User talk:Kaj Taj Mahal: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Darkness Shines (talk | contribs)
→‎Notification: new section
Darkness Shines (talk | contribs)
Line 64: Line 64:


[[WP:ARBCC]] For constantly added unsourced contentious content to a BLP. [[User:Darkness Shines|Darkness Shines]] ([[User talk:Darkness Shines|talk]]) 11:20, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
[[WP:ARBCC]] For constantly added unsourced contentious content to a BLP. [[User:Darkness Shines|Darkness Shines]] ([[User talk:Darkness Shines|talk]]) 11:20, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

I have filed an AE against ya, respond [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Kaj_Taj_Mahal here] [[User:Darkness Shines|Darkness Shines]] ([[User talk:Darkness Shines|talk]]) 01:51, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:51, 11 January 2014

Welcome!

Hello, Kaj Taj Mahal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Lexein (talk) 02:03, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Xchat

Your edit summary at this edit, "no one cares" was pretty rude to whoever you were addressing, and uninformative to other editors. I should know, I'm guilty of doing the same thing too often. Please read WP:Edit summaries and WP:Civility. Summaries are best when they communicate reasoned action. Consider "rm, unsourced", or even, "unsourced & trivial: minor OS". It's best to keep argument and opinion out of noncontroversial deletions. That is, don't provoke. If you've read this far, thanks, and welcome to Wikipedia. --Lexein (talk) 02:03, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:BLP

Hi, I rolled back your addition at the talk page for List of Scientists Opposing, etc, due to inflammatory language denigrating people. I don't particularly care for those guys' writings myself, but still we have to follow WP:BLP. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 20:17, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto. Your talk page comments, along with your !vote at the AfD, seemed a little like trolling. It would be helpful to keep the sarcasm to a minimum.- MrX 21:12, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

WP:ARBCC For constantly added unsourced contentious content to a BLP. Darkness Shines (talk) 11:20, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have filed an AE against ya, respond here Darkness Shines (talk) 01:51, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]