User talk:Jean787

August 2022

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of military occupations, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 08:27, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jean787! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of List of military occupations several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:List of military occupations, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 14:48, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 08:27, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Military Occupation

I actually just removed the example of Kashmir from that article. It was actually added just a few days ago and I assume it would have eventually been removed. I removed however because it really needs to be discussed more in depth. Just as quick review I can easily find multiple sources that refer to Pakistan Occupied Kashmir. I haven't found anything otherwise. I haven't found anything that suggests any international view that supports either position.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 16:57, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]