Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austria–Georgia relations: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 12: Line 12:
*'''Delete''' One more un-notable combination and permutation. Mentally append my comment on recipes. [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 11:38, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' One more un-notable combination and permutation. Mentally append my comment on recipes. [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 11:38, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' The only useful content ever likely in this article are the links [[Foreign relations of Austria]] (which does not mention Georgia!) and [[Foreign relations of Georgia]] (which mentions only some trivial information about Austria, implying that there is nothing notable to say). Fails [[WP:WikiProject International relations#Bilateral relations|Bilateral relations]]. [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq|talk]]) 12:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' The only useful content ever likely in this article are the links [[Foreign relations of Austria]] (which does not mention Georgia!) and [[Foreign relations of Georgia]] (which mentions only some trivial information about Austria, implying that there is nothing notable to say). Fails [[WP:WikiProject International relations#Bilateral relations|Bilateral relations]]. [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq|talk]]) 12:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
*'''Strong keep''' - not sure about contemporary relations (but I suspect that for Georgia Austria is one of the most important foreign partners these days), but historically Austria-Hungary and its ambassador Georg von Franckenstein were instrumental in the formation of the first, shortlived Democratic Republic of Georgia, together with the German and the Ottoman empire. For literature on these relations, see this book [http://books.google.com/books?id=hK1nAAAAMAAJ&pgis=1] [[User:Stepopen|Stepopen]] ([[User talk:Stepopen|talk]]) 21:46, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:46, 27 May 2009

Austria–Georgia relations

Austria–Georgia relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

another random combination noting that Austria does not have any resident embassy. There have been no visits from Austrian leaders or ministers to Georgia and most of the bilateral treaties are minor in nature. [1]. Most searches reveal relations in a multilateral context especially Georgia-EU English search German search LibStar (talk) 06:43, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep since it does contain some information (date of diplomatic relations being established etc.) – you could also add in the fact that they are European partners. ╟─TreasuryTaghemicycle─╢ 11:03, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    do you have any reliable sources to prove bilateral relations. my searches in 2 languages could not find anything, simply establishing diplomatic relations is not enough for an article. LibStar (talk) 11:05, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I refer the honourable gentleman to the answer I gave here, plus the fact that I only gave a weak keep :) ╟─TreasuryTaghemicycle─╢ 11:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Saying "weak keep" means "should be deleted but I like it" as far as I'm concerned. If you're not sure if something should be kept or not, state your concern and perhaps others will address it. This is a discussion, not a voting booth. Drawn Some (talk) 11:12, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Saying "weak keep" means "should be deleted but I like it" as far as I'm concerned. OK, as you wish, but it's common terminology, and I thought I made my points clear. ╟─TreasuryTaghemicycle─╢ 11:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Lack of in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources of this topic to achieve notability. For the record, government websites of an embassy are NOT independent for this topic. If the newspapers and television people can't be bothered to cover it, and no one writes books about it, etc., it isn't notable and we don't synthesize some lame stub out of primary materials just to get rid of a red link on a template. All of this is shameful the way it wastes time and puts editors in opposition over a contentless stub. Drawn Some (talk) 11:12, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete One more un-notable combination and permutation. Mentally append my comment on recipes. Collect (talk) 11:38, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The only useful content ever likely in this article are the links Foreign relations of Austria (which does not mention Georgia!) and Foreign relations of Georgia (which mentions only some trivial information about Austria, implying that there is nothing notable to say). Fails Bilateral relations. Johnuniq (talk) 12:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong keep - not sure about contemporary relations (but I suspect that for Georgia Austria is one of the most important foreign partners these days), but historically Austria-Hungary and its ambassador Georg von Franckenstein were instrumental in the formation of the first, shortlived Democratic Republic of Georgia, together with the German and the Ottoman empire. For literature on these relations, see this book [2] Stepopen (talk) 21:46, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]