User talk:Faizan

User	Talk	E-mail	My part	Toolbox	Bookmarks	Guestbook

→ If you were going to ask "Why did you revert my edit" or "Why did you place a speedy deletion tag on my page" - Read this page first. ←

Wikimedia Highlights from August 2015

Here are the highlights from the Wikimedia blog in August 2015.

• Hundreds of “black hat” English Wikipedia accounts blocked following investigation
• The Hunt for Tirpitz
• My life as an autistic Wikipedian
• Content Translation updates from Wikimania 2015
• Using Wikipedia to preserve indigenous languages of Colombia
• When cultural heritage gets a digital life

About · Subscribe/unsubscribe, 21:17, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Infobox Location is only for Current Ground situation

If you want to give disputed location for Siachen then this rule applies to both Azad Kashmir, Gilgit Baltistan and same as Aksai Chin , Trans-Karakoram Tract, as these all are disputed. Infobox Location is only for Current Ground situation which is reflecting correctly as entire Siachen Glacier is under India's control. for dispute, there is separate page Siachen conflict same as Kashmir conflict.--Koodfaand (talk) 19:07, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Please stop making changes contrary to the RfC. At Talk:Siachen Glacier, we had an RfC that was closed with this result. There is no rule rather it's the RfC's result only for Siachen Glacier. For other articles, we will need separate RfCs. Faizan (talk) 19:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Even in thar RFc , there is no clear consensus and users like Call me maybe!! have raised serious concern. So dont be in any illusion. The Rfc is closed by a non-admin --Koodfaand (talk) 19:18, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Did you even see the result? It does not matter that the closure is by an admin or not. Anyhow, @Graeme Bartlett: is an administrator. Graeme, please have a look? Am I not getting the things straight? Faizan (talk) 19:25, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I closed the RFC, and it did have a clear result. Also note that Siachen Glacier has discretionary sanctions. This means that only one revert is permitted, and any editing to keep what you want results in a block. Consider that you have been warned about this situation. This editing restriction also applies to User:Koodfaand and me. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:18, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

@Graeme Bartlett: Thanks for your input. However, in my knowledge, discretionary sanctions do not automatically that a revert restriction is in place. Can you please double check? (I don't mind 1RR. I normally practise it anyway. But many people would be shocked if this were the case, because all India-Pakistan-Afghanistan pages are under discretionary sanctions.) - Kautilya3 (talk) 23:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

• Editorial: No access is no answer to closed access

• News and notes: Byrd and notifications leave, but page views stay; was a terror suspect editing Wikipedia?

• In the media: Is there life on Mars?

• Featured content: Why did the emu cross the road?

• Traffic report: Another week

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:43, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

2014 Pakistan Super League listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2014 Pakistan Super League. Since you had some involvement with the 2014 Pakistan Super League redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

2014–15 Pakistan Super League listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2014–15 Pakistan Super League. Since you had some involvement with the 2014–15 Pakistan Super League redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:21, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying me about the discussion. I have commented there. Faizan (talk) 10:50, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Eid al-Adha

Long Live Goat Meat

Salam, I wish you a very happy Eid celebrations to you. I like this festival of sacrifice because goat is also one of animal who get sacrificed. I really like Goat meat very much. Anyway, Eid Mubarak again. --Human3015^TALK  10:25, 25 September 2015 (UTC)