Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Duplekita: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Oiyarbepsy (talk | contribs) oops |
→Draft:Duplekita: ridiculous troll |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*'''Keep''' - The content at [[Duplekita]] was only deleted because of your [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User%3ATrekie9001%2FDuplekita inappropriate move]. As the content was nominated for deletion and subsequently deleted, it clearly wasn't [[WP:STALEDRAFT|suitable for the mainspace]]. You actually !voted "Delete per nom, thanks for the good analysis" in the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duplekita|deletion discussion]]. I contested the deletion and requested restoration in a proper namespace via the proper process. This nomination is mischaracterizing and further [[WP:DISRUPT|disruption]] by {{noping|Legacypac}}.<small>—[[User:Godsy|<span style="color:MediumSpringGreen;">Godsy</span>]]<sup>([[User_talk:Godsy|TALK]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">[[Special:Contributions/Godsy|<span style="color:Goldenrod;">CONT</span>]])</sub></small> 23:35, 2 April 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' - The content at [[Duplekita]] was only deleted because of your [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User%3ATrekie9001%2FDuplekita inappropriate move]. As the content was nominated for deletion and subsequently deleted, it clearly wasn't [[WP:STALEDRAFT|suitable for the mainspace]]. You actually !voted "Delete per nom, thanks for the good analysis" in the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duplekita|deletion discussion]]. I contested the deletion and requested restoration in a proper namespace via the proper process. This nomination is mischaracterizing and further [[WP:DISRUPT|disruption]] by {{noping|Legacypac}}.<small>—[[User:Godsy|<span style="color:MediumSpringGreen;">Godsy</span>]]<sup>([[User_talk:Godsy|TALK]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">[[Special:Contributions/Godsy|<span style="color:Goldenrod;">CONT</span>]])</sub></small> 23:35, 2 April 2016 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep and {{tl|trout}}''' for these never-ending time-wasting requests to delete drafts. [[User:Oiyarbepsy|Oiyarbepsy]] ([[User talk:Oiyarbepsy/justasig|talk]]) 01:47, 3 April 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Keep and {{tl|trout}}''' for these never-ending time-wasting requests to delete drafts. [[User:Oiyarbepsy|Oiyarbepsy]] ([[User talk:Oiyarbepsy/justasig|talk]]) 01:47, 3 April 2016 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' Godsy is the time waster bring back a deleted draft and he is uncivil to boot. Misrepresents my actions amd acts like a complete troll. Get a life amd stop stalking my edits Godsy. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 06:53, 3 April 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:53, 3 April 2016
Draft:Duplekita
This page was deleted at AfD just recently Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duplekita. As such the restoration to draftspace is pointless unless someone can establish notability. This should be deleted as disruption and per the AfD. Legacypac (talk) 21:51, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - The content at Duplekita was only deleted because of your inappropriate move. As the content was nominated for deletion and subsequently deleted, it clearly wasn't suitable for the mainspace. You actually !voted "Delete per nom, thanks for the good analysis" in the deletion discussion. I contested the deletion and requested restoration in a proper namespace via the proper process. This nomination is mischaracterizing and further disruption by Legacypac.—Godsy(TALKCONT) 23:35, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep and {{trout}} for these never-ending time-wasting requests to delete drafts. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 01:47, 3 April 2016 (UTC)