User talk:Deepfriedokra/g11: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Adjusting for biographies: gonna need a little time |
some thoughts |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I use this as a template message to educate those whose pages I delete per [[WP:G11]]. But it's geared more toward biographies. What catchphrases and content help you recognise a G11 biography? --<b>[[User:Deepfriedokra|<span style="color:black">Deep</span><span style="color:red">fried</span><span style="color:DarkOrange">okra</span>]] [[User talk:Deepfriedokra|(<span style="color:black">talk</span>)]]</b> 18:08, 28 September 2020 (UTC) |
I use this as a template message to educate those whose pages I delete per [[WP:G11]]. But it's geared more toward biographies. What catchphrases and content help you recognise a G11 biography? --<b>[[User:Deepfriedokra|<span style="color:black">Deep</span><span style="color:red">fried</span><span style="color:DarkOrange">okra</span>]] [[User talk:Deepfriedokra|(<span style="color:black">talk</span>)]]</b> 18:08, 28 September 2020 (UTC) |
||
:I'm trying to track down a mystery colonel so I've not much free time, but let me put some thought into this and i'll come back to it a little later on. [[User:TomStar81|TomStar81]] ([[User talk:TomStar81|Talk]]) 18:25, 28 September 2020 (UTC) |
:I'm trying to track down a mystery colonel so I've not much free time, but let me put some thought into this and i'll come back to it a little later on. [[User:TomStar81|TomStar81]] ([[User talk:TomStar81|Talk]]) 18:25, 28 September 2020 (UTC) |
||
::This looks pretty good just as it is, although I am sure it could be improved further. I look for such things as statements of opinion or adjectives of quality not part of cited quotations, excessive history; mission statements for organizations; lists of partners rather than description of activities; blurbs and testimonials; excess reliance on self-published sources; excessive detail on parts of the subjects bio or history not relevant to the reasons for notability; resume/CV structure; excessive lists of minor publications; and name-dropping, particularly with mentions of celebrities. Probably other things, those spring to mind off-hand. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|<sub>DESiegel Contribs</sub>]] 19:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:15, 28 September 2020
`
Adjusting for biographies
I use this as a template message to educate those whose pages I delete per WP:G11. But it's geared more toward biographies. What catchphrases and content help you recognise a G11 biography? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:08, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- I'm trying to track down a mystery colonel so I've not much free time, but let me put some thought into this and i'll come back to it a little later on. TomStar81 (Talk) 18:25, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- This looks pretty good just as it is, although I am sure it could be improved further. I look for such things as statements of opinion or adjectives of quality not part of cited quotations, excessive history; mission statements for organizations; lists of partners rather than description of activities; blurbs and testimonials; excess reliance on self-published sources; excessive detail on parts of the subjects bio or history not relevant to the reasons for notability; resume/CV structure; excessive lists of minor publications; and name-dropping, particularly with mentions of celebrities. Probably other things, those spring to mind off-hand. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 19:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC)