User talk:Cute 1 4 u: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:34, 23 October 2006

This user is banned from editing the English Wikipedia. Administrators, please review the banning policy before unblocking.
(block log · contributions)

The owner of this account is suspected of abusively using multiple accounts.

(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets)

ANI Debate: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive138#Possible_sockpuppet_of_Cute_1_4_u

In order to have easy communication with Cute 1 4 u, all confirmed sockpuppets had their Talk pages moved and redirected here in order for Cute 1 4 u to receive all messages intended for her. The sockpuppets may be found at .

The following are archives of sockpuppet pages and should not be altered:

The following is the talk page for Cute 1 4 u. Please send any messages below this line.

Archive 1

Unprotected

This page has been unprotected so as to allow the banned user to leave important comments if necessary. helpme and unblock requests are not appropriate here. The editor is banned, not just blocked, and this discussion page was previously protected due to continued vandalism of this page by the blocked user. However, it is not considered an act of vandalism for the banned user to leave, for example, a rationale to justify an unban (while it is for that user to leave it anywhere else). --Yamla 19:38, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! How are you doing so far??? Hope you're A OK.--Ed^{talk c E} 22:32, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm great. I love reality. School's great and have no stress. I'm so relieved to be away from this site. I visit it every week. Just to check up on what's new about me and my blocks. Well I gotta go, but thanks for everything especially the concern. -- ~ * Cute 1 4 u |talk to me! * ~ 03:01, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cutie 4 life, User:Sweet Pinkette, or User:Cutie fo eva are not my sockpuppets. I'm that interested it Wikipedia that much to have them. I'm was readingmy cases. But do what ya will. Gotta go. -- ~ * Cute 1 4 u |talk to me! * ~ 04:33, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I just noticed someone possibly trying to impersonate me. User:Cutie 1 4 U. It seems that shes wants to be like me. Whatever. - ~ * Cute 1 4 u |talk to me! * ~ 00:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, it looks like you've stopped being WikiDestructive! I'm actually in favor of you getting unblocked, since you've seemed to calm down and you want to make constructive edits to the 'pedia! Cheers! •The RSJ ^{(Central—Say What?!)}• 16:34, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great idea! Maybe I should propose your unblock!!!--Ed^{I'm busy!!! Don't talk to me...} _contribs 16:59, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah me too, I feel sorry for people with non-vandal intentions being banned. But first you have to promise you will do good for Wikipedia when you're unblocked and you will use edit summaries so people could know your edit intentions. Michaelas10 18:10, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing your ban

Would you like us to appeal your ban?--Ed^{I'm lonely, talk to me} _contribs 13:54, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Woohoo! Great idea, Ed! In fact...

I, The RSJ, hereby award you the RSJ Smile Award, an award I issue which signifies that this person is a great Wikipedian, and is willing to help out other people. I may also give this award to Wikipedians if they are feeling blue, getting beat up by the community for making a mistake, or just because I feel like being nice! So, have a great day, and I'll be seein' ya around...

Cheers, and I'll be seein' ya around (hopefully being a great Wikipedian!)... •The RSJ ^{(Central—Say What?!—CCD)}• 02:06, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So, am I unblocked? - Cute 1 4 u

No. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 01:23, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, sorry, not yet... •The RSJ• ^{(Say What?!—CCD)} 00:54, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Details

Ok. I'm going to need EVERY SINGLE COMMENT that Cute 1 4 u posted after her block. And on a side note, who wants to file the request for arbitration?--Ed^{I'm lonely, talk to me} _contribs 01:00, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see if I can. bibliomaniac15 02:45, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if I can bring it over, now that I've examined Cute 1 4 u and the Requests for Arbitration page. My observations about the user:

Many of her edits are constructive, but has instances of being frivolous (e.g. a "guess my name" contest [1], use of talk pages for chat).
She created many sock puppets, many of which abused policy, but she stated that "she didn't care"[2].
On her former friends list, she had three friends that are now blocked indefinitely (User:Bethicalyna, User:S-man, and User:Lindsay1980).
Apparently has reformed.
Instances of personal attacks by her can be found on her talk page archive.

I am writing this from a neutral point of view. I think that before we appeal, we should carefully examine the evidence. If Cute 1 4 u really wants to pursue this, then request. A viable alternative would be for her to create a new user under a completely different name and make no reference to her past. For her to do this, she would have to completely reform and stay away from trouble. This is my side. I encourage everyone to post their thoughts before filing a request. bibliomaniac15 03:17, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I don't wanna be biased, but I just want to give her one more chance... if she vandalizes again, we block her until the end of the world... she might actually be constructive, but of course, she might just use her chance to be WikiDestructive again. We'll see, I guess... •The RSJ• ^{(Say What?!—CCD—Give Me Some Ideas!)} 02:00, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First Step: I agree with giving Cutie (and S-man) a second chance. Their "secret vandalism project" was probably just an In-joke, and I am almost positive both want to contribute constructively to the 'pedia.

Second Step: How are we going to do that?

I don't mean to be so judgemental, but having discussing a secret vandalism project as an in-joke is of bad taste. bibliomaniac15 00:00, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliomaniac's ideas of Cute 1 4 U creating a new account to circumvent the current indef. block is unfeasible. The community banned him/her, if she ever create a new account, it is an act of disregarding wikipedia regulations. Maybe she already has sleeper socks, who knows? If she wants to be unblocked, she should follow the process of appealing (personally I think it is highly unlikely and will probably just be another case like User:PoolGuy).--Bonafide.hustla 00:24, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for suggesting something like that. bibliomaniac15 00:29, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, it's all good. You don't have to be sorry.--Bonafide.hustla 00:32, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For Cute 1 4 u

I just want to know this. Cute 1 4 u, how come you became a wikidesructive monster? When I first became a member of wikipedia you were excellent and prevented vandislism. Why did you turn to the dark side? Answer me.Tennislover 19:24, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've actually been like that. I had a few socks before that that where abusive but then i wanted to not really be indentifed. Some these people got on my nerves. I had to show my true self and get mad so they with back DOWN. They got offended my me I guess so they blocked me. Which they should understand that a preteen/teen has there moods and they shouldn't have blocked me. The 1st or 2nf time they blocked me, it was if because of me being under 13. But I'm not sure id User:S-Man is even going to this site anymre. I'm don't know. I qwant another chance. Peace. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cute 1 4 u (talk • contribs)

Being moody is understandable but is no excuse for your behaviour. If you are unwilling or unable for whatever reason to adhere to Wikipedia policies, you have no place here. Given this edit, I see very little has changed. I feel it would be inappropriate at this time to unban you. Perhaps in another year or so. --Yamla 21:51, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Hi, Cute 1 4 u, but cussing out people like you did to 64.40.61.233 [3] will not work for you. If you hope to have the ban lifted, remember to assume good faith and no personal attacks. Please do not affect what others think of you by doing this. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 21:30, 21 October 2006 (UTC).[reply]

he/she called me a whore. [4] I just had to finish what every i had to say. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cute 1 4 u (talk • contribs)

Hey!!! Calm down...your chances of getting unblocked have already decreased. Even though the IP called you a whore, it is important to keep a cool head.--Ed^{I'm lonely, talk to me} _contribs 21:44, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This issue seems to be never ending. It is such a waste of everybody's precious time. I thought this user, who claimed to be 11 (we have no way of knowing), is blocked by the community. We shouldn't even be having this discussion. She already exhausted the community's patience.--Bonafide.hustla 05:00, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm getting a little uneasy... Cute 1 4 u, you've lost your cool again... if you do get unblocked (and I don't know if that's going to happen now 'cause of this), I hope you keep your cool. There's always gonna be people on the 'pedia who are gonna be offensive, mean, or just plain rude, and every Wikipedian on the site has to deal with that. If you do keep calm, then you can maybe get unblocked... Cheers (and I do agree with Bonafide.hustla, but, hey, this is Wikipedia, what can ya do?) - The RSJ _{300 million and} _{still going strong!} 15:05, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know why I called a random user a whore, probably because I dont like disney channel fanatics, but it sure is funny that my 10 seconds of work caused drama for a few people. Trolled. Lol. 64.40.63.234 21:38, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not hooked on disney channel that much and i'm not the bitch to be played with. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cute 1 4 u (talk • contribs)

She/he shouldn't have said anything to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cute 1 4 u (talk • contribs)

An idea

Now, this might sound like a crazy idea but I think Cutie deserves another chance. However, I believe she needs to pass our standards of the community. I believe we need to have an interview with Cute 1 4 u with a few questions. These questions can determine whether or not she can be unblocked. Then, we can submit the evidence to an administrator. How's that for an idea.Pretty random idea, actually.Tennislover 02:34, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 112: / Line 112: @@
 She/he shouldn't have said anything to me. {{unsigned|Cute 1 4 u}}
+== An idea ==
+Now, this might sound like a crazy idea but I think Cutie deserves another chance. However, I believe she needs to pass our standards of the community. I believe we need to have an interview with Cute 1 4 u with a few questions. These questions can determine whether or not she can be unblocked. Then, we can submit the evidence to an administrator. How's that for an idea.Pretty random idea, actually.[[User:Tennislover|Tennislover]] 02:34, 23 October 2006 (UTC)