User talk:Cryptic/archive-7: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m rv malfunctioning bots
m Question.
Line 1: Line 1:
Why are you deleting my pages, why are eradicating my family, and why don't
<!--
resepect my work on the pages you deleted? I have no copies. Please send m

back the info you deleted.
Please place new messages AT THE BOTTOM, not here. Thanks.

-->
{{divbox|blue|Archives|3={{User talk:Cryptic/archives}}}}
{{divbox|green|2=I usually reply here if you ask here.<div style='float:right;'>[[b:User talk:Cryptic|b]] [[commons:User talk:Cryptic|c]] [[wikt:User talk:Cryptic|d]] [[m:User talk:Cryptic|m]] [[s:User talk:Cryptic|s]]</div>|3=If you prefer me to move the entire conversation to your talk page, so that you get the "new messages" box when I reply, please say so. If I ask something of you on ''your'' talk page, I'll watch it so I see any replies there.<br/><br/>Also, I prefer to keep my primary email address somewhat hidden, rather than use aggressive spam filtering. Thus, if I've blocked you, I'll reply on your talk page (which you'll still be able to edit) instead of by email.}}
<!--

Please place new messages AT THE BOTTOM, not here. Thanks.

-->

==Closure of TfD discussion on {{tl|Greene}}==
<!--

Please place new messages AT THE BOTTOM, not here. Thanks.

-->
I see you just closed this discussion. I would agree with you that there was no consensus to delete; however, I think the clear consensus was that the content did not belong in template space, but should be moved to user space. I have no problem with that resolution, which should have been implemented. [[User:Agent 86|Agent 86]] 22:58, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
:There was no consensus on whether it should be userfied or kept outright - dead even support for both, in fact, even assuming everyone who wanted it deleted preferred userfication. This is why I closed it as no consensus instead of keep, despite overwhelming support not to delete. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 23:01, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
::Thanks for considering my request. I've posted a comment about this at [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#.22Userfication.22_of_.7B.7BGreene.7D.7D|WP:AN]], if you care to look or comment. [[User:Agent 86|Agent 86]] 23:56, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

== Please join in on the conversation... ==

...and perhaps [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Notability_%28web%29&curid=2159945&diff=104258806&oldid=104256552 explain where said consensus exists]? Seriously, please. It looks bad to just keep reverting and not explain your edits when you haven't chimed in, and the consensus ''isn't there''. The other places he even mentions in the initial note were all reverted back, too! --[[User:Badlydrawnjeff|badlydrawnjeff]] <small>[[User_talk:Badlydrawnjeff|talk]]</small> 04:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

:As mentioned at [[Wikipedia talk:Notability (web)#Bringing this in line with larger consensus]] - and in accordance with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Notability_%28web%29&diff=next&oldid=102958353 your "best case scenario"], in fact - it was thoroughly discussed at [[Wikipedia_talk:Notability#Let's discuss the relationship between primary notability criterion and other criteria]]. There, I see 100% - 1 support for the change, and not inconsiderable support for going further - that is, requiring the primary notability criterion ''plus'' one or more of the secondaries. Just how long do you plan to filibuster against it? &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 04:47, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
::I don't feel I'm filibustering at all, actually. There is a good deal of pushback against the change in your first link mainly because of the lack of consensus, and you're misrepresenting my "best case scenario" to boot - I'm referring to having all "notability" point to WP:N instead of the individual, and we aren't ready for that, obviously. Moving on, your third link does not come close to addressing the issues at the individual pages - discussion at WP:N cannot circumvent discussion at WP:WEB, it doesn't have special powers or veto power over the individual criteria, and there isn't 100% support for the change, or one person opposing, or anything like that. The consensus does not exist to make such a drastic change to our criteria, period. Why must you move against consensus? --[[User:Badlydrawnjeff|badlydrawnjeff]] <small>[[User_talk:Badlydrawnjeff|talk]]</small> 04:53, 30 January 2007 (UTC)



== TfD nomination of Template:{{ucfirst:HistSource}} ==

[[Template:{{ucfirst:HistSource}}]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:HistSource|the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page]]. Thank you.<!-- Tfdnotice -->.

This new template functionally does the same as Catholic-link which was deleted. I just put it up for TfD and notified all users who took part in the old vote, but I am not sure if it qualifies as speedy, since the new template is functionally the same as the old one. I would hate to be playing wack-a-mole with JASpencer, he also created [[:Category:Articles that could be expanded from the Catholic Encyclopedia]], which also functionally does the same thing as the old Catholic-link template. -- [[User:Stbalbach|Stbalbach]] 00:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

== Fix anchor ==

Interesting... doesn't an anchor with a space in it work in your browser? It seems to work fine in mine. [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><font color="#DD0000">&gt;<font color="#FF6600">R<font color="#FF9900">a<font color="#FFCC00">d<font color="#FFEE00">i</font>a</font>n</font>t</font>&lt;</font></b>]] 15:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
:It didn't when I tried it from the diff, though it is now (both looking at the old revision, and in the diff). I'm thoroughly confused. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 15:26, 31 January 2007 (UTC)



==Deletion review of an AfD decision you commented on==
This [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marsden-Donnelly harassment case|AfD]] you commented on is currently on [[Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_January_27#Marsden-Donnelly_harassment_case|deletion review]]. ~ [[User:Trialsanderrors|trialsanderrors]] 19:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

== Thanks ==

Indeed [[Percy Everett]] was never a speedy deletion target. I'm glad you saw it my way too. <span style="color:#B03060;"><i>[[User:Wimvandorst|Wim van Dorst'']] ([[user talk:Wimvandorst|''Talk'']])</i></span> 23:31, 3 February 2007 (UTC).

== CHICOTW ==

<table align=center style="float:center; border:1px solid #8888aa; background-color:#efefef; text-align:lift; font-size:110%; padding:3px" width=900>
<tr>
<td style="border-bottom:0px solid; background:#efefef;" align="left">{{border|[[Image:Municipal Flag of Chicago.svg|37px|Flag of Chicago]]}}
<td style="border-bottom:0px solid; background:#efefef;">
<center>'''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/COTW|Chicago Collaboration of the Week]]'''</center>
<td style="border-bottom:0px solid; background:#efefef;" align="right">{{border|[[Image:Municipal Flag of Chicago.svg|40px|Flag of Chicago]]}}</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" bgcolor=f8f8ff>
<center><div style="font-size: 85%">In the past you have edited '''[[Little Italy, Chicago]]'''. This week it has been selected as the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/COTW|WikiProject Chicago Collaboration of the week]]. Each week a [[Chicago]] related article in need of attention is selected as the Chicago COTW. Feel free to come help us improve it towards the quality level of a Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:Featured articles|featured article]]. Your input in [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago/COTW#Nominations|future selections]] would also be appreciated. See the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/COTW/To Do|To Do List]] to suggest a change or to see an open tasks list.</div>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-bottom:0px solid; background:#efefef;" align="left">{{border|[[Image:Municipal Flag of Chicago.svg|37px|Flag of Chicago]]}}<td style="border-bottom:0px solid; background:#efefef;">
<center>'''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago]]'''</center>
<td style="border-bottom:0px solid; background:#efefef;" align="right">{{border|[[Image:Municipal Flag of Chicago.svg|40px|Flag of Chicago]]}}</td>
</tr>
</center>
</table> [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] 00:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

== [[Peekvid]] and [[Peekvid.com]] ==

Hi there. Sorry to trouble you but could you please unfreeze Peekvid and redirect it to Peekvid.com because the current situation is a little silly.

Yours,

[[User:David Spart|David Spart]] 12:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

==Thank you==
Thank you for blocking 71.99.92.66, as I was frightened of getting into a bunch of reverts which would lead to myself being blocked, which I didn't much want to occur. [[User:Bobo192|Bobo]][[User talk:Bobo192|.]] 13:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
:If the edits are disruptive enough that reverting them with the administrator rollback tool is justified - and they were; irregardless of the whether the page title should have the diacritic or not (a legitimate content dispute), a line at the start of the article saying, in prose, that it should be at the other title is useless at best or trolling at worst - then there's no reason to worry about tripping 3rr. If you'd blocked him or semiprotected the article yourself, I can't imagine anyone would have so much as raised an eyebrow. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 03:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
::Once again, thank you for your clarification and your dealing with the user while I was reverting his edits. [[User:Bobo192|Bobo]][[User talk:Bobo192|.]] 07:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

== vandalism on the [[QANTM]] page==

how can you call informing people about the truth vandalism, i would really like to know, because you have it all wrong <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Metil ed|Metil ed]] ([[User talk:Metil ed|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Metil ed|contribs]]) 13:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->


i can see where you are coming from but, people need to know, would it be better if i write the information in a more formal manner, maybe under a new section of the qantm page.
i am not trying to cause trouble rather inform people of facts that they will otherwise not know until its too late.
:This material belongs on the page only if it can be [[WP:V|verified]] from [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. Stray anonymous complaints will neither be allowed on Wikipedia, nor convince anyone of anything even if they were to stay. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 13:30, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

ok fair enough, but the fact that i am a student their already makes it reliable does it not, how to i go about getting it verified, qantm id cards, to prove im a student, more detailed description of the situation.

or should i just give up because your not going to let me post this
:Please see our [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and [[WP:NOR|no original research]] policies. Insistence from Some Guy On The Internet that he is a student, and thus whatever he says must be true, is insufficient for inclusion in a Wikipedia article. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 13:35, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

and thus some dude who has no affiliation whatsoever with the company decides that he is right, even though he has no clue, that is supposed to be reliable aswell. its the same dilema that never ends, i could establish myself elsewhere with some fancy name and credentials and have more of a chance of being believed, but because im honest and trying to do a service to the community i am by default considered some guy who thinks he is right. so this make me wonder how many other wiki pages are subject to such in justice. well no point trying any more because its clear that you know everything, in fact you know what im saying is not true, and you know that im not a student and you know that im just here to cause trouble. but i have no idea how you can know that. hmm i wonder do you have any reliable sources to back those claims up. i think not. just a thought next time you jump to conclusions. have a nice day

=="What links here" counter==
Hello Cryptic, I saw your response on [[User talk:Uncle G]]. I am familiar with the 5000 trick but unfortunately the "what links here" I'm after is in the hundreds of thousands and that's not a practical method to arrive at a number. If it isn't too much of a bother to modify your software to do something like that it would be appreciated. I created and have extensively developed [[Template:Tnavbar]] and now I'm quite curious to know to what extent it has been adopted here on en. Wikipedia. Some time ago I hand counted using the 5000 trick up to 100,000 and then just let it go. Thanks. {{User:Netscott/s1.js}} 12:53, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

:OK, hrm, my function's not really the best way to go about it, then - it just uses the 5000 trick itself, and knows enough to keep fetching more whatlinkshere pages until it runs out. It won't be any faster or less hard on the servers than if a human was doing it, and 100,000+ links is well past the point where getting a count this way is a good idea.

:IIRC, the from field (or was it offset?) in Special:Whatlinkshere used to take a numeric offset, not an article id, so you used to be able to go to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Whatlinkshere/User_talk:Cryptic&limit=500&from=15000 and get a list of the 500 backlinks starting at position 15000, but annoyingly enough that doesn't work anymore. Grng.

:What you ''really'' want is to be able to run a query like "<tt>SELECT COUNT(*) FROM pagelinks WHERE pl_namespace=</tt>''namespace''<tt> AND pl_title='</tt>''title''<tt>';</tt>", with ''namespace'' being the numeric namespace (e.g., User talk: is 4) and ''title'' being the page's title sans namespace (e.g., for here it would be 'Cryptic', not 'User talk:Cryptic').

:(This will only count non-template-transclusion links; to get a count of those, you want "<tt>SELECT COUNT(*) FROM templatelinks WHERE tl_namespace=</tt>''namespace''<tt> AND tl_title='</tt>''title''<tt>';</tt>" instead.)

:Going on the assumption that you don't need a fully-up-to-date count - I can't imagine that pages with 100,000+ links change by much all ''that'' often, or that an exact count is crucial - then anyone with a [[m:toolserver|toolserver]] account should be able to run the query. The toolserver's database is about a month out of date, as I understand it.

:If you ''do'' need an up-to-date count, you'll have to try to pester a developer into adding this to Special:Whatlinkshere, or to a separate special page. It might be a good idea in any case; people are probably just looking for a count in a fair number of whatlinkshere queries, and I can't imagine that fetching a full list of pages is easier on the system than just the count. (On the other hand, the wiki I have handy to test this on only has ~1000 pages and my sql experience is decidedly on the slim side, so I could be totally off.) &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 16:52, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

== {{tl|unbv}} ==

Hey ... I went ahead and retargeted {{tl|unbv}}. It makes sense as a redirect. I have gone through the block log for the last month and it has no uses in that time. Also, looking at the history for that redirect, it used to be redirected to something similar to the new template. Please feel free to change it back if you think retargeting it is a really bad idea, but if nobody has used this redirect in the last two weeks and it has no current transclusions, I think we should be ok. --[[User:BigDT|BigDT]] 20:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

thanks for your assistance on that autoblock, cryptic. [[User_talk:Derex|Derex]] 12:31, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

== {{vandal|Ruralendeed}} ==

Have a look at contribs, seems like a vandal-only SPA. Found RFA pretty early on in his career, eh. &ndash; [[User talk:Chacor|Chacor]] 16:37, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

== Thanks ==

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Community_noticeboard/Essjay&curid=9808423&diff=112116459&oldid=112116320 Thanks for this]. Guess I should've just left it alone and let someone else dig through the history, eh? --[[User:Cyde|<font color="#ff66ff">'''Cyde Weys'''</font>]] 17:53, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

== Essjay RfC strawpoll ==

FYI, I didn't really want to use a hidden version for the archive of the straw poll. I may have moved too fast and in too many steps, but I did switch it to a non-collapsed version on my own. My using multiple edits to avoid edit conflicts probably contributed to your sense that I was hiding the material, and I should have stopped and taken to time to find the perfect archive templates instead of using the collapsed ones while I looked for better. My apologies to you. [[User:GRBerry|GRBerry]] 22:16, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

== Condom picture deleted! ==

You deleted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Image:Condoms_by_Morrhigan.jpg this image] today with the summary that it had no image. It had an image for years, and was used in both the [[Condom#Form|condom]] and [[Birth control#Barrier methods|birth control]] articles. Any idea what could have happened to it? [[User:Lyrl|Lyrl]] <sup> [[User talk:Lyrl|Talk]] </sup> <sub> [[Special:Contributions/Lyrl|C]] </sub> 04:05, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
:It was [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=&page=Image%3ACondoms_by_Morrhigan.jpg deleted on Commons]. The actual image was (so far as I can tell) never on Wikipedia proper; the page at [[:Image:Condoms_by_Morrhigan.jpg]] started out as a misplaced {{tl|sxc-warning}}. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 04:09, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
::Thank you for the explanation, that makes sense. How disappointing, though. [[User:Lyrl|Lyrl]] <sup> [[User talk:Lyrl|Talk]] </sup> <sub> [[Special:Contributions/Lyrl|C]] </sub> 15:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

==Survey Invitation==
Hi there, I am a research student from the [[National University of Singapore]] and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the [http://www-appn.comp.nus.edu.sg/~seahruho/ research home page]. Thank you. --[[User:WikiInquirer|WikiInquirer]] 04:08, 4 March 2007 (UTC)<sup>[[User talk:WikiInquirer|talk to me]]</sup>

== Thanks for reverting ==

I was just in the process of reverting my self - I hadn't noticed it was a closed Rfd as it had only been open for 12 minutes. - regards - [[User:Munta|Munta]] 00:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

==Deletion of [[TOMS shoes]]==

You probably should have at least opened the topic for conversation prior to deletion. It doesn't make any sense to simply delete an article for no good reason. I rewrote the article today, because originally it was written like an advert. The company has been featured in Vogue magazine, [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1582305,00.html Time] magazine, the Los Angeles Times, Star Magazine and other popular journals. To cite rule A7 as if the organization is insignificant is unfounded, and at least should be a topic of debate prior to your abrupt decision to delete it. - [[User:Derondantzler|Deron Dantzler]] 02:00, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
:I did see that it was rewritten, but the article still didn't claim importance or significance. This isn't a judgement on whether the company actually ''is'' important and significant or not, but a triage of whether secondary sources are likely to exist. The article cited only the company's own website and a YouTube video, of all things; had it mentioned the Time or Vogue stories, or indicated that it was anything other than just-another-company that made just-another-corporate-donation, I wouldn't have deleted it. I'll restore it forthwith. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 02:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
::Thanks, sorry for not citing prior. - [[User:Derondantzler|Deron Dantzler]] 02:33, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

== request indef and talk page protection ==

on a user you recently blocked.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:HideandLeek&diff=113785535&oldid=113665635] <span style="white-space: nowrap">— [[User:Coelacan|coe<span style="font-variant: small-caps">l</span>]][[User talk:Coelacan|acan]]</span> — 17:52, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
:I don't see the case for user page protection - and certainly not for an indef block - based on that remark alone, especially since he's made positive contributions in the past. If he starts to go berserk again after his current week-long block runs out, I'll extend it then. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 03:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

== Why are you deleting my pages? ==

It seems that you are deleting pages because they are not linked but I don't get a chance to link them properly. Please advise. Thanks! <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Rdbuckley|Rdbuckley]] ([[User talk:Rdbuckley|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rdbuckley|contribs]]) 00:24, 15 March 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->

==Music notability==
Hi, I sent this message to a previous admin but anyway. I received a message regarding the deletion of the ''G-Unit Radio'' series albums. Apparantly, it failed the notability guidelines. However, the [[WP:MUSIC|guidelines]] say that "''the general consensus on notability of albums is that if the musician or ensemble that made them is considered notable, then their albums have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia''." The album guidelines simply state that albums by notable artists are considered notable. I first created the article without knowing it had been previously deleted. Then I received a message from [[User:Fram|Fram]] saying if they are to be re-created, it should state how it is notable. Thus, I re-created the page showing how it's notable by virtue of that fact that the artists are notable (as said in the guidelines). I honestly don't see how this is breaking any rules. [[User:Spellcast|Spellcast]] 05:03, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

== [[Square (slang)]] ==

That idiot vandal is back today. I reverted him once. You might need to semi-protect again, if he persists. [[User:Wahkeenah|Wahkeenah]] 00:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

== [[Emcee T]] article recreated (?) ==

I suspect that [[EMCEE T (MC T)]] is a recreation of the article above which you deleted in January. I found the other spelling (Emcee T) when I attempted to move the EMCEE T (MC T) article to properly name it. Could you take a look?--[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] 22:28, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
:Saw your note, have posted with the other admin who was listed ([[User:Trialsanderrors]]) Thanks--[[User:DO11.10|DO11.10]] 22:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

== BattleMaster game page ==

Please tell me why did you delete the page of BattleMaster game? I did explain clearly in the discussion why I restore this page. If you missed it then you can read also on [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion]] p.# 11 "Battlemaster game page". Shortly, why THIS game page is deleted while the others are kept? WHAT should I do to keep this page. Give me an example of the MMOG article that fills all the necessary requirements, because atm I don't see any difference between BattleMaster article and other articles from MMOG category. So, what are the rules? Are there any rules for articles about the games? [[User:Merewyn|Merewyn]] 20:54, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

:: OK, you deleted and protected my article. But I asked for something. TELL ME what should I do to make this article compatible with any rules and KEEP it?? [[User:Merewyn|Merewyn]] 17:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

:::: I hate to be ignored....
::::An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|BattleMaster}}}|deletion review]] of [[:BattleMaster]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. [[User:Merewyn|Merewyn]] 11:21, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

== Thanks.. ==

.. for the talk page revert. I owe you one. Cheers, [[User:A Train|<b><span style="background:#11117D;color:white">A</span></b> <span style="color:#11117D">Train</span>]]<sup>''[[User talk:A Train|talk]]</sup> 17:21, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

== CSD pastel boxes ==
Eh, in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion&diff=next&oldid=120073010 this edit] you stated that "People make hopeless cases for unneeded changes to this policy literally all the time". If you think that the clarification to R2 is hopeless, please say so on the talk page. Otherwise, perhaps you were only referring to the A7 change. I added the R2-related box, but someone else (gah) mimicked me with the A7. So if there's any reason why the former is unneeded and hopeless, either say so, or make sure the edit summary works for everyone <code>:)</code> Thanks, [[User:Gracenotes|<font color="#960">Grace</font><font color="#000">notes</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Gracenotes|<font color="#960">T</font>]]</sup> § 16:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
:It was mostly about the A7 change, and I probably shouldn't've been so irritable when I removed them, but I'd been up for thirty hours. <tt>:)</tt> &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 20:50, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
::Goodness. That's a lot! Well, thanks for your response. Cheers, [[User:Gracenotes|<font color="#960">Grace</font><font color="#000">notes</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Gracenotes|<font color="#960">T</font>]]</sup> § 02:37, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

== Wikipedia:Notability (web) ==

Thanks for the cleanup! --[[User:Kevin Murray|Kevin Murray]] 19:38, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

== {{{ ? ==

Hello. Seeing as how you're reading my talk page, and I've not been very active for a while, could you tell me what {{{ ... }}} means? What did the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASplash&diff=121225338&oldid=121077642 header] of the edit to my talk mean? Why is it useful? Is there somewhere I can readify it? So many questions! [[User:Splash|Splash]] - [[User talk:Splash|tk]] 20:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
:It's an artifact of [[Template:Spam-warn-deletion]] (and most all of the other I've-just-tagged-this-page-as-a-csd warning templates). What happened was there was a big fight over whether these warning templates should automatically include a section header or not, and as a compromise it was made to only appear if a "header" parameter was supplied to the template. Then someone got the bright idea of making the header name configurable in the template using a "header-text" parameter, but still providing a default value so that users of the template didn't ''have'' to explicitly use the parameter. The problem is that, when a template is substed using default parameter, the source wikitext for the template isn't fully substed, so you get <nowiki>{{{header-text|[[:Aluminij]]}}} instead of just [[:Aluminij]]</nowiki>. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 21:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
:I 'see', thanks. Talk about spoiling the broth. I'm sure that there was once a feature in MediaWiki that allowed the use of a keyboard for leaving simple messages to people you wanted to talk to. Should ask for that to be re-enabled. <tt>:)</tt> [[User:Splash|Splash]] - [[User talk:Splash|tk]] 21:29, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

== Packing Slips ==
Cryptic, I know you're not around too much (nor am I), but I was hoping you could take a quick peek at my recent [[packing slip]] entry, since I made an inclusive ref to it within [[drop shipping]]. Thanks! --[[User:LeroyWilkins|LeroyWilkins]] 04:03, 9 April 2007 (UTC)



== Note ==

I'm mystified by how you reached the conclusion that you did in your oppose comment. As I've stated repeatedly during this RfB, I see the end goal as an opening up of RfA to users of lesser experience who get turned away because of editcountitis-style opposers. I've long argued that RfA set standards too high (arbitrarily) and that it kept moving the goal posts. I'm not running to shoehorn in the cabal's own nominees (to coin a phrase); the present crop of bureaucrats hardly needs any help doing that. As I said in my reply, please oppose me if you disagree, but please ''disagree'' with me first. Yours, [[User:Mackensen|Mackensen]] [[User_talk:Mackensen|(talk)]] 17:25, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Side note, I've blocked your fan club for 24 hours. [[User:Mackensen|Mackensen]] [[User_talk:Mackensen|(talk)]] 18:31, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

==Thanks==

Appreciate the prot on that talk page, Cryptic. --[[User:Dennisthe2|'''<span style="background:Orange;color:Black">Dennis The Tiger</span>''']] ([[User talk:Dennisthe2|Rawr]] and [[Special:Contributions/Dennisthe2|stuff]]) 20:05, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

----
You're mean. I don't want to be your [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiFriend]] anymore. --[[User:24.235.229.208|24.235.229.208]] 20:58, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

==[[Mcgee]]==

Hey, is there any way I can add the article Mcgee without it getting deleted? I mean, there are many different products on wikipedia. There was really no reason to delete my article. Can I restart it but change it so it does not seem like I am copywriting or what ever I did last time that made it get deleted? I don't know what blatant advertising means, but please, just let me add it! <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Aaron Pepin|Aaron Pepin]] ([[User talk:Aaron Pepin|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aaron Pepin|contribs]]) 20:41, 14 April 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->
:That's not [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Mcgee why I deleted it]. Include a credible assertion of importance or significance and it won't be speedied. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 00:19, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

==[[Template:pnc]] nominated for deletion ==
See [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Template:pnc]] for the discussion, which will certainly spill over into larger issues. Your thoughts would be appreciated. --[[User:Kevin Murray|Kevin Murray]] 23:21, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
==Lack of civility==
Your lack of civility in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ATemplates_for_deletion%2FLog%2F2007_April_19&diff=124063068&oldid=124062292 this commentary] is extremely unhelpful. Kindly refrain from further demonstrations. Thank you. {{User:Netscott/s1.js}} 12:03, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
:The harsh language was clearly not a personal attack, but a display of astonishment. --[[User:Dschwen|Dschwen]] 18:41, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
::I agree. ''Sometimes'' you have to smack a mule with a 2-by-4 to get its attention. But be cautious about going "below the line" too often. [[User:Wahkeenah|Wahkeenah]] 03:05, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
:Please comment on [[Wikipedia:Community_sanction_noticeboard#Tendentious_editing_by_User:Netscott]]. [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><font color="#0000DD">&gt;<font color="#0066FF">R<font color="#0099FF">a<font color="#00CCFF">d<font color="#00EEFF">i</font>a</font>n</font>t</font>&lt;</font></b>]] 15:49, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

== Spoiler script ==

I'm using your spoiler script, and I like it. Just two minor points: I would like to have the ability to have spoilers initially hidden. Your script already has a variable for this, but since it's in the script itself, it's not very useful. Perhaps you could allow variables to be set in the user's monobook.js or something.

Secondly, Sometimes an article doesn't have an endspoiler tag. In this case, wouldn't it be better if things like See also sections and References did not disappear? Lots of thanks in advance, [[User:Gerbrant|Shinobu]] 06:41, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

== Edit summary ==

I hope [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AProtected_titles%2FOld_SALT%2FList&diff=124452109&oldid=123953937 this] wasn't directed at me. I added all those pages from a bot created list of salted ''pages'', not redirects. I also did this to over 500 pages, making it hard for me to check whatlinkshere on any of them. Links are supposed to be removed when salting takes place. I also do not see how this could possibly be my fault. '''[[User:Cbrown1023|<font color="green">Cbrown1023</font>]]''' <small>'''<font color="#002bb8">[[User talk:Cbrown1023|talk]]</font>'''</small> 21:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
:Ah, I understand it now. But still, all of the pages should have had their own "Deletedpage"s. Protected redirects are for redirecting to legitimate pages, not other "deleted pages". '''[[User:Cbrown1023|<font color="green">Cbrown1023</font>]]''' <small>'''<font color="#002bb8">[[User talk:Cbrown1023|talk]]</font>'''</small> 21:41, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

== Your edit on Starships ==

I want to thank you for the banner you placed on [[Starships!]]. I think it's more appropriate than the other one. It gave me a good feeling. I like creating articles, but it become less fun if I feel like I'm defending the article constantly. I feel that editors are more likely to make helpful contributions to a page (including sourcing) they are more likely to do so if they don't feel that there is a constant threat of deletion hanging over their heads at all times. Your edit is a very good compromise to the dilemma we had, and I thank you for it. Nice Job! [[User:Matt Brennen|Matt Brennen]] 23:27, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

== A reply to the edit summary of... ==

…[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Badlydrawnjeff_2&diff=125016884&oldid=125011299 this edit]. You can thank [[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] for that. &mdash; [[User:Springeragh|<span style="background:#808;color:#fff;text-decoration:none;">&nbsp;'''''$PЯING'''''</span>]][[User talk:Springeragh|<span style="background:#808;color:#fff;text-decoration:none;">rαgђ&nbsp;</span>]] 23:56, 23 April 2007 (UTC)


==Why did you Delete the entry on TV Stocks Online?==

As far as I can tell, that page was noteworthy and if it was in need of revision or correction, should have been put up for discussion rather than a blanket deletion without any discussion. If that page was not noteworthy, then you should also delete [[HSX]] and [[Newsfutures]] as well as [[Stock market simulator]] because they fall into the same category and have no real value to this online encyclopedia either.--[[User:DragonChi|DragonChi]] 12:36, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

==Long overdue thanks==
I found your comment on my RFA especially gratifying. In addition to other kind words, your mentioning of Irving Crane was great—someone actually read the article and appreciated it! (it's sometimes hard to tell). Please feel free to drop by my talk page for any reason.--[[User:Fuhghettaboutit|Fuhghettaboutit]] 14:48, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

==Elton Brown==
Thanks for clearing out that copyvio so quickly. -[[User:Hit bull, win steak|Hit bull, win steak]]<sup>[[User talk:Hit bull, win steak|(Moo!)]]</sup> 15:56, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

==Review Dead Awaken==
An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|Dead_Awaken}}}|deletion review]] of [[:Dead_Awaken]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. [[User:74.72.119.9|74.72.119.9]] 22:51, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

== Rockin the red link ==

Boowah. --[[User:Jeffrey O. Gustafson|Jeffrey O. Gustafson]] - ''[[User:Jeffrey O. Gustafson/Shazaam|Shazaam!]]'' - [[User_Talk:Jeffrey O. Gustafson|&lt;*&gt;]] 08:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

==Rice College copyvio==
Looking at the <nowiki>{{copyvio}}</nowiki> template it now seems obvious that I should've blanked the page (as "the previous content of this page" would imply), but since there's no explicit instruction to do so in the template, it didn't occur to me at the time (and it's also the first time I've ever had to use it). Anyway, thanks for the heads-up. I'll know better next time. [[User:Fordmadoxfraud|Ford MF]] 16:21, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
:The canonical instructions are at [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems#Instructions]]. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 16:23, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

==Keegan==
Keegan de Lancie is commonly known by his first name, then? [[User:AvatarMN|AvatarMN]] 17:53, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

==Please review the deletion of the page "Pos Solutions"==
The company website is
www.possolutions.com.au
[[User:SoniaZ|SoniaZ]] 15:13, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

==Dekimasu==

I think you're supposed to add the unambiguous word "Support". (Or something else, as the case may be.) -- [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] 10:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
:Unnecessary; my comment could hardly be viewed as anything else. (Especially with RFA still stupidly segregating supports and opposes like it was a vote.) Also see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_May_4&diff=128414429&oldid=128413250 here]. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 10:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Uh, I never invoked "common sense" when I made the suggestion. My own RfA farce had a hiccup when one solemn soul pointed out that I hadn't "signed" my agreement to it all. Incidentally, I admired the spunk of the nominee (I forget his name; do please remind me if you happen to remember) who recently refused to answer any of the questions. -- [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] 11:15, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
:[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ragesoss]]. He impressed me, too; I don't comment on RFAs for people I haven't bumped into beforehand, but I was quite tempted here. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 11:23, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
::That's him (or her), yes. (Thank you for the link.) I got to it late and thought I'd vote "support", but then I thought I really should read through the "oppose"s, and the prospect was just too boring so I surfed elsewhere. -- [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] 11:39, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

==Dibs==

I call dibs on the DIBS page!

== [[WMLZ-LP]] ==
This is slightly frustrating. I had already cleared the page to be recreated by the original deleting admin provided that the original issue raised was not raised again (which it wasn't). You've listed (as the second reason for deletion) that the page was similiar to the original, which is possible, but did not pose the same problem as the prior version (in my understanding). You also listed (as the first reason for deletion), that the group was non-notable. Frankly, the group is irrelevant. The -station- is notable because it is FCC licensed, as indicated [http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/fmq?call=WMLZ here]. If this page is not to be made, so-be-it, and protect it against re-creation again. Otherwise, I'd like a better explanation. Thanks. [[User:JPG-GR|JPG-GR]] 04:07, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|WMLZ-LP}}}|deletion review]] of [[:WMLZ-LP]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. [[User:JPG-GR|JPG-GR]] 04:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

== {{user|KingChronic}} ==

Good afternoon ([[GMT]] time); I'd just like to know what your thoughts were when you blocked {{vandal|KingChronic}} &ndash; the user has no contributions whatsoever, as well as no logs, and yet he/she is being blocked for Keyspam ... I've unblocked for the moment, as I see no motive for an indefinite block whatsoever; if there's some hidden reason I'm not seeing, I'll happily undo myself.

''Regards'',<br>[[User:AGK|<font color="#ED9121">'''Anthøny'''</font>]] 11:26, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
:Deleted revisions of [[HD DVD Code]]. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 15:38, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

==[[factory (band)]]==
Hi Cryptic, this is in regards to your deletion of page "factory (band)". Fairly new to wikipedia, and I realise that there was very little info in the article, however it was just a stub, to be filled in by another band member. deletion reason A7 seems to mean "unremarkable", which I'll admit may currently be the case <I>to you</i>, as we have only just finished recording and are therefore <i>relatively</i> unknown. However we were recorded by Jimi maroudis, who has worked as producer/assistant producer for recordings of such bands/acts as "the living end", "pete murray", "delta godrem", "augie march" etc, at sing sing studios, one of THE premiere studios in australia, and while it was a self funded, therefore low budget production, we have a fair bit of interest so far given the cd is yet to be distributed/promotion has not yet began. I am (honestly) curious what you would consider grounds for undeletion, and how I would go about it. please also check out our music at myspace.com/factoryaustralia (even if you dont have any intention of undeleting, you never know, you might just like it).
cheers, Ben -- [[User:Jsguitarman|Jsguitarman]]
:Please see our [[WP:MUSIC|notability guidelines for musical topics]]. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 04:39, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
:Ok thanks for the reply -- [[User:Jsguitarman|Jsguitarman]]

== Deletion of [[Spyware terminator]] ==

Hi there, i am a fresher to wiki writing and i have been trying to do a write up on Spyware Terminator , a product i have been using recently, of course not with an intention to promote it or something, but just let users know about its existence like ad aware, spybot are there. when there were markings about 'advertising' on the page, (which was actually from one of my friends) i had it removed and rewritten. It was marked for deletion when there was no third party citations available, i was working on it and in coordination with another admin but before he didnt even know about it, the article has been deleted. he had mentioned that articles marked AFD are usually left open till the discussion concludes or something like it, i saw a couple other articles (like javapedia i am trying to edit) given a time period before it will be deleted. but none happened with Spyware terminator.

my request would be to revoke the spyware terminator that i will try to rewrite it to meet the standards . that was my idea behind posting a cleanup tag. i was under the impression that it will give an idea to others that i am trying to adapt it to wikimedia requirements.

please advise...thanks <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Rajeshontheweb|Rajeshontheweb]] ([[User talk:Rajeshontheweb|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rajeshontheweb|contribs]]) 10:06, 28 May 2007 (UTC{{{3|}}})</small>

:I'm not sure who you mean by "another admin"; no other administrator had edited the page or otherwise taken any action with respect to it before I speedy-deleted it as advertising. (I do note, though, that after you re-created the article, another administrator concurred and speedied it as spam as well.) If you truly intend to write an encyclopedia article instead of a promotion, as you say, then I suggest that
:# you look at other articles in our encyclopedia and base your writing style on them, as opposed to the back-of-box advertising copy your previous attempts much more closely resembled; and
:# you first find [[WP:RS|independent, reliable sources]], and base your article [[WP:FORGET|solely on them]]. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 04:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

It was dynaflow - i thought he was an admin. But if the article could be retrieved, i am interested in rewriting the article as i did not mean it to be a promotion of the product in the first place and i am not involved with the company other than that i am an active member of their forums and i use the product. i just wanted it to be an introduction about the software just like ad aware or spybot.. thanks for the help..

: i see u have marked it for deletion again, please correct me if there is areas it still shows up bad advert. i am not into advertising the product, i just wanted to write an article, and i am a newbie trying to sort this advertising stuff sorted out. i sincerely am interested in redoing the article to clear the advertising statements. please highlight the lines i have missed out which are outright advert. thanks [[User:Rajeshontheweb|Rajeshontheweb]] 07:50, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
:just noticed the features section was mostly on my own research (which is not permissible) and i have removed it, if u could give us some more time and not let anybody mark it for speedy deletion, would be pleased [[User:Rajeshontheweb|Rajeshontheweb]] 08:53, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

== Snippy removal of all links to Calysto static checker ==

Hi,

I consider that removing all links to Calysto static checker
from 'Static code analysis', 'List of tools for static code
analysis', and 'Formal verification' was snippy, unexplained,
and unnecessary. Calysto is a static checker and as such
belongs under those topics. Could you please let me know why
did you remove them? (Several static checkers are mentioned
in both categories, so the link is obviously appropriate.)

Second, when I reverted your changes, you banned my ip. This is
abuse of administrative permissions.

This is really not the way to maintain Wikipedia. Those
links fit well the context and I had no intention to spam
(which was your explanation).


: i see u have marked it for deletion again, please correct me if there is areas it still shows up bad advert. i am not into advertising the product, i just wanted to write an article, and i am a newbie trying to sort this advertising stuff sorted out. i sincerely am interested in redoing the article to clear the advertising statements. please highlight the lines i have missed out which are outright advert. thanks [[User:Rajeshontheweb|Rajeshontheweb]] 07:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

== Stop! ==

Please stop removing links to {{tl|sww}}; it isn't the same template as {{tl|Wookieepedia box}}. {{tl|sww}} was made into a redirect into the latter template; I've undone that redirect, and am now reverting your removal of the template (at the very least, it isn't covered under the scope of the TfD). [[User:EVula|EVula]] <span style="color: #999;">// [[User talk:EVula|talk]] // [[User:EVula/admin|<span style="color: #366;">&#9775;</span>]] //</span> 18:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
:...ack. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 18:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
::Heh, pretty much sums up my response... even after reverting the edits, I have to go back in and fix the missing bullet. What an entire mess the {{tl|Wookieepedia box}} ordeal has been. [[User:EVula|EVula]] <span style="color: #999;">// [[User talk:EVula|talk]] // [[User:EVula/admin|<span style="color: #366;">&#9775;</span>]] //</span> 18:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

==Wookieepedia box==

I am puzzled by your nomination of this template for deletion, considering that two comparable templates are already on TfD with nothing approaching a consensus to delete. To further speedy that template, and reverse the closure of another administrator in good standing seems rather [[WP:POINT|needlessly pointy]], but I am perhaps misunderstanding your intentions? [[User:Phil Sandifer|Phil Sandifer]] 18:38, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
:I edit-conflicted on the close with David Gerard, whom I'm assuming was not aware of the previous tfd. (Which doesn't look like the one I vaguely recalled, so there may be more than one.) In any case, it was in no way a speedy keep. I find your link to [[WP:POINT]] gratuitously insulting; if anything has been disrupting Wikipedia, it's the mass insertion of these boxes linking to sites that - at least in [[Template:Hpw|some cases]] - don't even meet our criteria for an unadorned external link. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 18:47, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
::Oh you shut up Phil. Yesterday i did some work and went trough the Sister Templates category and moved this box to the External link boxes category. Apparently you picked this up and though it was a good idea to start adding it to some articles, once again showing no respect to your fellow editors by just trolling on and ignoring the fact that this thing IS being contested. At the same time you are complaining about people like Matthew who are revert warring over this, instead of being the better editor and putting your idea up for debate again. Now don't be all whiny about this close of a previously unused template. Hell I got the HarryPotterWiki one delisted for you, it's time to start looking at yourself now. --[[User:TheDJ|TheDJ]] ([[User talk:TheDJ|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TheDJ|contribs]]) 18:50, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
:::That was rather incivil. I have not touched this or any similar template since the edit war with Matthew, preferring to wait for all of the TfDs to close. Any changes I made to this came before the Memory Alpha template was even created - this was, if I recall, the third one of these I made. (After TARDIS and Babylon 5, before Memory Alpha and Harry Potter) [[User:Phil Sandifer|Phil Sandifer]] 19:05, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

:::To make this perfectly clear, this box was not in use yesterday !!! --[[User:TheDJ|TheDJ]] ([[User talk:TheDJ|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TheDJ|contribs]]) 19:04, 31 May 2007 (UTC)


::::Ummm... yeah. Yeah, it was. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jedi&diff=133731568&oldid=133716651]. Followed, the next day, by putting redirecting [[Template:sww]] to this, which I, once again, proposed to the relevant WikiProject and on the template talk page, to no objection. Your attempts to paint me as a vicious or sneaky edit warrior here really aren't based on anything resembling reality. [[User:Phil Sandifer|Phil Sandifer]] 19:05, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
:::::I retract my statement. I confused it with one of the others. --[[User:TheDJ|TheDJ]] ([[User talk:TheDJ|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TheDJ|contribs]]) 19:10, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

== unclear about your recent edit to my userspace page ==

Can you let me know if there's anything wrong with it? [[User:Tony1|Tony]] 02:39, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
:{{tl|Good}}, {{tl|Bad}}, and {{tl|Not correct}} (among others) were recently deleted, as per [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 June 5#AfD voting templates]]. Cryptic was removing the templates. [[User:EVula|EVula]] <span style="color: #999;">// [[User talk:EVula|talk]] // [[User:EVula/admin|<span style="color: #366;">&#9775;</span>]] //</span> 02:44, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

== Speedy deletion on [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 June 5]] ==

I noticed that you speedy deleted the "good" "bad" templates. However, the TfD rationale was inaccurate. Most transclusions of the templates were not used in XfDs, (only the last one was), rather, they were mostly used to mark list items and examples on project pages. So, you deleted templates that were in use for legitimate purposes after being given an inaccurate rationale. The names don't say "delete" or "keep" and neither do the templates. I think you should reconsider this closure. [[User:Night Gyr|Night Gyr]] ([[User talk:Night Gyr|talk]]/[[User:Night Gyr/Over|Oy]]) 22:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
:No response? [[User:Night Gyr|Night Gyr]] ([[User talk:Night Gyr|talk]]/[[User:Night Gyr/Over|Oy]]) 19:39, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
::I apologize; I didn't have time to respond properly when I got the new messages banner, and have had such a screwed-up week since then that your query honesty slipped my mind.

::I stand by the speedies, however; the current whatlinkshere lists are incomplete, as several of the transclusions on voting pages have been removed. [[Template:Bad]], [[Template:Correct]], and [[Template:Not correct]] were all used only on [[WP:MOS]], a draft of [[WP:MOS]] in Tony1's userspace, and on many afd pages; [[Template:Good]] was additionally used on a handful of user pages - about half of which predate the template's prior deletion - and on [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Sweden]]. That the templates did not themselves say keep or delete isn't especially relevant if they're being used that way (and note that I also speedied two more templates created by an editor of all four of these, [[Template:Keep]] and [[Template:Symboldelete]], at the same time). The Manual of Style and Wikiproject Sweden aren't substantially harmed by using the images directly, but there is such a strong consensus against their use as voting, especially through template shortcuts, that I feel my speedies to be completely justified. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 04:28, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

== <nowiki>{{disamb}}</nowiki> ==

Why does this template go at the bottom? It just seems like it makes it unlikely that anyone will look at it.—[[User:Rjakew|Red Baron]] 16:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
:Inertia, mainly. See [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)#The disambig notice]]. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 16:50, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

== Tactics Arena Online ==
I don't get why you deleted the article I worked so hard on. It wasn't nonsense plus it had sources. [[User:Runewiki777|<strong><font color="#6495ED" face="Comic Sans Ms">Ru<font color="#007FFF">n<font color="#1560BD">eW<font color="#0000FF">i<font color= "#00008B">ki</font></font></font></font></font></strong>]]<sup>[[User talk:Runewiki777|777]]</sup> 19:38, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

By the way. G4 is not the correct deletion reason. The article wasn't identical in any way. [[User:Runewiki777|<strong><font color="#6495ED" face="Comic Sans Ms">Ru<font color="#007FFF">n<font color="#1560BD">eW<font color="#0000FF">i<font color= "#00008B">ki</font></font></font></font></font></strong>]]<sup>[[User talk:Runewiki777|777]]</sup> 19:52, 16 June 2007 (UTC) And why did you delete the pics I uploaded?

Please don't ignore me. [[User:Runewiki777|<strong><font color="#6495ED" face="Comic Sans Ms">Ru<font color="#007FFF">n<font color="#1560BD">eW<font color="#0000FF">i<font color= "#00008B">ki</font></font></font></font></font></strong>]]<sup>[[User talk:Runewiki777|777]]</sup> 20:51, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

== Your name ==
Why the red link? <b>[[User:Salaskan|<span style="color:red">Sala</span>]][[User talk:Salaskan|<span style="color:gold">Skan</span>]]</b> 12:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
:It's not red, it's rouge. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 20:26, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

== Counter-Strike Manager ==

Why did you delete it? [[Counter-Strike Manager]]
--[[User:TobykwAn|TobykwAn]] 21:47, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
:It says so right next to my name. &mdash;[[User talk:Cryptic|Cryptic]] 21:52, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Allrighty... Care to explain it?
Was it an ad. I'm confused. I couldn't have made it more objective than I did.
--[[User:TobykwAn|TobykwAn]] 21:54, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
==Orphaned non-free image (Image:Planar Chaos expansion symbol.jpg)==
Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:Planar Chaos expansion symbol.jpg]]'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[WP:FU|claim of fair use]]. However, the image is currently [[Wikipedia:Orphan|orphaned]], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. [[WP:BOLD|You may add it back]] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 08:32, 21 June 2007 (UTC)


== Deletion review of Spyware Terminator ==

An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|Spyware_terminator}}}|deletion review]] of [[:Spyware_terminator]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. [[User:Cableguytk|Cableguytk]] 04:27, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

I am not sure what just happened. Your response was not very clear to me and now i see that you deleted an already blank page...so I have no clue what that was all about. Where was the deletion "review"? [[User:Cableguytk|Cableguytk]] 05:01, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

What does G4 mean? What is wrong with the page and why was it deleted without proper discussion? [[User:Cableguytk|Cableguytk]] 05:42, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

==Asking nicely why List of Dragon Ball Special Abilities was deleted==
Why was list of dragon ball special abilities deleted?Would you please undelete it?If There was something wrong on the page will you fix it? [[User:Earthbendingmaster|Earthbendingmaster]] 22:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

== RSC Article I wrote ==

Just curious if I can view an article that was deleted about a year ago. Here's all I have on it: 21:46, 31 October 2006 Cryptic (Talk | contribs) deleted "RSC Equipment Rental" (G11: blatant advertising) Thanks. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Areesssea|Areesssea]] ([[User talk:Areesssea|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Areesssea|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}</small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
:Cryptic is not very active at the moment - you might get a quicker response at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]]. -- [[user:Rick Block|Rick Block]] <small>([[user talk:Rick Block|talk]])</small> 15:57, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

== Colemak ==

An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#{{{2|Colemak}}}|deletion review]] of [[:Colemak]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. [[User:Qwfpg|Qwfpg]] 21:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

== Last Chance Garage ==

You sure don't want ANYONE to find out about this great WGBH show, and worse, you REFUSED to give me a chance to explain my reason for creating that page...you were so anxious to delete it(TWO minutes after it was created???), and then when I said I was going to try again, I was warned by other editors(and users) about your actions, and not to do so, but instead to talk to you about it...was it just because I mentioned the show's sponsors?...or was it because...well, I don't know...please advise, because I want to restore that page ASAP...[[User:Michaela92399|Michaela92399]] 16:42, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Yeah...no fair!!!...everybody who was a "backyard mechanic" wanted to know how to DIY on their cars properly, and Brad Sears was the person to do it...please heed Michaela's call and restore her page..."Last Chance Garage" was just as famous and well worth watching as "The French Chef" and "The Victory Garden"...or even "ZOOM"!...[[User:Baldwin91006|Baldwin91006]] 17:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:20, 15 September 2007

Why are you deleting my pages, why are eradicating my family, and why don't resepect my work on the pages you deleted? I have no copies. Please send m back the info you deleted.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cryptic/archive-7&oldid=158010655"