User talk:MehrdadFR/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by AnarchistFakest - ""
You have been blocked from editing for violation of the three-revert rule on Irreligion in Iran. (TW)
Line 7: Line 7:


:::Are you working for the Islamic Republic by any chance due to your persistent anti-irreligious edits? <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:AnarchistFakest|AnarchistFakest]] ([[User talk:AnarchistFakest|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/AnarchistFakest|contribs]]) 04:37, 11 March 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:::Are you working for the Islamic Republic by any chance due to your persistent anti-irreligious edits? <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:AnarchistFakest|AnarchistFakest]] ([[User talk:AnarchistFakest|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/AnarchistFakest|contribs]]) 04:37, 11 March 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== March 2015 ==
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]] and violating the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], as you did at [[:Irreligion in Iran]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]]. &nbsp;[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 04:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-3block -->

Revision as of 04:51, 11 March 2015

Irreligion in Iran

There are errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar with the reverted edits. Sources have been removed as well.--AnarchistFakest (talk) 03:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop edit warring. The verified sources are continuously being removed.--AnarchistFakest (talk) 04:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you seem to understand what I'm trying to tell you. I have reliable sources that you keep removing. In doing so, you add your own sources that are irrelevant to the article and then cite them with grammatical and spelling errors. Now who's the one pushing their agenda?--AnarchistFakest (talk) 04:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Are you working for the Islamic Republic by any chance due to your persistent anti-irreligious edits? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnarchistFakest (talkcontribs) 04:37, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Irreligion in Iran. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Bbb23 (talk) 04:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]