User talk:Doc James: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: MassMessage delivery
Line 26: Line 26:


Due to the infrequency of edits under the current semi-protection, I think there should be a trial run of pending changes. My last edit on the page was 9 days ago and nobody has edited since then, with the average time between edits being a few weeks. If pending changes doesn’t work, raise it back up again. [[User:CharlieEdited|CharlieEdited]] ([[User talk:CharlieEdited|talk]]) 22:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Due to the infrequency of edits under the current semi-protection, I think there should be a trial run of pending changes. My last edit on the page was 9 days ago and nobody has edited since then, with the average time between edits being a few weeks. If pending changes doesn’t work, raise it back up again. [[User:CharlieEdited|CharlieEdited]] ([[User talk:CharlieEdited|talk]]) 22:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

:Unprotected... [[User:Doc James|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Doc James|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Doc James|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Doc James|email]]) 03:50, 30 March 2024 (UTC)


== ''The Signpost'': 29 March 2024 ==
== ''The Signpost'': 29 March 2024 ==

Revision as of 03:50, 30 March 2024

Note: Mostly over at MDWiki.org.

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to COVID-19, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TarnishedPathtalk 10:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Preventative chemotherapy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 25 § Preventative chemotherapy until a consensus is reached. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 21:57, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lower protection on Intellectual disability

Due to the infrequency of edits under the current semi-protection, I think there should be a trial run of pending changes. My last edit on the page was 9 days ago and nobody has edited since then, with the average time between edits being a few weeks. If pending changes doesn’t work, raise it back up again. CharlieEdited (talk) 22:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected... Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:50, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 March 2024