Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amrit Lal (1960s Southern Punjab cricketer): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Keep. |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*'''Comment''' - oddly, most S. Punjab cricketers' articles are substantial in the main. I seem to remember many of these having been set up without me getting to them. Weird that. Other people doing work instead of me. [[User:Bobo192|Bobo]][[User talk:Bobo192|.]] 22:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' - oddly, most S. Punjab cricketers' articles are substantial in the main. I seem to remember many of these having been set up without me getting to them. Weird that. Other people doing work instead of me. [[User:Bobo192|Bobo]][[User talk:Bobo192|.]] 22:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' this article is a total failure of GNG.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 13:33, 8 January 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' this article is a total failure of GNG.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 13:33, 8 January 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' - So used to these happening that I think we've grown tired of !voting these days. [[User:Bobo192|Bobo]][[User talk:Bobo192|.]] 09:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:39, 12 January 2021
Amrit Lal (1960s Southern Punjab cricketer)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Amrit Lal (1960s Southern Punjab cricketer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No coverage found. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 22:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - oddly, most S. Punjab cricketers' articles are substantial in the main. I seem to remember many of these having been set up without me getting to them. Weird that. Other people doing work instead of me. Bobo. 22:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete this article is a total failure of GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:33, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - So used to these happening that I think we've grown tired of !voting these days. Bobo. 09:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)