User talk:Youngamerican: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by Kayball - "→Deletion of Kayball: new section" |
No edit summary |
||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
I saw that you deleted the page Kayball. I dont understand why this was done because it is a real game and is being referenced for rules and things of that nature. I would appreciate it if you could undelete it however I am not sure you can do that, if so that would be great. Thanks. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Kayball|Kayball]] ([[User talk:Kayball|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kayball|contribs]]) 16:04, 28 July 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
I saw that you deleted the page Kayball. I dont understand why this was done because it is a real game and is being referenced for rules and things of that nature. I would appreciate it if you could undelete it however I am not sure you can do that, if so that would be great. Thanks. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Kayball|Kayball]] ([[User talk:Kayball|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kayball|contribs]]) 16:04, 28 July 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
We are actively attempting to make a fully compilable article for the sport of kayball... Please stop deleting it while it is under construction |
Revision as of 00:26, 29 July 2009
- Archive 1
- Archive 2
- Archive 3
- Archive 4
- Archive 5
- Archive 6
- Archive 7
- Archive 8
- Archive 9
- Archive 10
- Archive 11
Pwned? On a spaghetti-sauce-masquerading-as-chili-argument?
No not really. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 02:21, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- oops, my bad Don't know why I thought that, sorry!! You from Kentucky then? You're interested in Southern Ohio, so my assessment of your location belief stems from that. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 17:56, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the helpful guidelines and suggestions! JWithing (talk) 15:01, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Jerem43
I noticed that you nominated Jerem43 for administration. While I cannot know what qualifies an individual for Wikipedia administration, I would hope individuals that have recently violated Wikipedia's own policies and guidelines on cavility and courtesy. Please refer to this discussion to inform your opinions. If such behavior and attitude is condoned, I have no issue.
152.16.10.191 (talk) 18:47, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- I'm WP:AGF on his attempt to remove a spam link, but I've removed them for the time being to let Jerem43 decide how to proceed. Cheers. youngamerican (wtf?) 19:08, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Just to let you know I have established a check user on this guy, made three days ago when this issue arose. He keeps re-adding a spam link to a company that specializes in franchise management to this article that was originally made by a SPA called User:Franchiseguru. He has been violating rules regarding legal threats while evading the point, his personal attack comments refer to a simple L1 warning I gave him when he started restoring the links I was deleting. I have been trying to keep out of an edit war, and have removed all of the stuff he is claiming as plagiarism.--Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 20:57, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- If there is something to discuss about the article, I welcome further discussion on that article's discussion page. I'm simply here trying to inform User:Youngamerican that he or she may wish to observe current behavior and attitude in dealing with a conflict opinion. When nominating someone to be an administrator, one hopes that they would uphold each and every policy of the site, especially the ones that deal with communication. I believe that the rude and course manner in which you address my concerns is not very becoming. It brings doubts to any ability to an effective administrator. I bring up concerns here, as I don't really care if you continue the nomination or not, I just enjoy all facts being known.
- The concerned is doubled when I see that Jarem43 has felt the need to delete my questions and comments from his own talk page, without addressing them. It suggests that he is attempting to hide certain behaviors that he is aware are inappropriate. One then questions what other comments in the past have been removed that might also have reflected poorly.152.16.10.191 (talk) 16:24, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Wal-Mart (disambiguation) at DR
Just letting you know that the discussion for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wal-Mart (disambiguation) (3rd nomination) has been listed for deletion review at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 July 15. You may be interested in commenting.Tatterfly (talk) 14:02, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Southern Ohio
Do you know any editors from southern Ohio who are active? I'd like to see if someone could get a photo for a specific location, but I can't do that until I can find someone to ask. Thanks! Nyttend (talk) 22:11, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello! Why did you create this as a redirect to an article in which the product is not even mentioned? —David Levy 12:10, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Deletion of Kayball
I saw that you deleted the page Kayball. I dont understand why this was done because it is a real game and is being referenced for rules and things of that nature. I would appreciate it if you could undelete it however I am not sure you can do that, if so that would be great. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kayball (talk • contribs) 16:04, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
We are actively attempting to make a fully compilable article for the sport of kayball... Please stop deleting it while it is under construction