Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 September 15: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎[[Hitomi Tachikawa]]: closing (del. endorsed)
Line 14: Line 14:
Please notify the administrator who performed the action that you wish to be reviewed by leaving {{subst:DRVNote|page name}} on their talk page.
Please notify the administrator who performed the action that you wish to be reviewed by leaving {{subst:DRVNote|page name}} on their talk page.
-->
-->


==== [[Hitomi Tachikawa]] ====
:''[http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:3QY3XEs6J8YJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitomi_Tachikawa+%22Hitomi+Tachikawa%22&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1 Google cache]''
I am reqesting that this page be restored on three grounds.
*That the bazarrity and uniqueness of the subject itself (a pornographic actress from Japan with two vaginal canals) warrants at the very least a mentioning in some manner.
*That the page in question was deleted in haste by [[User:Shell Kinney]] who, by her own admission on her userpage, would "love to see a more liberal vanity clause added to the speedy deletion criteria", even though she also admits that "it would be too easy to exploit".
*That I (although I may be mistaken about my standing on this particular matter) was not notified prior to the deletion by [[User:Shell Kinney]]--evidently, this is common problem .[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Deletion_policy#Informing_the_creators_is_being_ignored]

I am aware of the nature of the topic in the deleted article, but freakshow-curiosity not-with-standing, I believe it is worth preserving given the fact that when using Yahoo.com's search (using: ''china twins two vaginas''), I was able to locate three related articles concerning twin births involving this condition (the births themselves occurred [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3011241.stm in Brazil], [http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2005/10/31/twin-wombs-051031.html in Great Britain] [http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2002-11/13/content_628422.htm and in Continental China]). I have found little information about this condition called "[[Uterine Didelphys]]" either on wikipedia or on the Internet in general. I was originally planning on writing an article on wikipedia, but neither then or now do I consider myself qualified to write seriously about it, hence the reason it was forgotten about completely until I had noticed that the [[Hitomi Tachikawa]] article had been deleted. This article was intended to stand in relation to the subject of Japanese pornography, but I had also intended to link in to any relavant medical or anatomical pages and articles upon collecting sufficent data.

Thank you for hearing my plea.
[[User:Sweetfreek|Sweetfreek]] 04:09, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Endorse deletion''' after looking at the Google cache version. Anatomical abnormality is not a claim to notability, and two movies is far, far away from fulfilling [[WP:PORN]]. There's an Allmusic review of one of the movies among the twenty-ish Google hits though, so no objection to a rewrite that actually tries to establish notability, or a mention in the [[Uterine Didelphys]] article. ~ [[User:Trialsanderrors|trialsanderrors]] 18:58, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''Endorse deletion''' as per [[User:Trialsanderrors]] [[User:Bwithh|Bwithh]] 00:48, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
*If there's no more than the 3 documented cases from Google, then I would say this situation is so rare, sufferers will certainly be notable because of it. Wasn't physical deformity part of the porn guidelines? If so, it should be like WP:MUSIC. You shouldn't neccesarily fulfill all of the possible guidelines. Fitting 1 or 2 of them is sufficient. (A musician doesn't need 2 albums if he's also played the title role in a film or was part of another notable band.) - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 10:18, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''Endorse deletion''' per our biography guidelines. [[WP:PORN_BIO]] is not policy yet, and she would not come close to passing it even if it were. Hell, I've ''dated'' people who are closer to passing [[WP:PORN_BIO]] than this! Also, physical deformity by itself is generally not notable except in truly exceptional cases, such as [[Chang and Eng Bunker]] (who have multiple published biographies). [[User:Starblind|Andrew Lenahan]] - <b><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT></b> 14:29, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:41, 20 September 2006

Full reviews may be found in this page history. For a summary, see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Recently concluded (2006 September)

15 September 2006