User talk:Nug

"Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of his tribe." _{Ayn Rand}

Warning

When I reminded you and Vecrumba of the topic ban here [1], I deliberately chose the mildest and less drama-prone way of doing so, by simply collapsing out the comments rather than formally warning or blocking you. That doesn't mean it wasn't intended as a administrative action made in enforcement of the Arbcom restrictions. You are not welcome to simply revert me and declare yourself unrestricted on your own authority, as you did here, and then continue the same behaviour [2].

If you need a more formal type of warning, here it is: your topic ban from Eastern European articles, widely construed, including "process discussions" about the same, does also pertain to process discussions about individual editors, if the discussion is focussed on their editing in the disputed topic area. This is a common-sense interpretation of the Arbcom ruling, especially where the editors in question were centrally involved in the complex of disputes that caused the whole disruptive situation of which the EEML issue was part.

You may disagree with this interpretation of the rule, but unless I see a clarification to the contrary from Arbcom itself, or at least significant dissent from fellow administrators, I will enforce it. I am still refraining from blocking you for now, but would appreciate a confirmation that you will stick with the restriction in this sense. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:07, 20 February 2010 (UTC)