User talk:MehrdadFR/Archive 2: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AE complaint.
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/51&oldid=750796288 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/51&oldid=750796288 -->
== 1RR vio==
This [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=AMIA_bombing&diff=800955152&oldid=800949368] is violation of 1rr per [[WP:ARBPIA]]. I urge you to self revert.[[User:Icewhiz|Icewhiz]] ([[User talk:Icewhiz|talk]]) 19:45, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

== Ds/alert ARBPIA ==
{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''

'''Please carefully read this information:'''

The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding the [[Arab–Israeli conflict]], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles|here]].

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Icewhiz|Icewhiz]] ([[User talk:Icewhiz|talk]]) 10:12, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

== Civility remainder ==
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|attack]] other editors, as you did at [[:Talk:AMIA bombing]]. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please [[Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot|stay cool]] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npa2 -->[[User:Icewhiz|Icewhiz]] ([[User talk:Icewhiz|talk]]) 11:28, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

== AE ==
Please note you've been reported at: [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement]].[[User:Icewhiz|Icewhiz]] ([[User talk:Icewhiz|talk]]) 19:43, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:51, 18 September 2017

3RR warning

MehrdadFR, if you aren't aware of it, you need to read the WP:3RR page about reverting too often. In short, you cannot make a revert (which is any type of edit that undoes another editors changes in whole or in part more then 3 times in a 24 period. Right now you've gone past that limit on the Hijab by country and could be blocked for edit-warring. You've made a change (removing some information) and it's been reverted by other editors. At this point, you need to use the article talk page (on the Hijab by country article) and discuss it. Continually reverting as you're doing will only end up with you being blocked. Please read the page on the 3RR rule that I linked to above, and also the page on dispute resolution on some options for resolving things. Please consider this a warning for edit-warring on that article. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 17:31, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. —Granger (talk · contribs) 02:01, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MehrdadFR. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]