Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chanty Binx: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:20, 18 January 2016

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP sourced only to a negative Huffington Post opinion column. Doesn't meet WP:BIO. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 23:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Lack of sources in article is not a reasonable argument for deletion. Highly famous and influential feminist. Alex (talk) 23:48, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A quick Google search revealed many more reliable sources. I am not sure if WP:BEFORE has been done. sst ✈ 23:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Which? A Google News search finds virtually nothing - three of them are nothing but user comments on otherwise-entirely-unrelated articles which show up in the search. There are a number of random blogs which pop up in a regular Google search, but those aren't suitable sources for biographies. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 00:01, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 23:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 23:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 23:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – The subject has received news coverage only for one event; qualifies for deletion per WP:BLP1E. Upon source searches, the subject also does not appear to meet WP:BASIC at this time. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:40, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Is the continued criticism/harassment this person received not sustained coverage? How's this article on Vice? What about this? sst✈ 05:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Are those sources sufficient to write a biography of Binx, something more than the tiny and highly-slanted stub we have now? Can it ever be expanded beyond "Binx made some people mad, and those people harassed her"? If not, shouldn't we just merge and redirect to a related article? NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 05:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 *'''Delete''' – The subject has received news coverage only for one event; qualifies for deletion per [[WP:BLP1E]]. Upon source searches, the subject also does not appear to meet [[WP:BASIC]] at this time. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 00:40, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 **Is the continued criticism/harassment this person received not sustained coverage? How's [http://www.vice.com/read/do-we-have-to-worry-about-someone-actually-killing-or-raping-a-feminist-activist-887 this article] on Vice? What about [http://jezebel.com/rape-and-death-threats-what-mens-rights-activists-rea-476882099 this]? [[User talk:SSTflyer|<span style="color:olive">sst</span>]][[User:SSTflyer|<span style="color:black">✈</span>]] 05:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
+***Are those sources sufficient to write a ''biography'' of Binx, something more than the tiny and highly-slanted stub we have now? Can it ever be expanded beyond "Binx made some people mad, and those people harassed her"? If not, shouldn't we just merge and redirect to a related article? [[User:NorthBySouthBaranof|NorthBySouthBaranof]] ([[User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof|talk]]) 05:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC)