User talk:Dereks1x

Welcome Hello, Dereks1x, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Geniac 18:37, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seconding this welcome, and thanking you for your recent contributions. You may also like to check template:welcomeg for more advanced editing tips. --HailFire 13:59, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My own sockpuppeteer case

Thank you for your comments. I find it crazy that a discussion in the real world which then gets translated on to Wikipedia is some how seen as wrong. Friends point out pages to and I do the same for them and yet to share an opinion and show this on Wikipedia is seen as cheating. Once again thank you for your comments. Politicalwatchmen 00:30, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

48 hour block

You no longer need to worry whether Jerseyko's vote at Akhilleus' (thus far unanimous) RFA could have any influence on an evaluation of the WP:SSP request. The case is no longer outstanding: I am closing it with a conclusion that you may read during your 48 hour block for Wikistalking and WP:POINT.[1][2][3][4] Durova^Charge! 01:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: I have reverted your latest question on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Akhilleus. Pascal.Tesson 02:56, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye folks! I am rushing to write this before the 48 hour ban takes place any second. Here's an example [5] where I was banned for asking a legitimate ethics question to a candidate for administratorship. The person who nominated this person did not like the very proper ethics question and banned me. Those two and Jersyko are friends. This appears like a group within wikipedia are in cahoots against those who favor high ethical standards. I wish this wasn't true.Dereks1x 03:10, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is no cabal. Nite. · j e r s y k o talk · 03:23, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Friends? Hardly. It was your own excessive zeal that piqued my interest. As a Wikipedia sysop I specialize in complex investigations. This one checked out. Neither Akhilleus nor Jerseyko petitioned my attention to this SSP until Jerseyko noted at my talk page that the 48 hour block I had already declared hadn't taken effect (a system glitch gave you a brief reprieve). I still haven't had any contact about this matter with Akhilleus, who probably isn't aware of it. I judged this case entirely on its merits. Durova^Charge! 03:53, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mr./Ms. Dereks1x, I found out just now that I have been called a sockpuppet. I may be too late to defend myself because Mr./Ms. Durova has already decided. I is very sorry for that you are banned for 2 days. I understand if you are unable to reply. Sincerely, H. (aka HumanThing)HumanThing 05:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I assume that you can't talk. Just listen. I was curious to see what is a Durova. Fruit? City name? Person's name? So I clicked. Oh my! I am being stalked! This other person already linked my conversation (on top) and communicated it to Durova....with the efficiency of the KGB and CIA. They are listening because they caught it in just minutes[6] and [7] OMG! I am running. They are strong. They have a license to spy and threaten, just like 007. Either that or they are just ruthless and have nothing better to do. Me? I have better things to do. À la prochaine...oh, I am not muppet or pinnochio!HumanThing 06:25, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

/archive 1

Hi

It seems that you are muzzled because you usually aren't so quiet this long. I've done a little housekeeping for you because I know how to do that stuff and you are still a little green (such as the way you create boxes in that other post). I made a comment about Katrina Ko. In retrospect, I should have waited because you're probably going to vote "Keep" and given the trouble that those troublemakers are causing, they may say that it's multiple voting. If you really want to vote and want me to delete my own vote, just let me know. In short, the troublemakers are causing wikipedia to be a dictatorship because we're so cautious about expressing our opinion and will even share a vote rather than having 2 people vote for themselves. Enjoy your weekend. TL500 22:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Don't worry too much about it. But here's a thought. Those people who act like that think that they are normal but actually have a psychiatric problem. People who deny due process or have a show trial, aka kangaroo court, feel good about themselves but are really just small fries with a hidden insecurity problem. Even Nixon was like that. He thought "I am a big man" but had to resort to a 3rd rate burglary.

Reminds me of the movie Scarface with Al Pacino where he says "you think you're a Beeeeeeg Maaaaan, don't you?"

You can erase this after reading it, no need to save for the archives that I made for you.TL500 22:12, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi folks,

Based on a tip from an informant double agent ( - - - -, thanks), I learned that can edit my own talk page but not other pages. However, you, my alleged sockpuppets, can continue to post thus proving that you are not my sockpuppet and show that freedom of speech is difficult to contain (look at the fall of the USSR and Poland). I don't know how my of you suspected sockpuppets read this, but I know TL500 does. HumanThing and DelloJello....and you, too ProhibitOnions..continue to post but do so responsibly otherwise I will be blamed. The campaign will go on. The campaign will go on strongly! This block is not curable, but it is completely treatable. Go campaign and write good articles for wikipedia. Viva onion rings!Dereks1x 23:54, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The SSP concluded with an impartial administrator asserting that all of the accused puppets are, in fact, your sock puppets. Talking to yourself like this is, well, just silly. · j e r s y k o talk · 00:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tvoz

Will you ask Jersyko and Durova to come here. Can you find it in your heart to do that?

Please don't read any further than this point. The following is intended to be private as much as possible. Dereks1x 01:59, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jersyko

Tampering with others' user page is in violation of the rules. You are an administrator and know better. I have given TL500 authorization to do so but nobody else.

Jersyko: TL500 called me and wants to be an adoptee. She is not by a computer. Would you be so kind as to add it ( I mean 2 paraentheses like { and { then the words "adoptme" )to her talk page. Since you think I am her, there's your consent...ok?

Also Jersyko, please ask Durova to come and take a look.Dereks1x 01:47, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Durova

Step back from your anger for a moment. I would like to take your suggestion about the adopt me program. If you care to look at my history, you will note that I have never vandalized. I've never done multiple voting. In fact, I rarely vote. If you go back 2-3 days ago, I never voted at all. I've never advanced wild theories, either. What ticked off Jersyko was some edits in the Barack Obama and John Edwards pages. TL500 did not participate in those pages except may have made a comment once in one of the talk pages.

Can you unblock me and I promise that I will not post in articles or talk pages for that original full 48 hour period. That's called scout's honor. When I begin editing some time in the future, I promise that I will discuss it first with my assigned mentor.

I can't find the page about mentors but TL500 called me and told me what was happening. She says that she wants to do that too but does not have a computer handy. Would you add the adoptme to her user page? As far as the other accused, HumanThing and DelloJello, I haven't a clue who they are so I don't care about them.

This user seeks adoption by an experienced editor.
(Users offering adoption)

Prefer mentor that does not have frequent contact with Jersyko or Durova but this is not a requirement.Dereks1x 01:47, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible suggestions: can you unblock me and I promise it will ONLY contact possible adopters for that purpose and I won't edit for that full 48 hours and after that, only after consultation with a mentor?

Deryck Chan, Neil, or Gnangarra may be possibilites if they are willing.Dereks1x 01:57, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for requesting adoption. There's nothing improper about my actions here and your speculations have been in consistent breach of WP:AGF. Vandalism and voting are red herrings: you were blocked for WP:POINT and Wikistalking and I've very nearly extended your block for WP:SOCK.[8][9] Jerseyko's vote one way or the other makes absolutely no difference to the outcome of WP:RFA#Akhilleus, which has received unanimous support. I was not the only editor to deem your posts inappropriate at that page.[10][11] I've been rather lenient here, especially since I didn't extend your block beyond the original 48 hours in spite of the WP:POINT spree you went on during the interim between the time when I announced the block and when it actually got implemented. If you'd like to settle down and help write an encyclopedia I'll be glad to have you back, but it's time to drop the charade. You happen to be dealing with the administrator for whom the Sherlock Holmes Deductive Reasoning Award was created. You have already gotten exactly as much slack from me as you're going to get. The mentors normally come to you. Good luck with WP:ADOPT and give thanks you aren't blocked for a week. Durova^Charge! 02:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the mentoring tip.Dereks1x 03:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]