User talk:Epbr123

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Epbr123 (talk | contribs) at 07:51, 28 May 2013 (archive). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Alde

Hey. Way back in 2007 you created an article for a place in Suffolk (in the UK) called Alde. I'm sure you remember it well :-) I've just stumbled across it and am now awfully confused because, to be honest, I don't think the place exists. There's Aldeburgh and the River Alde but, as far as I know, no Alde village around here. The two sets of coords also don't match up! The coords lead to somewhere with no Alde and the OS grid ref goes somewhere else, again with no place called Alde.

I don't suppose you happen to have any clue about where the place is supposed to be do you? Or whether it might have been created way back when in error? Or after the river or something? Fwiw nothing other than some admin articles really links to it either - my suggestion would be to AfD or Speedy it - although I'm not entirely sure without checking whether it would be eligible for speedying. Thanks. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:49, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I think the source I used was unreliable and actually referred to the River Alde. I've replaced the article with a disambiguation page. Epbr123 (talk) 22:46, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ta - it could have been Alde Community Council actually - seems to be a meeting of 3 parish councils in the Sweffling area which fits with one of the locations. I'll see if I can find out if it's still actually occurring - the minutes are for one of the parishes - and might add it to the dab. Guess it goes down as one of those things! Blue Square Thing (talk) 23:10, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nikki Rhodes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikki Rhodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Rhodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Morbidthoughts (talk) 06:19, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Freedom of choice for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Freedom of choice is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freedom of choice until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

SPECIFICO talk 19:13, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Coldplay - Don't Panic.ogg)

Thanks for uploading File:Coldplay - Don't Panic.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Friend.. I ve never edited wikipedia though i know that its an open source and i began to fear that What if someone mischievous tried to edit/fake the information, so just i tried doing so, and while i tried to replace the mistake i got an message from you stating that the change i ve made is not worthy. That moment i really rejoiced and felt happy that there are people to moderate wiki. Long live you nandha0150 15:54, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Epbr123&oldid=557137365"