User talk:KoA: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Notice: new section
Line 31: Line 31:


Thanks! [[Special:Contributions/86.170.22.40|86.170.22.40]] ([[User talk:86.170.22.40|talk]]) 04:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! [[Special:Contributions/86.170.22.40|86.170.22.40]] ([[User talk:86.170.22.40|talk]]) 04:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

== Notice ==

You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Clarification_request:_Genetically_modified_organisms]] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration guide]] may be of use.

Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbitration CA notice --> --[[User:David Tornheim|David Tornheim]] ([[User talk:David Tornheim|talk]]) 23:44, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:44, 13 September 2018

I'm sometimes online sporadically, although typically at least once a day unless it's around the weekend. I'll usually respond pretty quickly to any questions, but real life takes priority, so I may not always be the quickest to respond. Thanks for your patience if I'm offline for a bit.

(In case you haven't yet, look below its table of contents).

This outline follows the standards for outlines, which together, form one of Wikipedia's contents navigation subsystems. For comparison with other outlines, please see the overall set of outlines at Portal:Contents/Outlines. Thank you.    — The Transhumanist   01:27, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks The Transhumanist. I must admit that's news to me, otherwise I wouldn't have prodded it. I did some beforehand searching as to whether outlines were really a legitimate thing (assuming categories were supposed to take care of that need), so that information seems to be buried in the search process a bit unfortunately. Kingofaces43 (talk) 21:20, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look

I know that you are already following the page more carefully than I am, but could you please take a look at the bottom of Talk:Glyphosate-based herbicides. There is an editor there who looks to me to be heading rapidly to AE, but I have banned myself from their talk page, so I cannot give them the needed DS alert. If you think it is appropriate, I hope that you might consider giving the alert. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:20, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have given the relevant DS alert to the editor being discussed.Dialectric (talk) 23:21, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I actually had intended on checking this out when I got in before I even saw your message. Looks like folks are way ahead of me. I personally try to ignore them at this point when they're starting things up again since most of the problematic editors have been banned, but I agree they're on a pretty tight rope in terms of getting themselves at AE. Most stuff in the topic now can/should be handled without needing AE at this point I think, but that's one case where I can't be so sure of that. Kingofaces43 (talk) 02:25, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks everybody. --Tryptofish (talk) 17:34, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the "administrative ruling in effect"

Hello, you will see that only one person had reverted edits more than once on the same page.

Thanks! 86.170.22.40 (talk) 04:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Clarification_request:_Genetically_modified_organisms and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.

Thanks, --David Tornheim (talk) 23:44, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]