User talk:MarshalN20: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 41: Line 41:


[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AWar_of_the_Pacific&diff=578105674&oldid=578103376] You are in danger of violating your topic ban, (<i>MarshalN20 is banned indefinitely from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the history of Latin America, broadly construed across all namespaces.</i>), whilst I sympathise that it was unwarranted and unjust, you are simply giving ammunition to you critics. I would suggest you redact your comments before others take advantage of them. Regards, [[User:Wee Curry Monster|Wee Curry Monster]] <small>[[User talk:Wee Curry Monster|talk]]</small> 13:40, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AWar_of_the_Pacific&diff=578105674&oldid=578103376] You are in danger of violating your topic ban, (<i>MarshalN20 is banned indefinitely from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the history of Latin America, broadly construed across all namespaces.</i>), whilst I sympathise that it was unwarranted and unjust, you are simply giving ammunition to you critics. I would suggest you redact your comments before others take advantage of them. Regards, [[User:Wee Curry Monster|Wee Curry Monster]] <small>[[User talk:Wee Curry Monster|talk]]</small> 13:40, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

:Thanks Wee. Aside from providing a quick suggestion to Keysanger's query, I made sure to only mention that Keysanger's edit (source removal) reflects a conflict of interest and likely vandalism. I believe this to be a valid exemption to the [[WP:TBAN]], per the "obvious vandalism" clause. That said, I do not plan to discuss or write anything else in that regard. Regards.--[[User:MarshalN20|<span style="color:olive">'''MarshalN20'''</span>]] | [[User_talk:MarshalN20|<sup><font color="maroon">'''T'''</font><font color="Silver">'''al'''</font><font color="maroon">'''k'''</font></sup>]] 14:36, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:36, 21 October 2013

Please leave a message. I'll reply here or in your talk page.

Note: A bot archives contents of this page. No recent posts means no messages will be displayed below. Older messages are still readable in the archives (above). New messages may be added here. If you post a message here, I will reply on your talk page.

GOCE September 2013 drive wrap-up

Guild of Copy Editors September 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter

The September 2013 drive wrap-up is now ready for review.
Sign up for the October blitz!

– Your project coordinators: Torchiest and Torchiest, Baffle gab1978 and Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95 and Jonesey95, and The Utahraptor and The Utahraptor.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 04:07, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keysanger is back

Marshall, hello, please take notice than Keysanger has started -again- with his "clean up" editions in the War of the Pacific article. I just reverted its last edit, but I think this is just beginning over again. Greetings. --Ian (CloudAOC) | Talk 01:02, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ian. Yes, it seems Keysanger is back in that mood. Sadly, I am currently unable to participate in the matter. For what it's worth, the article as a whole is in bad shape. Keysanger's edit is like throwing an empty soda can into a public dump.--MarshalN20 | Talk 01:07, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly Reminder

[1] You are in danger of violating your topic ban, (MarshalN20 is banned indefinitely from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the history of Latin America, broadly construed across all namespaces.), whilst I sympathise that it was unwarranted and unjust, you are simply giving ammunition to you critics. I would suggest you redact your comments before others take advantage of them. Regards, Wee Curry Monster talk 13:40, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Wee. Aside from providing a quick suggestion to Keysanger's query, I made sure to only mention that Keysanger's edit (source removal) reflects a conflict of interest and likely vandalism. I believe this to be a valid exemption to the WP:TBAN, per the "obvious vandalism" clause. That said, I do not plan to discuss or write anything else in that regard. Regards.--MarshalN20 | Talk 14:36, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]