Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment: Difference between revisions
Rschen7754 (talk | contribs) Reverted good faith edits by 42.117.236.60 (talk): Rm non-english text. (TW) |
John Cline (talk | contribs) Arbitration request for clarification |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
= {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment|Requests for clarification and amendment|[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment|Requests for clarification and amendment]]}} = |
= {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment|Requests for clarification and amendment|[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment|Requests for clarification and amendment]]}} = |
||
<noinclude>{{-}}</noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/Header}} |
<noinclude>{{-}}</noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/Header}} |
||
== Clarification request: [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds|Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds]]/[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds#Kiefer.Wolfowitz banned|Kiefer.Wolfowitz banned]] == |
|||
'''Initiated by ''' —[[User:John Cline|John Cline]] ([[User talk:John Cline|talk]]) '''at''' 10:33, 12 November 2013 (UTC) |
|||
;Case or decision affected: |
|||
:{{RFARlinks|Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds}} |
|||
:[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds#Kiefer.Wolfowitz banned|Kiefer.Wolfowitz banned]] |
|||
''List of any users involved or directly affected, and confirmation that all are aware of the request:'' |
|||
*{{userlinks|John Cline}} (initiator) |
|||
*{{userlinks|Kiefer.Wolfowitz}} |
|||
*{{admin|Richwales}} |
|||
*{{userlinks|Equazcion}} |
|||
*{{userlinks|Beyond My Ken}} |
|||
*{{admin|Nikkimaria}} |
|||
=== Statement by John Cline === |
|||
Richwales raised a question regarding Kiefer.Wolfowitz's talk page edits in relation to his Arbcom ban.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2013&diff=581239803&oldid=581015727] Equazcion subsequently posted the incident at wp:ani[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=581253712&oldid=581249495] which erupted into a discussion without the potential for consensus. Eventually Beyond My Ken reverted Kiefer's talk page inclusion of an Arbcom voters guide[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz&diff=581298292&oldid=581261118] which Kiefer reverted with the following edit summary: "talk page guidelines prohibit such arbitrary action. take it to Arbitration committee enforcement, and stop acting like a cowboy".[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz&diff=next&oldid=581298292] Most users commenting seem to agree that this matter should be decided by the Committee, as do I. Curiously, Nikkimaria added Kiefer's voter guide to {{tlc|ACE2013}}[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:ACE2013&diff=581264104&oldid=581006415] which in my opinion, strains the spirit and letter of [[WP:BAN|our banning policy]]. Please tell me if Kiefer's talk page edits are acceptable in concert with his ban and evaluate Nikkimaria's decision to link his content in such fashion as has been shown. Thank you.—[[User:John Cline|John Cline]] ([[User talk:John Cline|talk]]) 10:33, 12 November 2013 (UTC) |
|||
=== Statement by {other user} === |
|||
<!-- Leave this section for others to add additional statements --> |
|||
=== Clerk notes === |
|||
: ''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).'' |
|||
=== Arbitrator views and discussion === |
|||
* |
|||
---- |
Revision as of 10:33, 12 November 2013
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.
Case name | Closed |
---|---|
Conflict of interest management | 13 Apr 2024 |
Mzajac | 7 May 2024 |
Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Clarification request: Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds/Kiefer.Wolfowitz banned|Clarification request: Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds/Kiefer.Wolfowitz banned]] | none | (orig. case) | 12 November 2013 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
Requests for clarification and amendment
Use this section to request clarification or amendment of a closed Arbitration Committee case or decision.
- Requests for clarification are used to ask for further guidance or clarification about an existing completed Arbitration Committee case or decision.
- Requests for amendment are used to ask for an amendment or extension of existing sanctions (for instance, because the sanctions are ineffective, contain a loophole, or no longer cover a sufficiently wide topic); or appeal for the removal of sanctions (including bans).
To file a clarification or amendment request: (you must use this format!)
- Choose one of the following options and open the page in a new tab or window:
- Click here to file a request for clarification of an arbitration decision or procedure.
- Click here to file a request for amendment of an arbitration decision or procedure (including an arbitration enforcement action issued by an administrator, such as a contentious topics restriction).
- Save your request and check that it looks how you think it should and says what you intended.
- If your request will affect or involve other users (including any users you have named as parties), you must notify these editors of your submission; you can use
{{subst:Arbitration CA notice|SECTIONTITLE}}
to do this. - Add the diffs of the talk page notifications under the applicable header of the request.
This is not a discussion. Please do not submit your request until it is ready for consideration; this is not a space for drafts, and incremental additions to a submission are disruptive.
Arbitrators or Clerks may summarily remove or refactor discussion without comment.
Requests from blocked or banned users should be made by e-mail directly to the Arbitration Committee.
Only Arbitrators and Clerks may remove requests from this page. Do not remove a request or any statements or comments unless you are in either of these groups. There must be no threaded discussion, so please comment only in your own section. Archived clarification and amendment requests are logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Clarification and Amendment requests. Numerous legacy and current shortcuts can be used to more quickly reach this page:
Clarification request: Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds/Kiefer.Wolfowitz banned
Initiated by —John Cline (talk) at 10:33, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- Case or decision affected
- Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds arbitration case (t) (ev / t) (w / t) (pd / t)
- Kiefer.Wolfowitz banned
List of any users involved or directly affected, and confirmation that all are aware of the request:
- John Cline (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (initiator)
- Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Richwales (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Equazcion (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Beyond My Ken (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Nikkimaria (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
Statement by John Cline
Richwales raised a question regarding Kiefer.Wolfowitz's talk page edits in relation to his Arbcom ban.[1] Equazcion subsequently posted the incident at wp:ani[2] which erupted into a discussion without the potential for consensus. Eventually Beyond My Ken reverted Kiefer's talk page inclusion of an Arbcom voters guide[3] which Kiefer reverted with the following edit summary: "talk page guidelines prohibit such arbitrary action. take it to Arbitration committee enforcement, and stop acting like a cowboy".[4] Most users commenting seem to agree that this matter should be decided by the Committee, as do I. Curiously, Nikkimaria added Kiefer's voter guide to {{ACE2013}}
[5] which in my opinion, strains the spirit and letter of our banning policy. Please tell me if Kiefer's talk page edits are acceptable in concert with his ban and evaluate Nikkimaria's decision to link his content in such fashion as has been shown. Thank you.—John Cline (talk) 10:33, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Statement by {other user}
Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).