User talk:Semitransgenic

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Statement at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically modified organisms

Hi Semitransgenic. You recently added a statement at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically modified organisms. The case has been opened and new statements are no longer allowed. Evidence is welcome at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically modified organisms/Evidence until 12 October 2015. Thanks, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 20:39, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Re: Removal of sourced content from Electronic dance music

Since there isn't an article on EDM festivals as a concept in general, I think the removal of that information was simply arbitrary because you didn't like the EDM page to be used as an "anti-drug platform". These issues emphasize a major contrast between these commercially-sanctioned events and the unsanctioned rave culture of the past. ViperSnake151 Talk 20:25, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting edits

Please refrain from reverting my edits. The AFDs are justified, and if you are positive of the articles' notability, then you have nothing to worry about. I, on the other hand, have deemed those articles as dubious in the own right, and symptomatic of a much larger music genre issue at Wikipedia and think it is something the community should discuss.--Coin945 (talk) 13:56, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have since withdrawn all of my AFDs. Thanks.--Coin945 (talk) 14:47, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Your recent editing history at Shah Rukh Khan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Human3015^TALK 22:01, 15 November 2015 \ (UTC)

shit!!! o nooooooo, the white hand of DOOOOMMMMMM!!!!! AHHHHHHHHH....... Semitransgenic _talk. 22:07, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Human3015^TALK 22:28, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

oh shit, nooooo, is someone going to spank me now? Semitransgenic _talk. 22:33, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You should cool down first. You are suppose to be polite while editing Wikipedia. You are experienced enough editor, you should set an example for other new editors by your behavior. Editors like you usually lose their reputation or community trust and their edits are not taken as seriously. Regards. --Human3015^TALK 23:35, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

dude, I'm like totally cool, but thank you for your words of support, peace out, word. Semitransgenic _talk. 23:45, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Novembre 2015

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically modified organisms/Proposed decision. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. NativeForeigner ^Talk 01:05, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically modified organisms/Proposed decision. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. You're continuing to push the envelope. While I understand you have a problem with Jytdog, your edits here are doing nothing to help the situation, they merely inflame it. NativeForeigner ^Talk 01:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for personal attacks and incivility. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Roger Davies ^talk 01:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]