Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 September 4: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Lazy Dork]]: closing (del. endorsed) |
→[[civil engineering quiz]]: closing (del. endorsed) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Please notify the administrator who performed the action that you wish to be reviewed by leaving {{subst:DRVNote|page name}} on their talk page. |
Please notify the administrator who performed the action that you wish to be reviewed by leaving {{subst:DRVNote|page name}} on their talk page. |
||
--> |
--> |
||
====[[civil engineering quiz]]==== |
|||
*'''Comment''' This DRV was filed by {{user|Cailler}}, but they placed nothing under the heading to explain why the DRV had been filed. If Cailler does not give a reason for the DRV reasonably soon, it will probably be deleted. --[[User:ais523|ais523]] 14:54, 4 September 2006 ([[User:ais523|U]][[User talk:ais523|T]][[Special:Contributions/Ais523|C]]) |
|||
**I can't imagine how they'll argue that this belongs here -- it looks like it's an attempt to use Wikipedia as a free webspace rather than an attempt to make an article. --[[User:Improv|Improv]] 17:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Endorse deletion'''. Wikipedia is not the place to post abstracts of new research and articles should NEVER start with a question. This appears to have essay material and OR written all over it. - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 09:11, 5 September 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Endorse deletion''', allow userfication if Cailler wants the text for something else. Looks like a perosnal essay. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> 13:49, 5 September 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' Cailler wants the text for something else. Please allow userfication. - [[User:cailler|cailler]] 9 September 2006 |
|||
Revision as of 16:17, 9 September 2006
- Full reviews may be found in this page history. For a summary, see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Recently concluded (2006 September)