Venus of Hohle Fels: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Berlant (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:


==Description==
==Description==
The figurine is a representation of a woman, putting emphasis on the [[vulva]] and the [[breast]]s. Consequently it is presumed to be an amulet related to [[fertility]]. It is made of a [[woolly mammoth]] [[tusk]] and had broken into fragments, of which six have been recovered, with the left arm and shoulder still missing. In place of the head, the figurine has a perforation so that it could have been worn as a [[pendant]]. [[Archaeologist]] John J. Shea suggests it would have taken "tens if not hundreds of hours" to carve the figurine.<ref name=latimes/>
The figurine was sculpted from a [[woolly mammoth]] tusk and had broken into fragments, of which six have been recovered, with the left arm and shoulder still missing. In place of the head, the figurine which probably took "tens if not hundreds of hours" to carve <ref name=latimes/> has a perforated protrusion, which may have allowed its owner to wear it as an amulet.


Specialists and people in general have naturally assumed that the figurine was sculpted to represent a woman with a grossly exaggerated abdomen, vulva and breasts. But a recent theory compares the figurine to the [[Venus of Willendorf]], and invokes aspects of the archaeological, mythological, and linguistic record to support its assertion that the figurine was actually sculpted to personify the developmental stage of a volvate mushroom as the mushroom’s mother with a prominent vulva holding the mature mushroom in its arms. <ref> Berlant, Stephen (July, 2011). The Venus of Hohle Fels: Its Entheomycological Significance in Relation to The Venus of Willendorf and Other, Anthropoid, Female Figurines. http://www.anistor.gr/english/index.htm Art Section</ref>
==See also==
==See also==
*[[Venus of Willendorf]]
*[[Venus of Willendorf]]

Revision as of 18:58, 4 July 2011

Venus of Hohle Fels (true height 6 cm (2.4 in))

The Venus of Hohle Fels (also known as the Venus of Schelklingen; in German variously Venus vom Hohlen Fels, vom Hohle Fels; Venus von Schelklingen) is an Upper Paleolithic Venus figurine found near Schelklingen, Germany. It is dated to between 35,000 and 40,000 years ago, belonging to the early Aurignacian, at the very beginning of the Upper Paleolithic, which is associated with the assumed earliest presence of Homo sapiens in Europe (Cro-Magnon). It is the oldest undisputed example of Upper Paleolithic art and figurative prehistoric art in general.

Context

The Swabian Alb region has a number of caves that have yielded mammoth ivory artifacts of the Upper Paleolithic period, totaling about twenty-five items to date. These include the lion-headed figure of Hohlenstein-Stadel and an ivory flute found at Geißenklösterle, dated to 36,000 years ago.[1] This concentration of evidence of full behavioral modernity in the period of 40 to 30 thousand years ago, including figurative art and instrumental music, is unique worldwide and Conard speculates that the bearers of the Aurignacian culture in the Swabian Alb may be credited with the invention, not just of figurative art and music, but possibly, early religion as well.[2][3] In a distance of 70cm to the Venus figurine Conard's team found a flute made from a vulture bone.[4] Additional artifacts excavated from the same cave layer included flint-knapping debris, worked bone, and carved ivory as well as remains of tarpans, reindeer, cave bears, woolly mammoths, and Alpine Ibexes.[3]

Discovery and significance

The discovery of the Venus of Hohle Fels pushes back the date of the oldest prehistoric sculpture, and arguably the oldest known figurative art altogether,[5] by several millennia,[6] establishing that works of art were being produced throughout the Aurignacian Period.[7]

The figurine was discovered in September 2008 in a cave called Hohle Fels (Swabian German for "hollow rock") near Schelklingen, some 15 km (9 mi) west of Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, in southwestern Germany, by a team from the University of Tübingen led by archaeology professor Nicholas Conard, who reported their find in Nature.[8] The figurine was found in the cave hall, about 20 m (66 ft) from the entrance and about 3 m (10 ft) below the current ground level. Also found in the cave was a bone flute dating to approximately 35,000 years ago, the oldest known musical instrument.[9]

Description

The figurine was sculpted from a woolly mammoth tusk and had broken into fragments, of which six have been recovered, with the left arm and shoulder still missing. In place of the head, the figurine — which probably took "tens if not hundreds of hours" to carve [3] — has a perforated protrusion, which may have allowed its owner to wear it as an amulet.

Specialists and people in general have naturally assumed that the figurine was sculpted to represent a woman with a grossly exaggerated abdomen, vulva and breasts. But a recent theory compares the figurine to the Venus of Willendorf, and invokes aspects of the archaeological, mythological, and linguistic record to support its assertion that the figurine was actually sculpted to personify the developmental stage of a volvate mushroom as the mushroom’s mother with a prominent vulva holding the mature mushroom in its arms. [10]

See also

Notes and references

  1. ^ http://www.mus.cam.ac.uk/~ic108/lithoacoustics/BAR2002/BARpreprint.pdf
  2. ^ Älteste Menschenfigur der Welt gefunden Südwestrundfunk 14 May 2009.
  3. ^ a b c Maugh II, Thomas H. (May 14, 2009). "Venus figurine sheds light on origins of art by early humans". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2009-05-14.
  4. ^ http://www.epoc.de/artikel/999323&_z=798890
  5. ^ The grid or cross-hatch patterns patterns found engraved at the Blombos Cave in South Africa, dating to 75,000 years ago, may or may not be considered "abstract art".
  6. ^ by at least 5,000 years, if the 35,000 BP date is compared to that of the Venus of Galgenberg, or by as much as 10,000 years if the 40,000 BP date is accepted.
  7. ^ Henderson, Mark (2009-05-13). "Prehistoric female figure 'earliest piece of erotic art uncovered'". The Times. Retrieved 2009-05-13. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  8. ^ Conard, Nicholas J. "A female figurine from the basal Aurignacian of Hohle Fels Cave in southwestern Germany" (PDF). Nature. 459 (7244): 248–252. doi:10.1038/nature07995. PMID 19444215. Retrieved 2009-05-13. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  9. ^ Wilford, John N. (June 24, 2009). "Flutes Offer Clues to Stone-Age Music". The New York Times. 459 (7244): 248–52. doi:10.1038/nature07995. PMID 19444215. Retrieved June 29, 2009. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  10. ^ Berlant, Stephen (July, 2011). The Venus of Hohle Fels: Its Entheomycological Significance in Relation to The Venus of Willendorf and Other, Anthropoid, Female Figurines. http://www.anistor.gr/english/index.htm Art Section

External links