User talk:Thisisashan

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

Template:Z7--Orange Mike | Talk 04:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

@Orangemike: The Wikipedia policies are ignored in cases of favoritism and excused where they are not favorable. In fact, PRIOR to your blocking me, the 'threats' were already removed. Calling out harassment is not against Wikipedia's guidelines is it? No. It is not. You were used as a tool to silence an opposing viewpoint. It is disgusting and all people involved should feel ashamed, but they most obviously will not. Just like they don't feel ashamed about going against the guidelines of Wikipedia themselves, unlike me, doing so knowingly. Did you guys assume best intentions? No you did not. Is there a maintained neutral point of view when the antifemnist is bullied out of the antifeminist section due to little more than opinions which conflict with the feminist that polices the antifeminist section? No, there is not.

Meanwhile the same feminist that attempts to report me for misconduct resorts to making fun of my age in JAPANESE because she wishes to evade censors for her ageism. Leave it to a Genders Studies Major to think that one is clever, because no one in the world can translate. She is a bigoted, hypocritical, anti-intellectual failure of a human being. Study womens rights for a living just to resort to discrimination based upon age. Respect elders in academia? No. But thank you for supporting her and her libel, lies and slander. You have shown me what Wikipedia is here for, a joke.

Congrats on the policy of legal action not being beneficial for contribution, you just retained a Gender Studies Major who is willing to Lie, commit Libel knowingly, and commit to actual personal attacks (while accusing someone of a personal attack, wrongfully) and lost someone who was actually here to fix the issue with Wikipedia not properly representing Men's Rights. *slow clap*

Way to show the world that Wikipedia doesn't care about the rights of men. Way to show the world that Wikipedia wishes to trample on legal rights. Way to show the world that on Wikipedia, mob mentality is what is important. Facts? Wikipedia, "No thanks." Evidence? Wikipedia, "Hell no, that is synonymous with _primary source_." Mob mentality.

Frankly Orangemike, go ahead and upgrade my ban back to permanent like it was initially. When I am going university to university this Summer, I will make sure and bring up Wikipedia to make sure that everyone knows it is to stay out of academia, where facts and evidence belong, not mob mentality. Wikipedia will remain a joke for decades.Thisisashan (talk) 20:24, 20 May 2016 (UTC)