User talk:Somerset999

September 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

A page you started (Inokuchi Station (Ishikawa)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Inokuchi Station (Ishikawa), Nguyen QuocTrung!

Wikipedia editor Ymblanter just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks a lot for creating articles on the statsions on the Hokuriku Railroad Ishikawa Line. It would be great if you could also add sources to these articles.

To reply, leave a comment on Ymblanter's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Invitation to talk

Hi

You are invited in Milan Malpensa airport talk about a service to be considered seasonal because of a temporary suspension.

thank you Riktetta Riktetta (talk) 20:03, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Fleet as of date

I have had to revert some of your as of dates changed on airline fleet sections as they are not supported by the reference. If you change it to October 2019 then you need a current citation, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 09:35, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

I see you are still doing it - please dont change the date without providing a new reference you are just creating work to revert all your changes. MilborneOne (talk) 18:53, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

On which page? Tell me so I can fix it. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 19:00, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Most of them I have looked at the dates of the citations dont match October 2019, it would be a long list. Flybe was one that you changed a few minutes ago, the reference is dated June 2018 not October 2019. MilborneOne (talk) 19:06, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Ok, will fix them right away:))) Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 19:11, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Bamboo Airways

Hi, Bamboo Airways currently does not operate any Boeing 787. The first 787 leased from GECAS will be delivered this month. --Tomasprg (talk) 11:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

I don’t know anyting about this, could you provide some sources to confirm that? Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 17:04, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I have added a citation to the article, the Bamboo Airways official Press Release released on October 24, 2019 here. I reverted your editing. Can you prove that Bamboo Airways already operates a Boeing 787? --Tomasprg (talk) 18:01, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Please do not put incorrect information in the article Bamboo Airways. Bamboo Airways does not operate any Boeing 787 aircraft now. I have cited a source of information that is official and newer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomasprg (talk • contribs) 00:25, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

???. What do you mean? You are the person giving false information, not me. You are new in here so read the rules before editing. Cheers :))) Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 04:53, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I'm adding a few more links: here, here, here. I have not seen any evidence from your side that Bamboo Airways has Boeing 787 in its fleet at the moment. --Tomasprg (talk) 10:45, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Ref 1 and 2 are not reliable, ref 3 said they are take deliveries for 2 Boeing 787-9 so those aircrafts are in their fleet. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 12:32, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Vandalism

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Mole mole 2 (talk) 12:12, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

I didn’t, actually you’re the person who vandalized it. I’ve been working for a long time and always follow Wikipedia rules. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 12:46, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

It is wrong. You don't know what "Gallery" is. Gallery means a state where many images are arranged.This is the only image I have added. Nevertheless, you removed this from here. This is too violent vandalism. I will request your post block soon. If you don't like it, answer the next question. Why did you remove only this image ? There are many other images on this page, why did you remove only this ?--Mole mole 2 (talk) 13:24, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

If you really want to add this image, don’t put that in fleet section, create your gallery in there. And you thinks you can block me? You could try it, I’ll wait. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 15:55, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

You said that my image should not put in "fleet" section. So, I put it "History" section. Is it OK ? If I put image in "History", Sentences and image become connect so will become more lucid.--Mole mole 2 (talk) 05:24, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

I thinks it’s okay for me. No problems. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 06:07, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

So sorry if you think my edits are wrong because I do not know the correct way of editing and publishing, and stating the correct reason for the edits. But, I can confidently say that my edits on the airlines and destinations do not need sources because I work in the airport itself and I am handling all the flights inbound and outbound of Singapore. Well I can also safely say that there are a few destinations that are not stated in the page. idboizz (talk) 16:45, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Lufthansa Fleet Edit

Why did you undo my updated of the Lufthansa fleet that I made last night? (My IP Adress has changed since I made the edit) 2601:640:C002:9300:C858:2557:8DC9:60E3 (talk) 21:26, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Reason on the summary. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 04:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

What part of it was unsourced? 2601:640:C002:9300:951E:55AF:4B1A:B1BA (talk) 09:43, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

You didn’t give any source when editing so it’s unsourced.Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 14:08, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

The source I used was already cited on the page, so all I did was change the the date in the reference. 2601:640:C002:9300:253E:F17A:ABD2:7691 (talk) 22:27, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Planespotters.net not reliable?

Why is Planespotters.net not a reliable source? 2601:640:C002:9300:1199:7276:7E8E:2B5A (talk) 16:44, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Self-published source. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 17:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

I don't understand what you mean? 2601:640:C002:9300:1199:7276:7E8E:2B5A (talk) 17:40, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Planespotters.net is self-published source. Actually don’t usually use them when we have a better source 😅. Please read Wikipedia policy to know more. Thanks for asking! Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 18:19, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

What sites would be better sources? 2601:640:C002:9300:C955:3965:7706:8599 (talk) 19:57, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Korean Air

Hello, please advise why my edit was deemed "not related". It has been added into the section "Loyalty programme", explaining where its name comes from. Thanks Goodwillgames (talk) 12:31, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Extensive information about the airline's frequent flyer program and amenities, etc should not be included. Remember that Wikipedia is not a travel guide so please focus on aircraft and airline destinations. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 12:44, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

By focusing on airline destinations we would make a travel guide; by focusing on etymology of the Air Line names and schemes we make an encyclopedia. Aircraft models and routes’ details are already well available in the company’s website, whilst additions such as mine give alternative information to the corporate ones. By removing my entry, you just made the explanation of the whole company’s product less comprehensive. I intend to revert your edit and bring it to the Talk page for others to comment Goodwillgames (talk) 13:47, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Ok, go ahead Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 14:11, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

TAP Air Portugal

• Greetings, Nguyen QuocTrung. The reference in question about the TAP fleet is this one: https://www.dinheirovivo.pt/empresas/tap-ja-tem-uma-frota-com-100-avioes-estima-receber-mais-10-neste-ano/. It is in portuguese, the title being "TAP already has a fleet with 100 airplanes and expects to receive more then in this year.". In the corporate website of TAP, in english, there is an indication that the company has now more than 100 airplanes. Maybe we could put something such as "100+" in the fleet size, in the infobox? Thank you in advance and best regards, -- ajpvalente (talk) 14:49, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

No, we need exact numbers of aircraft in the infobox, not "100+". And if you want to update the infobox, you have to update the fleet table as well. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 15:36, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Right, I understand. Considering this was the latest news report about this subject, can we at least update the fleet numbers based on this, to 100 or 110? Thank you, -- ajpvalente (talk) 16:59, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Nope, I don’t think so, we need to update the number of aircraft in the fleet table. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 18:14, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. However, I am not sure what really is the problem. You need to know precisely the number of airplanes of each type and model? -- ajpvalente (talk) 10:06, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Etihad Airways codeshare partners

Hello Nguyen QuocTrung, I just realized you removed my edit on Etihad Airways codeshare partners because I didn't provide a source for adding Avianca. Well, the source was already there on cite note number 58 (the general cite note, which takes you to https://www.etihad.com/en-ae/fly-etihad/our-partners (the airline's official site) and you can find Avianca over there.

It prolly was my mistake for having edited the list without pointing out cite number 58 as the source. Now that I have explained the reason, please do not revert the edit again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mekanos (talk • contribs) 19:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for your explanation, next time please write the source on the summary section to minimize the risk of being reverted. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 06:43, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Logan International Airport

Hello Nguyen QuocTrung, I saw that you removed my edit on Logan International Airport citing the lack of a reliable source. So, you're telling me that the actual airline itself is only a "booking site" and not a reliable source despite the site showing the new routes?

Well, on other pages, such as Asheville Regional Airport, McGhee Tyson Airport, Northern Kentucky International Airport, Newark Liberty International Airport the same type of citation was prexisting and accepted. This one: Fort Walton Beach Airport has no citations at all Please go nitpick those edits as well if my citation is so unacceptable.

I have re-added the edit I made, with a more appropriate citation to the standard of the other citations on the page.

Well, those articles you listed is not on my watchlist so I can’t check them. Btw, thanks for re-edit on Logan International Airport. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 14:02, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

KLM Fleet

Please do not revert my changes as they match the already cited source.

Who are you? Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 10:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

I'm Tram2 I work for KLM as a Duty Director. The source I cite is an official KLM publication. So who are you? Why do you keep reverting my changes as I did cite them.

Wow, I’m appreciating your work but you’re editing unsourced and you need to stop that. Thanks. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 16:16, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

What is wrong with this source "Fleet". KLM. Retrieved 15 January 2020. as it is an official KLM publication? At least much more reliable than "KLM Royal Dutch Airlines Fleet Details and History". Planespotters.net. Retrieved 5 December 2019.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) which is just a site for hobbyists.

This source closely affiliated with the subject so it’s not a third party source, please read Examples section on WP:IS. Thank you. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 08:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Well, at least it is accurate. And the numbers shown on the wikipage are not. KLM has 8 747's in the fleet. PH-BFH, PH-BFL, PH-BFN, PH-BFY are full pax. PH-BFS, PH-BFT, PH-BFV, PH-BFW are combined pax/cargo aircraft. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tram2 (talk • contribs) 08:44, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

But how can I know those numbers are accurate or not? Sorry, maybe your source published by KLM but we can’t use that here because it violated Wikipedia policy. Could you find any independent source which provides the right number? Thanks and keep supporting Wikipedia. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 08:56, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Well I'm tired of the discussion. Now I know how reliable Wikipedia is. It prefers a independent hobbyist site over a check-able company source. I'll stop donating and contributing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tram2 (talk • contribs) 09:13, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Sadly but Wikipedia work like that. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 09:30, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

American Mainline from Dallas/Fort Worth to Harrisburg

Hey there, I saw you reverted my edit. I saw American Mainline service beginning in April on the Harrisburg Wikipedia page. Could you please look into that before closing this case? Thanks! -Fantech

I’m sorry, what Wikipedia page? Could you provide the link for me? Thanks. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 17:33, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Oh, I understand now but in Wikipedia, when you editing, you have to provide the source to prove you’re right. So I still have to reverting your edits. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 17:49, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

No problem. I understand to. Thanks! -Fantech

Source

It was the same source cited originally. Yes, Twitter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.176.159.64 (talk) 16:37, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Sorry for the reversal in Talk:2019–20 outbreak of novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV

Rookie mistake, I got mixed up and saw your comment in page history thinking that it was on the main article page (and I thus thought it was vandalism). Please be aware it was not intentional. My apologies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tezakhiago (talk • contribs) 20:45, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

No problem, be careful next time. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 20:48, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Canada

Has it not been confirmed now that the suspected case in Canada is real? Ask ehx udnd (talk) 08:25, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Both are confirmed. Maplesyrupcan (talk) 17:16, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Canada case

You don't understand because you didn't look at the news that the case in Canada has been confirmed https://3g.dxy.cn/newh5/view/pneumonia Eray08yigit (talk) 06:34, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

See talk page

They just want a second lab to verify, however by the standards used by every other country both cases are confirmed. Maplesyrupcan (talk) 17:14, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Your edits to Wuhan virus table

Hi Nguyen QuocTrung.

1) Please stop reverting other people's edits on the case total on China. Just because their number doesn't match the number on dxy.cn doesn't mean it's wrong. dxy.cn has made mistakes too. 2) If you're aware of some MOS thing that discourages footnotes, then take it to the discussion on the Talk page, and we'll have a group discussion. In the meantime, stop reverting my footnote. --Jw 193 (talk) 17:17, 31 January 2020 (UTC)