User talk:GizzyCatBella: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:GizzyCatBella/Archives/2022/June. (BOT) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
::::For example, isn't that section the same of this one[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetiana_Starodub#List_of_major_works]? [[User:Mhorg|Mhorg]] ([[User talk:Mhorg|talk]]) 20:20, 20 June 2022 (UTC) |
::::For example, isn't that section the same of this one[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetiana_Starodub#List_of_major_works]? [[User:Mhorg|Mhorg]] ([[User talk:Mhorg|talk]]) 20:20, 20 June 2022 (UTC) |
||
:::::Yes, I know, you could restore it but I think we should wait for the result of the AfD. - <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:GizzyCatBella|<span style="color:#40">'''GizzyCatBella'''</span>]][[User talk:GizzyCatBella|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:0 0 0 red;font-size:80%">🍁</span>]]</span></small> 23:11, 20 June 2022 (UTC) |
:::::Yes, I know, you could restore it but I think we should wait for the result of the AfD. - <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:GizzyCatBella|<span style="color:#40">'''GizzyCatBella'''</span>]][[User talk:GizzyCatBella|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:0 0 0 red;font-size:80%">🍁</span>]]</span></small> 23:11, 20 June 2022 (UTC) |
||
== Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion == |
|||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement]] regarding a possible violation of an [[WP:AC|Arbitration Committee]] decision. <!--Template:AE-notice--> Thank you. [[User:Szmenderowiecki|Szmenderowiecki]] ([[User talk:Szmenderowiecki|talk]]) 15:58, 24 June 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:58, 24 June 2022
| Page views for this talk page over the last 90 days | ||
|---|---|---|
Detailed traffic statistics |
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Removal of pubblications
Hi GizzyCatBella, I saw that you also consider Katchanovski valid to be in the encyclopaedia. Do you think this removal is justified?[1] I have seen in the articles of other academics that the most important publications can be put that way. Am I wrong?--Mhorg (talk) 17:47, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- I think it’s okay to remove it, the article is too short. - GizzyCatBella🍁 18:29, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Are you talking about the whole article or the "publications" section? If you are talking about the section, how could those publications be cited correctly? Mhorg (talk) 19:33, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- I’ll look at it later, but first his notability needs to be established. I personally believe he in notable but other editors think he is not. Everything else can be fixed later. - GizzyCatBella🍁 20:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- For example, isn't that section the same of this one[2]? Mhorg (talk) 20:20, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, I know, you could restore it but I think we should wait for the result of the AfD. - GizzyCatBella🍁 23:11, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- For example, isn't that section the same of this one[2]? Mhorg (talk) 20:20, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- I’ll look at it later, but first his notability needs to be established. I personally believe he in notable but other editors think he is not. Everything else can be fixed later. - GizzyCatBella🍁 20:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Are you talking about the whole article or the "publications" section? If you are talking about the section, how could those publications be cited correctly? Mhorg (talk) 19:33, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. Thank you. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 15:58, 24 June 2022 (UTC)