User talk:Sam Vimes/Archive3: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:26, 2 May 2006

Archived messages: Part 1 (Feb-Sep 2005) | Part 2 (Sep 2005-mid April 2006) | Part 3 (mid April 2006-Sep 2006) | Part 4 (Sep 2006-Mar 2007)

Mike Powell's

Hello Sam,

I've discovered that there are two Mike Powell's in county cricket. I've called them Mike Powell (Glamorgan cricketer) [1] and Mike Powell (Warwickshire cricketer) [2]. But at the moment, we have lots of articles linking to Michael Powell (cricketer). That currently redirects to the Welsh one, but both of them link to there, and I haven't had time to disentangle them all.

Stephen Turner (Talk) 17:59, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There was a third Mike Powell too who was around three or four years back. Tintin (talk) 06:41, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Old Skool Esperanzial note

Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. --Celestianpower ^háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pro 20

Sorry, didn't know that. I went to his talk page to drop a message, but it contains nothing but vandalism warnings ! I'll keep track of his edits to make sure that he doesn't start a new article. Thanks. Tintin (talk) 06:41, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Australia In England 2005 Duplication

I've finished my summary of the tour for the Australian cricket team in England in 2005 page. I believe the detailed match summaries are duplicated elsewhere, when I check that I'll make sure that any that can be moved/deleted are moved/deleted (not sure about the warm-up matches, but the Tests are definitely repeated somewhere). It won't be done for a while yet, but it's on my list of things to do (I just haven't added that list to my userpage yet).

Paddyohale 18:32, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Time for a new RfA?

After browsing through Your contributions and the talk archives I wonder if You would consider again getting nominated for adminship. I believe the offer from ALoan is also still in effect. Please think about it (and reply...). Remember, the 1st RfA was just a warm-up. feydey 23:57, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kjetil r as admin on commons

Hi! The norwegians have put foreward an admin request on commons, commons:Template:Administrators/Requests and votes/Kjetil r. It would be nice to have your votes! — John Erling Blad (no) 21:39, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 ==Time for a new RfA?==
 After browsing through Your contributions and the talk archives I wonder if You would consider again getting nominated for adminship. I believe the offer from [[User:ALoan|ALoan]] is also still in effect. Please think about it (and reply...). Remember, the 1st RfA was just a warm-up. [[User:Feydey|feydey]] 23:57, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
+==[[:commons:user:Kjetil r|Kjetil r]] as admin on commons==
+Hi! The norwegians have put foreward an admin request on commons, [[:commons:Template:Administrators/Requests and votes/Kjetil r]]. It would be nice to have your votes! — ''[[User talk:Agtfjott|John Erling Blad]]'' ([[:no:user:agtfjott|no]]) 21:39, 2 May 2006 (UTC)