User talk:Nocturnalnow: Difference between revisions
→Huma Abedin: new section |
Professor JR (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> |
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> |
||
[[User:Gamaliel|<span style="color:DarkGreen;">Gamaliel</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Gamaliel|<span style="color:DarkGreen;">talk</span>]])</small> 03:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC) |
[[User:Gamaliel|<span style="color:DarkGreen;">Gamaliel</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Gamaliel|<span style="color:DarkGreen;">talk</span>]])</small> 03:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC) |
||
===Regarding your inclination to no longer contribute to the Abedin article=== |
|||
Sorry to hear of your apparent decision in this matter, friend. Truth is, the rest of us mortals trying to edit and improve Wikipedia are greatly outnumbered by the Hillaryland trolls constantly [[Wikipedia:Stalking|stalking]] any articles related to HRC, using tactics that tend towards group [[Wikipedia:sockpuppetry|sockpuppetry]], uncontrolled use of [[Wikipedia:warnings|warnings]], and other methods that often verge upon [[Wikipedia:bullying]]. I've pretty much given up, too, on trying to neutralize the POV in any Hillary-related articles, as I have much less free time on my hands than they do apparently, and given the shortness of human life. Regards, --- [[User:Professor JR|Professor JR]] ([[User talk:Professor JR|talk]]) 16:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:18, 19 October 2015
I am a new incarnation of Mr. Grant Evans having several times forgotten my password
[[1]]
Huma Abedin
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Gamaliel (talk) 03:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Regarding your inclination to no longer contribute to the Abedin article
Sorry to hear of your apparent decision in this matter, friend. Truth is, the rest of us mortals trying to edit and improve Wikipedia are greatly outnumbered by the Hillaryland trolls constantly stalking any articles related to HRC, using tactics that tend towards group sockpuppetry, uncontrolled use of warnings, and other methods that often verge upon Wikipedia:bullying. I've pretty much given up, too, on trying to neutralize the POV in any Hillary-related articles, as I have much less free time on my hands than they do apparently, and given the shortness of human life. Regards, --- Professor JR (talk) 16:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)