia-Medcab.svg|25px]] Hello, I am [[User:MrScorch6200|MrScorch6200]], a volunteer at the [[WP:DRN|Dispute Resolution Noticeboard]]. You recently filed a request or were a major party in the DRN case titled "[[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Talk:Royce Gracie#Royce Gracie_BJJ_matches|Talk:Royce Gracie#Royce Gracie_BJJ_matches]]". Unfortunately, the case was closed regardless because there was not any participation in the case, nor was there likely to be. When these issues have been addressed, you may refile the DRN request or open a thread on another noticeboard as appropriate. If you have any questions please contact me on [[User_talk:MrScorch6200|my talk page]] or at the [[Wikipedia talk:Dispute resolution noticeboard|DRN talk page]]. Thank you! --<span style="border:2.5px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:MrScorch6200|<font style="color:Navy;background:cyan;">'''Scorch''']] ([[User talk:MrScorch6200|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/MrScorch6200|ctrb]])</font></span> 11:24, 30 July 2015 (UTC) <!--[[Template:DRN-closednote]]-->

*'''Additional comments by volunteer:''' None

==Disambiguation link notification for September 1==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Dwight Frazier]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Joe Hayes]] ([http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Dwight_Frazier check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Dwight_Frazier fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
==[[Val James]]==
Hi, CrazyAces. I was a little concerned to see [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Val_James&diff=685177111&oldid=685150840 this revert] of yours at [[Val James]]. You had added a sentence about James being the victim of racist attacks by NHL fans, TheGracefulSlick had removed it with an explanatory edit summary (= the material was already in the article, rather more fully and specifically, four lines higher up), and then you re-added it without even an explanation — just the automatic edit summary. What happened — didn't you see TGS's edit summary? Don't re-add the sentence again, please, as it really doesn't make sense to have it twice. (And please provide explanatory edit summaries yourself. They seem rather rare in your contributions list.) Happy editing. I'm glad to see you back after the earlier problems! [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] &#124; [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 19:05, 11 October 2015 (UTC).

== IP Comments ==

Hello. The question is not a simple one to answer and the situation can be different depending on context. Firstly it's normally about strength of argument/sense - it'd be foolish to ignore a sensible well made point just because someone is editing as an ip (or indeed any other discriminatory factor). On the other hand in a consensus building exercise new editors are often given less weight than established editors - this applies to both ip and new named accounts. Really a well made point will be in line and gather support from established editors, so it shouldn't make much difference to the outcome.

The real problem with editing anonymously (here or anywhere else) is that you often don't have any continuity, how do you know the person you are talking to is the same as the person you were talking to yesterday, or indeed how can you tell they are different people. A bunch of new accounts or ips turning up in a discussion can easily be achieved by one person or a small group of people, how can you tell.

There are some such as me, who tend to have the same ip for long periods of time, and people tend to know our style etc. so we get a degree of continuity, but i understand that some will give less weight in an overall discussion and it's a choice i make to not register.

Looking around to see what has prompted the question, I would say it's quite normal in the circumstance, new editor(s) turn up for a very narrow topic, say very similar things, and those things are more opinion than based on policy, that's not going to be given too much weight in forming a consensus. --[[Special:Contributions/86.2.216.5|86.2.216.5]] ([[User talk:86.2.216.5|talk]]) 23:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

== All-caps redirects ==

Hi. There is no point creating all-caps redirects like ALEX STIEBLING -> Alex Stiebling, because the search process is case-independent and will find [[Alex Stiebling]] even if you type in all-caps. [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 12:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

== Blocked ==

I blocked you for a week. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/CrazyAces489&oldid=690648372 the SPI page] for the explanation. I hope you will not use any illegitimate alternate accounts and/or IP addresses after the block expires. '''[[User:Vanjagenije|<font color="008B8B">Vanjagenije</font>]] [[User talk:Vanjagenije|<font color="F4A460">(talk)</font>]]''' 18:58, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

I last used my other account NLH. I would have totally stopped using this account if I wasn't outed. Other admins were aware of it and told me to choose an account! How am I blocked for it 5 months later? I don't use other accounts except the one from my IP [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bishonen&diff=prev&oldid=687249141].


{{unblock reviewed | 1=I last used my other account NLH. I would have totally stopped using this account if I wasn't outed. Other admins were aware of it and told me to choose an account! How am I blocked for it 5 months later? I don't use other accounts except the one from my IP. I know what my IP address it and so do you. I don't use other accounts except the one from my IP [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bishonen&diff=prev&oldid=687249141]. Where have I used another IP? don't have time or desire for meatpuppets. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 19:25, 14 November 2015 (UTC) | decline = As noted below, your crossover editing between accounts is a contravention of [[WP:Clean start]]. Your claims of outing and other silliness are similarly unconvincing. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 00:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)}}

Thanks, I guess being stalked and outed on wikipedia is considered to be sillyness. The same way blacks were segregated in the south and the north. I am considered to be a troublemaker because I actually said something about it. I tried to leave to a new account and was chased around by TheGracefulSlick once I was outed by PhRese. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:NegroLeagueHistorian] If you are blind of that happening, I guess most of wikipedia is blind of [[Racial bias on Wikipedia]] . I am not going to expect more from wikipedians, most are blind of their own internal racism. [http:// www.examiner.com/article/racist-undertones-on-wikipedia] [http://www.wired.com/2015/03/wikipedia-sexism/] [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/15/wikipedia-gender-racial-bias_n_7054550.html]. Editors here have said that they take racism seriously here [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:172.56.22.253&oldid=670648449], but to be honest, it is mocked and put down. Just because someone doesn't call you a "n*gger" to your face doesn't mean they aren't racist and trying to hinder your progress". This isn't a [[Post-racial America]], it is a myth as you can read here [https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2014/12/29/the-fallacy-of-a-post-racial-society/]. Especially on wikipedia. I can quit wikipedia and most of my articles I was created will never ever come about since the mainly "mainly technically inclined, English-speaking, white-collar men living in majority-Christian, developed countries in the Northern hemisphere" will never have the interest in creating articles on the subject. [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/15/wikipedia-gender-racial-bias_n_7054550.html] It won't be my loss, it will just keep on showing what interests them. Simply showing their [[Wikipedia:Systemic bias]]. What I write about is mainly about some martial artists and black people such as the [[1972 Olympics Black Power salute]]. [https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/pages/index.php?user=CrazyAces489&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia&namespace=0&redirects=noredirects] Since I was blocked from writing for a year, the loss of that is people who use wikipedia for research. Wiki works against women [http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2013/apr/29/wikipedia-women-problem/] Wikipedia works against blacks. [http://www.colorlines.com/articles/can-black-wikipedia-take-black-twitter] . The suppression can continue, your loss. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 01:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
::*I can't recall ever seeing an unblock request being successful by calling the admin a racist and telling him that blocking you is Wikipedia's loss. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 02:39, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
:*Niteshift, I am stating things as they are. I said wikipedia in itself is full of internal racism. I Malcolm X once said "I am not a Republican nor a Democrat, nor an American, and got sense enough to know it. I am one of the 22 million Black victims of the Democrats, and one of the 22 million Black victims of the Republicans, and one of the 22 million Black victims of Americanism.... You and I have never seen Democracy, all we've seen is hypocracy.... If you go to jail, so what. If you are Black, you were born in jail. If you are Black, you were born in jail, in the North as well as the South. Stop talking about the South. As long as you are South of the Canadian border, you are South." [https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/malcolm-x/] Wikipedia works by consensus, by a democracy, a hypocritical democracy. You call me a victim, Malcolm X said all blacks in America were victims. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 03:26, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
:*That level of willful ignorance is staggering. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 03:39, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
*You created new account ({{U|NegroLeagueHistorian}}) claiming [[WP:Clean start]], but then used both accounts interchangeably, as can be seen on their contributions. That is totally against the [[WP:Clean start]] policy. Although that was 5 months ago, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2015_October_11&diff=prev&oldid=686094355 this] was less than a month ago, and there are more such examples of brand new IPs coming to defend your position, and using accusations of racism like you used before and was already blocked once because of that ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2015_October_11&diff=prev&oldid=686094402][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jose_Landi&diff=prev&oldid=683341651]). That can't be coincidence. '''[[User:Vanjagenije|<font color="008B8B">Vanjagenije</font>]] [[User talk:Vanjagenije|<font color="F4A460">(talk)</font>]]''' 19:32, 14 November 2015 (UTC)



I created NLH and stopped using CA for a month from late April to late May 2015. I went back on CA to create one article on [[James Takemori]] who had recently died. I didn't want to create any article on martial artists on NLH. I made like 4 edits. I was outed by Peter Rehese around May 28, 2015 and TheGracefulSlick started following me around in my new account. After he started really bothering me around June 23, 2015 (a month after using CA once to create the James Takemori article), I decided to finish up loose ends (fight to keep some articles that were put up for deletion) on my NLH and go back to my CA end of June 2015. At no point did I tag team, write on the same articles, or support each other. The accounts were kept separate at all times. The only connection you will see is TheGracefulSlick who followed me on both accounts. Admins were well AWARE of it and no one blocked me of the situation. I begged for an IBAN so that TheGracefulSlick would stop interacting with me. He still follows across various articles to this very day. I stopped using NLH a while ago. I looked at these alleged IP's. The first one you listed 96.127, Geolocates back to Montreal, Canada. [http://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/96.127.236.62], the really weird IP 2607:FB90, Geolocates to Massachusetts, and 173 does to NY [http://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/173.52.89.236]. I only claim one account and sometimes use my IP. All someone has to do if they really don't care for me is simply have someone come around and support me. Even if I don't know who they are. This is what I believe happened here. If you want to see real meatpuppetry take a look at this. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Papaursa/Archive] [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 23:41, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
:I was attacked a lot of times on wikipedia for my "poor grammar" but when I explained it was because I spoke using [[African American Vernacular English]] I was mocked numerous times by editors here (nothing was done). The issue with many editors is [[WP:WORLDVIEW]]. I was accused of being racist when I stated "MDTEMP listed 7 highly referenced articles, 6 of which are of African American Athletes all at once. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Thompson (Judo), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Cofield, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernest R. Smith, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odell Terry, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chester Evans, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robey Reed and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karl Geis (judo). The only one to survive the AFD so far are Karl Geis (judo) (who happens to be white) and James Thompson (Judo) who was a national champion and member of the US National Team." [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/PRehse/Archive] I still find it strange but I guess pointing out makes me a racist. I guess it is horrible to even think that racism could possibly even exist on wikipedia. Fact remains Discrimination on wikipedia is a real thing as I have created an article on it. [[Racial bias on Wikipedia]]. There is even an article on it from a reliable source called "Meet the Editors Fighting Racism and Sexism on Wikipedia," [http://www.wired.com/2015/03/wikipedia-sexism/] making light of the situation isn't nice to one degree. In the end, I barely edit on wikipedia compared to before. You can do a checkuser to see if any new accounts popup. A week ban isn't a big deal to me as I barely edit these days. I had one passion before and that was creating articles. Since I have to do AFC now, it barely makes sense. I was totally fine with this Sockpupppet investigation as I was the previous time because I knew I wasn't using sockpuppets or meatpuppets. I simply want my name cleared. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 23:41, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
:*Please stop saying you were outed. [[WP:OUTING]] you would have drawn a block for the editor who outed you. Connecting your new user name to your old user name isn't outing you, it was merely stating the obvious. Second, your whole Ebonics thing is ridiculous. Nobody cares if you speak Ebonics or not, but you are required to edit using standard English. You were ''told'' this, not "mocked". And no, don't post a bunch of ancient diffs because 1) you'll be wasting time and 2) is has jack crap to do with the matter at hand, which is your sock-puppetry. That's been your MO....you divert attention from the topic, play the victim card (almost always making it about your race) and claim you're being stalked. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 01:25, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

NiteShift, I was outted. Secondly you were one of the people who was mocking my sue of African American Vernacular. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive891#Revenge_nomination] As you are doing now. You told me if I can't speak English your way to go make a blog on wordpress. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive891#Revenge_nomination] . I guess you will never understand how life might be for an urban minority male. Walk one day in my shoes and you might just understand. When your leaders are assassinated [[Malcolm X]], [[Martin Luther King]], your people killed [[Death of Eric Garner]], [[Trayvon Martin]], for years [[Emmett Till]] The struggle exists and continues. I asked you to stay off of my page and you come back. I didn't abusively sockpuppet, I switched back to an old account. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 01:31, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
:*No, you weren't outed. Have you read what [[WP:OUTING]] is? Where has anyone revealed your real name or personal information? Connecting you to a past account (that wasn't past) isn't outing under the policy. Second, I didn't mock you. I corrected you. Then I dismissed your excuse making. I DID tell you that if you can't use standard English that you shouldn't edit. Sorry if you don't like the rules. As I said, if you want to start an Ebonics Wikipedia, you are free to do so and make up your own rules. I note you fail to note that I also offered to help you and made suggestions to help you improve your editing. I don't need to understand being an "urban minority male" to edit Wikipedia intelligently. Nor do I need to walk in your shoes. You sit here and spout what "my people" did while knowing nothing about my life beyond what I tell you. "My people" didn't kill Garner, Martin or Till. Have you walked in my shoes? Of course not, yet you think you can tell me all about me and "my people". Your Wikipedia editing isn't part of "the struggle". Your victim mindset is one of the most consistently predictable facets of your editing. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 02:55, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, Outing is revealing someone's new username. You not only mocked me you made numerous points of harrassment including saying that I was ''butt hurt''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Drmies&diff=prev&oldid=669840157]. You have been blocked far more than I have for personal attacks. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3ANiteshift36] . Others have spoken to you about this. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Drmies&diff=next&oldid=669840157] I specifically told you not to post on my page and you still do. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 14:52, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
:No, it's not outing. Have you ever '''read''' the policy on outing? Yes, I said you were butt hurt, which doesn't ''mock'' your use of Ebonics. Perhaps you should look up what the word mock actually means. You may even claim I've mocked your ''behavior'', but I don't think you can find an example of mocking your use of Ebonics. Yes, I have ONE block for a personal attack. You have ONE. So I don't have "far more" blocks for a PA.? I love how you completely ignore the hypocrisy of telling me that "my people" killed <insert random name>, while telling me that I have to walk in your shoes to talk about your conduct. Thanks for the laughs. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 18:25, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
::It's pretty cute that you say I have a victim mentality. It reminds me of some people who tell blacks to get over slavery but say we shouldn't forget the Holocaust or don't ever forget 9-11. You stated here [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive891#Revenge_nomination] that "You're not quoting sources using AAVE, it's you that is using it. It's not acceptable." So you're saying that the way many black people talk isn't acceptable in America? I highly believe that is mocking! [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 21:11, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
:*If the source uses standard English and you convert it to Ebonics, then it's not the source using it, it's your use of it. I don't care if you use Ebonics anywhere else in the world. When you edit on the English Wikipedia, you can't. That's not mocking (a word you still don't seem to have looked up). Yes, you've played the victim over and over. None of this has to do with your race. It has to do with your refusal to follow policies and guidelines. They apply to all races. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 01:06, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
::Nightshift, I'm not sorry for being an ethnic minority. I'm sorry for you that you judge me based on me speaking how many ethnic minorities do. It's people with your mentality that we had the [[African-American Civil Rights Movement (1954–68)]]. You can dismiss it all you want and call minorities victims. You can mock minorities with your superiority built off the backs of blacks. You can mock the way we speak. One day, we shall overcome! [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 01:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
:*And one day, you'll learn what the words you are using mean. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 03:39, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
:: a tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny. [http://www.litscape.com/author/Aesop/The_Wolf_And_The_Lamb.html] [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 21:27, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
:I do, you won't ever understand. Malcolm X once said "The American Negro never can be blamed for his racial animosities - he is only reacting to four hundred years of the conscious racism of the American whites." [http://islam.uga.edu/malcomx.html] You will never understand the struggle that exists. You sit on your high chair judging me who advocates for my people to rise. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 03:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

={{ping|TheGracefulSlick}} ==
I saw your comment on [[Pee Wee Kirkland]] where you stated "Street basketball player...thousands of those. Please learn about notability so I do not need to keep doing this. Thank you" [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pee_Wee_Kirkland&diff=next&oldid=690559559]. Since you feel he is one of thousands and continue to have adhominim attacks on this. I will school you on him. He has had many independent articles written on him including [[The Daily News]] [http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/basketball/ex-rucker-star-kirkland-dealing-drugs-delivering-hope-article-1.289983], [[ESPN]] [http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/blackhistory2008/columns/story?page=buckheit/080207], TV Spots [http://pix11.com/2015/02/11/the-dwight-connection-pee-wee-kirkland-coach-and-son-come-full-circle/] , [[Sherdog]] which is known for MMA [http://www.sherdog.com/news/articles/Fedor-Emelianenko-and-the-Pee-Wee-Kirkland-Parallels-92679], the [[Village Voice]] [http://www.villagevoice.com/news/how-this-man-became-the-voice-of-rucker-park-7212851], [[Sports Illustrated]] [http://www.si.com/extra-mustard/2015/02/09/nba-history-new-york-city-basketball-map-all-star] and the [[New York Times]] [http://www.nytimes.com/1997/01/12/sports/the-legend-of-pee-wee-kirkland-grows.html]. He easily passes GNG. If you don't think so, why not nominate him for an AFD. I am willing to bet you a hundred dollars that it will be ruled a SNOW KEEP! Just because you don't like me and vice versa doesn't mean you have to keep insulting me in comments. I am now going to finally ask 2 admins {{ping|Vanjagenije}} and {{ping|Bishonen }} to please put up an IBAN on {{ping|TheGracefulSlick}} from contacting me and stalking me on wikipedia. I would have still been on NLH had he not stalked me on that username. This is not the first time I have asked about an IBAN due to my dealings with him. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive891#TheGracefulSlick] [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 01:31, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
:Go ahead and ask those two admin CA, they aren't going to put up with your "I'm the victim, oh woh is me" speech anymore. They are more than wise enough to tell I'm only editing where you edit because people need to keep fixing your mistakes. I don't even think you can call them mistakes anymore because users have told you time and time again how to improve, but you just blantantly refuse. I'm not messaging you during this block of yours anymore, unless you force my hand with more lucrative rants you seem almost famous for making. When the block is up, it will be your last chance. I don't think it will do any good, which is a shame, but that's the path you choose. My offer to review your articles so you can continue writing still stands, but, I doubt you will accept.[[User:TheGracefulSlick|TheGracefulSlick]] ([[User talk:TheGracefulSlick|talk]]) 04:23, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
::I see you haven't even addressed my original point of putting up [[Pee Wee Reese]] for deletion since you put up the notability tag. Maybe you don't have enough faith in your own trash talking to me. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 14:44, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
:::Seriously, that is all you got out of that? Really?? I have offered to review your articles so you can continue writing at nearly the same pace, but that is all you got from what I said? And now, as you are blocked, you are trying to WP:Bait me (which I know you will deny)? Just to show you that I'm trying to work with the little you give the Wiki community, I'm going to fix the [[Pee Wee Kirkland]] article and let YOU decide if it is notable when you have served your block. I will get to writing as soon as I finish writing my next article.[[User:TheGracefulSlick|TheGracefulSlick]] ([[User talk:TheGracefulSlick|talk]]) 18:58, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
::You are the one who put up the notability tag with a mocking message in the comment section. I challenged you to put it up for an AFD since you don't think it's notable. Past that, i'm the victim is based on a systematic bias that is big on wikipedia. Read this article and you might understand. [http://www.wired.com/2015/03/wikipedia-sexism/] Making fun of people trying to be put on an equal setting is not the answer. I honestly have no desire to work with you especially after the kinds of commments you write when reverting my changes, "Street basketball player...thousands of those. Please learn about notability so I do not need to keep doing this. Thank you" [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pee_Wee_Kirkland&diff=next&oldid=690559559], making light of the struggle of African Americans, and being rude to me in general. What was the last article I went on of yours? (hint I don't), what what the last article you edited that I went on (I don't go on articles that you go on), When did I last edit on your talk page? (I haven't in months). I don't want anything to do with you? I understand you are made about the fact that I reported you and you were blocked for canvassing but chasing me around for several months has really gotten ridiculous. You aren't going to make me blow up and curse you out. I simply want an IBAN of your interactions with me. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 21:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
:::You know what, I'm done, I'm not playing your game. I'm going to fix up the article, not because I'm trying to work with you, but because it is poorly-written and needs help. I'm still going to fix the problems you cause on this account or any sock puppet you make, because it is the right thing to do on my part. There are African-Americans who have to face real adversity and racial prejudice, but fight against it to become better, wiser people. Heck, there are Syrians who worry about being massacred, Islamics being killed for a variation from their religion, and African-Americans suffering in class-structured-poverty, while you call the race-card when people try to HELP you improve on something so insignificant as article creation and finding reliable sources on an online encyclopedia. Do you realize how sad that is? Any "struggle" you have is from your own doing, any thought of being a "victim" is, again, your doing. I, and the editors you constantly conflict with, couldn't care less if you are African, Asian, Middle Eastern, white, etc. Be proud of who you are, but don't use it as an excuse to be all high and mighty. All we want is for you to learn and follow simple guidelines that EVERYONE here follows.[[User:TheGracefulSlick|TheGracefulSlick]] ([[User talk:TheGracefulSlick|talk]]) 21:45, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

:Game? So that is what you call it? You put up the notability tag because you thought the article's subject isn't notable. Now you are going to help it? How can you now make it notable? Can't stand by your own reasoning? The right thing to do is to stop harassing me. I asked you repeatedly to stay away from me. You still come around. There are African American's who face real adversity and fight against it by many measures. Some become dead as a result of their fight! Malcolm X and Martin Luther King. I don't care about Syrians like some wikipedians don't care about the struggle of blacks by telling them to stop being a victim! Muslims can do what they want to who they want, so long as they don't infringe upon my people. I am pretty sure you don't know how many blacks died during slavery or being shipped to slavery. How it had led to the disenfranchisement of black families. I don't want to have any conflict with you. I want you to leave me the heck alone. I have said it over 6 months ago. You chooose to follow me around. I don't know you, don't want to be friends with you, and don't want to date you. So what is it that you want with me? do you have any sort of infatuation with me? Tyler David Tincknell [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TheGracefulSlick] leave me alone! [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 02:04, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Ok I wanted to leave you to your own self-pity, but I had to say something about this. First off, the article is terribly written, so I needed to look over reliable sources and ask other users to conclude it barely passed notability. Secondly, if you knew anything about the wonderful history of African-American leaders, you would realize Malcolm X was killed by the very group he originally supported. Your statement about not caring about the Syrian struggle just goes to show you have learned little from MLK Jr.'s teachings. He taught his followers to treat EVERYONE the same, act peaceful, stand together, not as seperate races, but as human beings. MLK was not just active in the black community, he spoke out against war, the genocide in Cambodia, and supporting the homeless. Overall, he wanted a "raceless" society, not a "they want to who they want, so long as they don't infringe upon my people" society you pictured. My point is real civil rights activists are not limited to their own race. He had some great ideas, similar to Gandhi's, maybe you should try actually reading about them. Your ignorance to the leaders and their teachings just show you have little interest in the real cause they stand by. Stop thinking you're so self-righteous and overly important, ok. Read and learn about what is actually going on and maybe you can finally make a difference.[[User:TheGracefulSlick|TheGracefulSlick]] ([[User talk:TheGracefulSlick|talk]]) 03:11, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

::Malcolm X once said ""I'm not going to sit at your table and watch you eat, with nothing on my plate, and call myself a diner. Sitting at the table doesn't make you a diner, unless you eat some of what's on that plate. Being here in America doesn't make you an American.... No I'm not an American, I'm one of the 22 million black people who are the victims of Americanism. One of the 22 million black people who are the victims of democracy, nothing but disguised hypocrisy.... I'm speaking as a victim of this American system. And I see America through the eyes of a victim. I don't see any American dream; I see an American nightmare." [http://www.malcolm-x.org/quotes.htm] So if you keep saying I am a victim, yes I am a victim to the racism that exists on this site that is perpetuated by many wikipedians. [http://www.wired.com/2015/03/wikipedia-sexism/] . Terribly written does not make the article non-notable (I will put up the article for AFD so that I can have the silly notability tag removed since that seems to be the only way). You should learn about Marcus Garvey and how he was shipped out of America, or [[Emitt Till]] or [[Trayvon Martin]]. MLK died and almost 50 years later there is barely a difference. MLK had some good points but he didn't represent all blacks. Many people supported the [[Nation of Islam]]. I don't live in Syria, or India or Cambodia. I live in America. I don't speak arabic, hindi or cambodian, I speak African American Vernacular. Maybe you should spend a few weels in a ghetto in America and you can see the real struggle of things that mentally drain black people. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 03:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

:::Ok so I'm starting to understand your mentality. Your belief is if it's not me (or in this case your race), it's not my problem. You support Malcom X's early views when he sponsored the Nation of Islam, which had a unique way of handle of things, but was actually corrupted in the midst of the civil rights movement of the 1960s. Malcolm X realized this, stopped sponsoring the group, threatened to expose them, and was killed as a result. X actually supported MLK's way in the end. MLK made tremendous headway in the few years he was alive, and you know that as fact if you read anything about the civil rights movement, so your statement makes zero sense. When he died, the civil rights movement tried your method of "it's not my race, not my problem" and used violence against those who opposed them. Of course, if you read, you will remember all the riots and fires that followed and resulted in nothing but destroyed neighborhoods. Great mentality. And which of the three people do you want to discuss? I find Till's terrible injustice to him is the most interesting in terms it may actually have started the 1960s movement, not Rosa Parks as people have come to believe. Oh and I lived in the south side of Philly for 10 years until my brother was killed in a drive by shooting, so I'd rather not go back to the ghettos that took him. But thanks for bringing that up.[[User:TheGracefulSlick|TheGracefulSlick]] ([[User talk:TheGracefulSlick|talk]]) 03:57, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
:Your circular logic and indifference makes no sense to me. I'd rather not hear fictional stories. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 04:01, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
::So I'm guessing you never knew that about Malcolm X, so now you just call pure fact, fiction? I recommend you learn about all of his life to understand the great man you like to quote so much. You can't just deny history when it suits you. History shows your method of "it's not my race, not my problem" and "my race against the world" only resulted in needless violence that hindered our own progress. People respected MLK and his followers, which is why they made progress. I dare you to read about the history of the civil rights movement for the first time, maybe you'll learn something. We still have a long way to go before there is a "colorless" society, where everyone's unique individuality is accepted so it would be best if you knew what is going on.[[User:TheGracefulSlick|TheGracefulSlick]] ([[User talk:TheGracefulSlick|talk]]) 04:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
:Fictional stories are about your ghetto escapades complete with a drive by to give it some "realness". [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 04:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
::Well I still recommend you learn about Malcolm X and the rest above. Interesting man, unfortunate what happened to him by the Nation of Islam. Anyways, I couldn't care less if you think my brother's death is fiction. You're mind is so mixed up that your opinion of facts have no worth to me. Had you held any sensible logic to the issues you spew out, than maybe it would mean something. But you have proved you have no clue what the real struggle is so I don't know how you'd expect me to care for your opinion on my life. Anything else you wish to say or are you finally finished with this embarrassing display?[[User:TheGracefulSlick|TheGracefulSlick]] ([[User talk:TheGracefulSlick|talk]]) 04:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
:Your story about your brother is complete fiction. where did you get that from? A rap song? A movie like [[Menace II Society]] ? If you went through a real struggle you wouldn't try to mock mine with a fictional story about the experience of many black families. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 04:39, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
::Never seen the movie, I guess I'll watch sometime. I listen to 1960s music as you already know, but I'll always give a song at least one try. Hope this week gives you a chance to reflect on more than just your time here, but in your life. You have a lot to learn about.[[User:TheGracefulSlick|TheGracefulSlick]] ([[User talk:TheGracefulSlick|talk]]) 04:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
:What are you talking about? This week off makes no difference to me. I barely edit anymore. Racism on wikipedia ain't a thing to me. Some of the proponents of racism calling me a victim won't stop me. Maybe you will feel lonely being cuz u can't follow me around. Sad Sad for you. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 04:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
::Yes I will feel so sad being able to work in peace. So sad to not worry about how you degrade an article. So sad to not be able to worry about whether you're using a sock puppet. And so sad that I can't watch you defend your actions by blaming everyone else. Definitely, this week will be a struggle, I assure you CrazyAces. I realize this whole time you were trolling and I was feeding it, but to bring this all out in the open will help immensely for the user that will eventually indefinitely block you. Sorry to say, but you obviously are not here to build an encyclopedia so it will happen finally.[[User:TheGracefulSlick|TheGracefulSlick]] ([[User talk:TheGracefulSlick|talk]]) 05:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)


=={{ping|Mdtemp}} ==
I am wondering about people saying that notability isn't inherited. I have a question as to how [[Angelo Dundee]] and [[Greg Jackson (MMA trainer)]] who isn't notable in their own right is an exception. ThankS! [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 08:42, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angelo_Dundee
:*Angelo Dundee is clearly notable. I don't think you understand the not inherited part. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 14:06, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Ok, since I didn't ping you and you decided to reply. Elaborate. Angelo Dundee was a trainer as is Greg Jackson. What did they do in their own right? [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 19:59, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
:*I didn't look at Jackson, which is why my response doesn't mention him. When the BBC, CNN, the Daily Telegraph and the NY Times[http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/02/sports/angelo-dundee-trainer-of-boxing-champions-dies-at-90.html?_r=0] devote that much space to your death, you were notable and pass GNG. It would be a snow keep. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 20:27, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
:*If I were expanding the article, this NPR piece [http://www.npr.org/2012/02/04/146405577/angelo-dundee-more-than-just-a-good-cornerman] and this one from CBS [http://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-angelo-dundee-got-boxers-to-be-their-best/] would be good sources to work with. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 20:57, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
:::How about Greg Jackson? Can you please elaborate on inherited? Thank you [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 22:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
:::::*While Dundee may be primarily known for his role with Ali, it's not the only thing he's known for. He trained many notable fighters, was known for being somewhat unorthodox and got significant media coverage on his own. Merely being associated with another notable person doesn't make their notability inherited. An example of inherited: Frank Lloyd Wright is a very notable architect. Some of the buildings he designed are also notable, but not every building he designed is notable. The ones that are notable are because they had significant coverage in their own right (no pun intended). But if I were to try to create an article about a building solely based on the fact that he designed it, it would be properly pointed out that notability isn't inherited. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 03:56, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
*I haven't looked at Greg Jackson so I'm just going to make some general comments. If someone's only claim to notability is who they trained or were taught by or competed against then you're looking at inherited notability. To be notable on their own, someone must meet [[WP:GNG]]. [[WP:KICK]] provides a good example of having criteria for competitors and for non-competitors.[[User:Mdtemp|Mdtemp]] ([[User talk:Mdtemp|talk]]) 15:19, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
==Disambiguation link notification for December 12==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Santiago Luis Polanco Rodríguez]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Laundered]] ([http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Santiago_Luis_Polanco_Rodr%C3%ADguez check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Santiago_Luis_Polanco_Rodr%C3%ADguez fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 12:39, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

==Creating articles in mainspace==
Hi, CrazyAces. You were banned in July 2015 from creating new articles in mainspace — see the top of this page. As far as I can see, the ban hasn't been revoked. Nevertheless you recently created [[Mitch Santa Maria]], an article that could certainly have benefited from review, directly in mainspace. Perhaps you forgot about your restriction, but it's there for a reason. Please don't let it happen again. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] &#124; [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 10:43, 13 December 2015 (UTC).
*Bearing in mind that within the hour CrazyAces was seeking to have his ban lifted at ANI and that he was creating other pages in his usespace at the same time, I'd suggest that he was well aware of what he was doing. I'd be very interested in an explanation. [[User:Spartaz|Spartaz]] <sup>''[[User talk:Spartaz|Humbug!]]''</sup> 10:57, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
To both {{ping|Bishonen}} and {{ping|Spartaz}}, I was doing too many things at once. Switching between articles and a source that listed all US Olympic Judoka. I was checking to see if they had pages on wikipedia and if not creating pages for them in my userspace. Too much copy and pasting, editing URL's, and switching between various tabs on my browser. As is shown below, it was a total accident. I figure this block won't be lifted. Since no one had responded to the unblock request. It's not like i'm that active anymore. Look at my edit count. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 23:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

== Blocked ==

I blocked you for one week for violation of the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=670649234#Proposed:_CrazyAces489_banned_from_creating_new_articles ban on creating new articles in main space]. I see no evidence of a successful appeal of that ban, and the article {{la|Mitch Santa Maria}} was not, as far as I can tell, created via [[WP:AFC]], the route you were given for creating new articles. Please note that this is a one week block based on the fact that although this appears to be the first violation of this restriction, you were very recently blocked for a week for abuse of multiple accounts. I think you are headed down a dangerous path. People are trying to help you contribute productively, but you seem not to get it. For the avoidance of doubt, [[WP:CLEANSTART]] cannot be used when you are under active restrictions. You are banned from creating new articles, please abide by that ban and follow process. If you're concerned about backlogs then why not just list the AFC submissions on your talk page? There are watchers, and anything genuinely valid will get promoted before the [[WP:DEADLINE]]. You'll also probably get good feedback that will help you write better articles. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 11:05, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed | 1=I admit I did it, but it was a total accident. I was creating a bunch of articles to work on in subpages. If you look at my history, I created about 16 articles via subpages but not for mainspace in a period of about 1 hour (07:24, 12 December 2015 (diff hist) . . (+103)‎ . . N User:CrazyAces489/Corinna Broz TO 08:15, 12 December 2015 (diff hist) . . (+296)‎ . . N User:CrazyAces489/Steve Cohen). https: //en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/CrazyAces489&offset=&limit=500&target=CrazyAces489. By the time, I realized I put one article accidentally in mainspace it was already too late. I am not an admin and can't delete it. I was working a little too quickly going back and forth and a mistake happened. If you look, I haven't put any articles into mainspace since the ban back in July. I have only done redirects. I also asked on AN/I to be allowed to put an article in. Why would I put an article up after being told no? If I didn't care about permission, why would I ask? Now my block for multiple accounts I believe is based on a systematic bias after I was outed when I got a new account. I switched back to my old account and was closing out work on my new account. A number of admins knew about the situation and told me to stick to one account. At no point did the accounts intermingle in the same articles. The fact remains that 5 months later after things had settled down, I was blocked for multiple accounts. Why wasn't the block done before? I was also blocked for "unsubstantiated allegations of racism" when I never said anyone was racist but pointed out out of 7 articles that I had started that were nominated for deletion 6 of the individuals were African American. I was given issues for making articles like [[Racism on Wikipedia]] and for communicating in ebonics. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 16:09, 13 December 2015 (UTC) | decline = "I don't think it matters at this point. It expires in a few hours." - I am closing this request to help clear the category. Ping me if you need anything else. [[User talk:HighInBC|<b style="color:Green">HighInBC</b>]] 04:47, 20 December 2015 (UTC)}}
:I'm not sure what's gone wrong, but a lot of the request is only visible in the edit window. Could be to do with pipe symbols cutting things off. [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 16:43, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
::I've tired to fix it for you by replacing <nowiki>|</nowiki> with <nowiki>{{!}}</nowiki>. —<span style="font-family: serif">'''''[[User:Wasell|<span style="color: #0a0">Wasell</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Wasell|(<span style="color: #e66">T</span>)]]</sup>'''''</span> 17:04, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
:::Thanks for that. I'll try to remember that trick... [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 17:16, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
::::To CrazyAces489: The English language Wikipedia works mainly in the two standard forms British English and American English. There are many other forms such as Geordie and Scouse that aren't used here. There is no reason not to have an Ebonics language Wikipedia where the whole thing is in Ebonics. There is a Scots language Wikipedia - that's spoken and written in Scotland, and it is related to English, but not easily understood by outsiders. Here, we have readers from all round the world who can understand British and American English (which are much closer together than Brit English and Scots). It's not fair to expect people in Australia, India, and so on, who have no contact with Ebonics (as we in the UK don't either) to understand it. I'm not going into the reasons for blocking and unblocking, but if you have an accident again, get in quick and stick a 'one author request' for deletion <nowiki>{{db-g7}}</nowiki> on it - or move it back into user space, and then tag the redirect. No-one could fault you there. [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 17:40, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

FOR Userspce

http://www.nytimes.com/1999/12/26/us/tony-bryant-former-hijacker-turned-castro-foe-dies-at-60.html?_r=0


:This is my SECOND REQUEST, I have waited 5 days for a response as per above! I admit I did it, but it was a total accident. I was creating a bunch of articles to work on in subpages. If you look at my history, I created about 16 articles via subpages but not for mainspace in a period of about 1 hour (07:24, 12 December 2015 (diff {{!}} hist) . . (+103)‎ . . N User:CrazyAces489/Corinna Broz TO 08:15, 12 December 2015 (diff {{!}} hist) . . (+296)‎ . . N User:CrazyAces489/Steve Cohen). https: //en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/CrazyAces489&offset=&limit=500&target=CrazyAces489. By the time, I realized I put one article accidentally in mainspace it was already too late. I am not an admin and can't delete it. I was working a little too quickly going back and forth and a mistake happened. If you look, I haven't put any articles into mainspace since the ban back in July. I have only done redirects. I also asked on AN/I to be allowed to put an article in. Why would I put an article up after being told no? If I didn't care about permission, why would I ask? Now my block for multiple accounts I believe is based on a systematic bias after I was outed when I got a new account. I switched back to my old account and was closing out work on my new account. A number of admins knew about the situation and told me to stick to one account. At no point did the accounts intermingle in the same articles. The fact remains that 5 months later after things had settled down, I was blocked for multiple accounts. Why wasn't the block done before? I was also blocked for "unsubstantiated allegations of racism" when I never said anyone was racist but pointed out out of 7 articles that I had started that were nominated for deletion 6 of the individuals were African American. I was given issues for making articles like [[Racism on Wikipedia]] and for communicating in ebonics. Seems my previous request was ignored [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 14:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
: One unblock request at a time please. Opening multiple requests is as useful as repeatedly pressing the "Walk" button at a crosswalk. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 15:11, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

::{{ping|JzG}} I am just going through [[:Category:Requests_for_unblock]] looking at stale requests. What do you think of the explanation given? [[User talk:HighInBC|<b style="color:Green">HighInBC</b>]] 21:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
::: Colour me unconvinced, but feel free to take to ANI. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 23:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
::::No intention of taking it anywhere. [[User talk:HighInBC|<b style="color:Green">HighInBC</b>]] 01:30, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
::{{ping|HighInBC}} I don't think it matters at this point. It expires in a few hours. (10:57, 13 December 2015 JzG (talk | contribs) blocked CrazyAces489 (talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 week (account creation blocked) (Violation of article creation ban)) I made 2 requests. It seems like it was totally ignored. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 22:56, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
:::Sometimes requests fall between the cracks, sorry about that. [[User talk:HighInBC|<b style="color:Green">HighInBC</b>]] 01:30, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
:{{ping|HighInBC}} To be honest, enough admins have replied to convo's on this page to make me doubt that. I have pinged a few admins after the block to no reply. I even put in another request and it was reverted. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACrazyAces489&type=revision&diff=695781324&oldid=695776663] I am not saying anything about you, but I feel that there are some grudges being held against me. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 04:28, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

::I am sorry to hear that. I found your by going through the stale unblock requests. I managed to bring it from 30 unreviewed to 26. [[User talk:HighInBC|<b style="color:Green">HighInBC</b>]] 04:34, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

{{ping|HighInBC}} You could do the unblock as well and I can do the last few things I wanted to do earlier like request that the deleted page that was accidently posted as a subpage. Also, have a check user put up to prove that I didn't sockpuppet. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 05:45, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

:I have not heard of any sock puppetry issues. I was not planning to unblock you, it seems you did violate the topic ban. JzG is unconvinced by your explanation and I am in the same boat. [[User talk:HighInBC|<b style="color:Green">HighInBC</b>]] 06:17, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
technically, I did. not on purpose. [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489]] ([[User talk:CrazyAces489#top|talk]]) 07:43, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

== Why get involved? ==
== Why get involved? ==


Revision as of 06:02, 27 December 2015

Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Why get involved?

You have every right to vote for deletion any article you wish, but I wonder why waste the time. I have never voted to delete one of your articles, and never have nominated any one of them for deletion. Though I am proud to call TheGracefulSlick a friend, and have gladly defended him when he was under attack, I have never done anything detrimental to your cause and have tried to talk him out of being involved with your issues. I feel that he and I should focus on music--and you should focus on sports. We all cover obscure figures, so I am of the opinion that none of us should be notability hawks or deletionsits. My personal opinion is that both you and he should just focus on the topics of your disciplines and not get involved in all of this Wiki-fundamentalism and Wiki-witchtrial stuff. Garagepunk66 (talk) 19:50, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel that he should be away from me and vice versa why not support the interaction ban at [1]. It would totally keep me away from any articles that the both of you are at and vice versa. He has no interest in sports, martial arts or black figures but constantly comes to my specific articles. CrazyAces489 (talk) 00:46, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to talk to him. I think his whole thing is that he'd like to see you take more time and care with your edits. Clearly from hearing you speak in the discussions, you are very intelligent and articulate, and have great command of facts--qualities that he feels could be well-used in your articles. Personally, I don't make a habit of interjecting in other editors' affairs unless it is regarding an article that I am working on--i.e. when I have a respectful disagreement about content in an article I am working on (I can become then a fierce debater--but I always try to keep things non-personal and civil, even then). By the way, I respect your passion for black empowerment. I think that many well-meaning white people have a blind spot about race--even well meaning liberals. I don't think that most whites appreciate the degree to which practically every single black person in this country is constantly subjected to racism, slights, and humiliations, whether overt, covert, personal, or systematic on a daily basis. I realize that black people have to live the daily curse of having people look at them strangely, cops stopping them, even when they may be educated and affluent, people not wanting to hire them, along with all of the other economic inequalities. I can say emphatically that TheGracefulSlick is not a racist and hates racism--he was passionately angered about the Freddie Gray incident. But, like so many of us white folk--he just has to have more quality interactions with black people and see the black perspective more, that's all. I do think that you and he are caught up in a vicious cycle of angry emotions, where you each cannot see the goodness in the other person. There seems to be no way to untangle the knot of misunderstanding that has strangled and poisoned both of your interactions with each other. Garagepunk66 (talk) 05:05, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CrazyAces489&oldid=696961802"